BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

The proportion of women among students enrolled in higher

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Thu Sep 20, 2018 5:20 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

The proportion of women among students enrolled in higher education programs has increased over the past decades. This is partly shown by the fact that in 1959, only 11 percent of the women between twenty and twenty-one were enrolled in college, while in 1981, 30 percent of the women between twenty and twenty-one were enrolled in college.

To evaluate the argument above, it would be most useful to compare 1959 and 1981 with regard to which of the following characteristics?

(A) The percentage of women between twenty and twenty-one who were not enrolled in college
(B) The percentage of women between twenty and twenty-five who graduated from college
(C) The percentage of women who, after attending college, entered highly paid professions
(D) The percentage of men between twenty and twenty-one who were enrolled in college
(E) The percentage of men who graduated from high school

OA D

Source: Official Guide
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by ceilidh.erickson » Fri Sep 21, 2018 11:53 am
In order to EVALUATE an argument, we must first find the logical flaw in the argument.

This argument is conflating two different metrics:
1. the proportion of women among total students: (women students)/(women students + non-women students)
2. the proportion of all women of a certain age who *are* students: (women students)/(women students + women who are not students)

(Also note that this problem assumes a male/female gender binary, which itself can be considered logically flawed. But until the GMAT changes its stance on this, we'll have to treat these as mutually exclusive & comprehensive categories on questions like this).

Imagine that in 1959, there were 100,000 men and 100,000 women in these age ranges. (To keep things simple, let's not even worry about population increase over time).

Scenario A:
1959: 11% of women are enrolled --> 11,000. Let's imagine that 30,000 men are enrolled. That makes women a little over ~25% of the student population.
1981: 30% of women are enrolled --> 30,000. Let's say that the # of men stayed unchanged: 30,000 men. That makes women 50% of the student population.
The author's argument holds: the proportion of women out of all students has increased.

Scenario A:
1959: 11% of women are enrolled --> 11,000. Let's keep the same 30,000 men enrolled. Again, women = ~25% of the student population.
1981: 30% of women are enrolled --> 30,000. Let's now say that the number of men enrolled increases to 90,000. That makes women exactly 25% of the student population.
The proportion of women enrolled actually decreased in this scenario.

If we want to know about women as a proportion of all students, we also need to know whether the proportion of male students out of all male 18-25 yrs olds changed.

(A) The percentage of women between twenty and twenty-one who were not enrolled in college
This is already inferable from the given info.

(B) The percentage of women between twenty and twenty-five who graduated from college
Graduation is irrelevant to the argument - it's only dealing with enrollment proportions.

(C) The percentage of women who, after attending college, entered highly paid professions
Again, irrelevant.

(D) The percentage of men between twenty and twenty-one who were enrolled in college
Yes, this is exactly what's missing.

(E) The percentage of men who graduated from high school
Irrelevant to whether they go to college or not.

The answer is D.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion