Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 1 and Nov 21. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 1
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 1 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand5 seats leftStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

The company announced that its profits declined

Expert replies
by manhhiep2509 » Wed Jan 29, 2014 8:40 pm
The company announced that its profits declined much less in the second quarter than analysts had expected it to and its business will improve in the second half of the year.

A) had expected it to and its business will improve
B )had expected and that its business would improve
C )expected it would and that it will improve its business
D )expected them to and its business would improve
E) expected and that it will have improved its business

Hi.
Please help me clarify my confusion.

(1) When I solved the question, I did not think that "would" or "will" is important because from the context I cannot determine whether "the second half of the year" passed.

However, some people say that "would", if used to express uncertainty, can only exist in sentence that has the structure "if X, then Y" or structures that indicate hypothesis. Is it correct?

If not, can "would" express uncertainty in the sentence?
----------

(2) In choice C, I overlooked an error that "it" does not match "profits", but I still eliminate the choice because "analysts expected" is wrong tense and because "X is more adj than analysts expected" is enough to convey intended meaning.

So, is "X is more adj than analysts expected X would" redundant?

Thank you.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by AnjaliOberoi » Thu Jan 30, 2014 8:21 pm
The company announced that its profits declined much less in the second quarter than analysts had expected it to and its business will improve in the second half of the year.

A) had expected it to and its business will improve -- incorrect
B )had expected and that its business would improve
C )expected it would and that it will improve its business - incorrectD )expected them to and its business would improve after and "that " should be present to maintain parallelism - incorrect
E) expected and that it will have improved its business -- wrong tense

I think would is used when we are talking about future w.r.t past
IMO B
Join the discussion

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Fri Jan 31, 2014 3:19 pm
The biggest distinction I see is "had expected" or "expected". If you go with the simple past tense, it is now occurring at the same time as "declined", which doesn't make sense. The expectation must have happened earlier, so go with past perfect and eliminate C, D, and E.

I think the conditional "would" makes sense here. The company says it's going to happen, but it's not guaranteed.
Join Veritas Prep’s 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion