## The sum of the ages of Lindsey and Meghan is y, and Lindsey is exactly 9 years older than Meghan. Natalie is how many

##### This topic has expert replies
Moderator
Posts: 5034
Joined: 07 Sep 2017
Followed by:16 members

### The sum of the ages of Lindsey and Meghan is y, and Lindsey is exactly 9 years older than Meghan. Natalie is how many

by BTGmoderatorDC » Tue Sep 22, 2020 6:01 pm

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

## Global Stats

The sum of the ages of Lindsey and Meghan is y, and Lindsey is exactly 9 years older than Meghan. Natalie is how many years older than Meghan?

(1) In y years, Meghan will be exactly three times as old as Natalie is now.

(2) Lindsey is exactly 6 years older than Natalie.

OA D

Source: Veritas Prep

Legendary Member
Posts: 1971
Joined: 02 Mar 2018
Followed by:4 members

### Re: The sum of the ages of Lindsey and Meghan is y, and Lindsey is exactly 9 years older than Meghan. Natalie is how man

by deloitte247 » Sun Sep 27, 2020 1:01 am

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

## Global Stats

Let Lindsey's age = L
Let Meghan's age = m
Let Natalie's age = n
L + M = y - - - eqn (1)
L = M + 9 - - - eqn (2)
Target question => Natalie is how many years older than Meghan?
i.e What's n-m?
Statement 1: In y years, Meghan will be exactly three times as old as Natalie is now.
m + y = 3n - - - eqn (3)
Substituting Eqn. (2) in Eqn. (1)
m + 9 + m = y
2m + 9 = y - - - eqn (4)
Substituting Eqn. (4) in Eqn. (3)
m + (2m+9) = 3n
3m + 9 = 3n
3n - 3m = 9
$$\frac{3\left(n-m\right)}{3}=\frac{9}{3}$$
n - m = 3
Conclusively, Natalie is 3 years older than Meghan, hence statement 1 is SUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: Lindsey is exactly 6 years older than Natalie.
L - n = 6 - - - eqn (5)
Substituting Eqn. (2) in Eqn. (5)
m + 9 - n = 6
m - n = 6 - 9
m - n = -3
(multiply althrough by -1)
n - m = 3
In conclusion, Natalie is 3 years older than Meghan. Therefore, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT.
Since each alone is SUFFICIENT, option D is correct.

• Page 1 of 1