Isotopes in the recently excavated bones of a 14-year-old girl from the Jamestown archaeological site indicate she had eaten a high-protein diet, so was probably the daughter of a gentleman, not a maidservant.
A) she had eaten a high-protein diet, so was probably the daughter of a gentleman, not a maidservant.
B) that she ate a high protein diet, so probably had been the daughter of a gentleman, and not a maidservant.
C) that she had eaten a high protein diet, so was probably the daughter of a gentleman, and not a maidservant’s.
D) she ate a high-protein diet, so was probably the daughter of a gentleman, and had not been a maidservant.
E) she had eaten a high-protein diet, thereby had probably been the daughter of a gentleman, not a maidservant’s.
OA: A
Source: Veritas prep question bank
My question: Why do we need past perfect in the correct version of the sentence? We do not have two events in the past here? The girl can't eat something before she was the daughter of someone. That's just nonsensical to me. Experts, please explain.
A) she had eaten a high-protein diet, so was probably the daughter of a gentleman, not a maidservant.
B) that she ate a high protein diet, so probably had been the daughter of a gentleman, and not a maidservant.
C) that she had eaten a high protein diet, so was probably the daughter of a gentleman, and not a maidservant’s.
D) she ate a high-protein diet, so was probably the daughter of a gentleman, and had not been a maidservant.
E) she had eaten a high-protein diet, thereby had probably been the daughter of a gentleman, not a maidservant’s.
OA: A
Source: Veritas prep question bank
My question: Why do we need past perfect in the correct version of the sentence? We do not have two events in the past here? The girl can't eat something before she was the daughter of someone. That's just nonsensical to me. Experts, please explain.
