BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

The proper way to plan

Expert replies
by madhur_ahuja » Fri Aug 07, 2009 8:10 pm
The proper way to plan a scientific project is first to decide its goal and then to plan the best way to accomplish that goal. The United States space station project does not conform to this ideal. When the Cold War ended, the project lost its original purpose, so another purpose was quickly grafted onto the project, that of conducting limited-gravity experiments, even though such experiments can be done in an alternative way. It is, therefore, abundantly clear that the space station should not be built.

The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument

(A) attacks the proponents of a claim rather than arguing against the claim itself

(B) presupposes what it sets out to prove

(C) faults planners for not foreseeing a certain event, when in fact that event was not foreseeable

(D) contains statements that lead to a self-contradiction

(E) concludes that a shortcoming is fatal, having produced evidence only of the existence of that shortcoming
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by urs_maverick » Sat Aug 08, 2009 1:53 am
IMO B since its assumes "The proper way to plan a scientific project is first to decide its goal and then to plan the best way to accomplish that goal" without providing any evidence for it
Join the discussion

by life is a test » Sat Aug 08, 2009 2:08 am
between B and D, I am more inclined towards D since the passage criticises what was earlier defined as a logical plan (i.e. one that has goals set out first).
Join the discussion

by krisraam » Sat Aug 08, 2009 8:41 am
IMO B.

Thanks,
Raama
Join the discussion

by riteshbindal » Sat Aug 08, 2009 8:45 am
imo D
Join the discussion

by arorag » Sat Aug 08, 2009 8:51 am
I am With E, Expt of gravity can be done in other "BEST" way but they are not doing.....BUt this can't be reason for not building
Join the discussion

by gmat_dest » Sat Aug 08, 2009 10:10 am
The more I read, the better I feel about E.

OA please!
Join the discussion

Re: The proper way to plan

by shahdevine » Sat Aug 08, 2009 11:04 am
madhur_ahuja wrote:The proper way to plan a scientific project is first to decide its goal and then to plan the best way to accomplish that goal. The United States space station project does not conform to this ideal. When the Cold War ended, the project lost its original purpose, so another purpose was quickly grafted onto the project, that of conducting limited-gravity experiments, even though such experiments can be done in an alternative way. It is, therefore, abundantly clear that the space station should not be built.

The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument

(A) attacks the proponents of a claim rather than arguing against the claim itself

(B) presupposes what it sets out to prove

(C) faults planners for not foreseeing a certain event, when in fact that event was not foreseeable

(D) contains statements that lead to a self-contradiction

(E) concludes that a shortcoming is fatal, having produced evidence only of the existence of that shortcoming
b...i was going to go e...what's oa?
Join the discussion

Re: The proper way to plan

by ogbeni » Sat Aug 08, 2009 12:58 pm
madhur_ahuja wrote:The proper way to plan a scientific project is first to decide its goal and then to plan the best way to accomplish that goal. The United States space station project does not conform to this ideal. When the Cold War ended, the project lost its original purpose, so another purpose was quickly grafted onto the project, that of conducting limited-gravity experiments, even though such experiments can be done in an alternative way. It is, therefore, abundantly clear that the space station should not be built.

The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
This is definitely B because if you look the stimulus the structure goes:

Premise 1: The proper way to plan a scientific project is to first decide its goal and then plan the best way to accomplish that goal
Premise 2:When the Cold War ended, the project lost its original purpose, so another purpose was quickly grafted onto the project, that of conducting limited-gravity experiments, even though such experiments can be done in an alternative way.
Conclusion:It is, therefore, abundantly clear that the space station should not be built.

Note that the argument does not provide any evidence that demonstrates that the alternate way is better than the space station. Therefore, the conclusion does not logically tell us any thing new hence the choice of

[spoiler](B) presupposes what it sets out to prove [/spoiler]
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Sun Aug 09, 2009 8:27 pm
IMO - B
Join the discussion

by perfectstranger » Mon Aug 17, 2009 8:03 am
OE is E I've get this from test magic
Please do not post answers visibly . Please hide them or post them later after the discussion.
Join the discussion

by kris77 » Sun May 15, 2016 3:26 pm
I would go with option B as the correct option
Join the discussion