LSAT CR

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:56 pm
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:1 members

LSAT CR

by paes » Thu Jul 15, 2010 7:04 am

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1460
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 1:28 am
Thanked: 135 times
Followed by:7 members

by selango » Thu Jul 15, 2010 7:29 am
IMO B
--Anand--

Legendary Member
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:56 pm
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:1 members

by paes » Thu Jul 15, 2010 8:24 am
It is not B. oher thoughts !!

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1460
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 1:28 am
Thanked: 135 times
Followed by:7 members

by selango » Thu Jul 15, 2010 8:48 am
Distance travelled and size of the group is related to Diet.Diet depends upon size of teeth and face.

so distance and size is related to size of teeth and face.

Only option E supports that.
--Anand--

Legendary Member
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:56 pm
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:1 members

by paes » Thu Jul 15, 2010 8:55 am
selango wrote:Distance travelled and size of the group is related to Diet.Diet depends upon size of teeth and face.

so distance and size is related to size of teeth and face.

Only option E supports that.
It is an inference problem, not a support problem.

How the statement supports (Inference) that -> animal is likely to be a herd animal.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 41
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:09 am
Thanked: 2 times

by kamalsinghy » Thu Jul 15, 2010 9:06 am
IMO E.

A. defined the new relations(meat->small ranges and small groups) that are not stated in argument.

B. states new information about varied diets vs. one or two diets.

C. again new relationship so irrelevant.

D. from size and shape of face, species are not identified -> not mentioned in the argument.

E. quite possibly related to the information mentioned in the argument.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1172
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:20 pm
Thanked: 74 times
Followed by:4 members

by uwhusky » Thu Jul 15, 2010 9:07 am
with all the other answers falling into the category of "could" be true, only E can be right.

A) no such reference to the type of food that animals eat.
B) size? open to possibility.
C) where they travel in the pack is also open for wide range of possibility.
D) words are too strong, "all that is needed".


I guess I don't even care what E says =)

but "is likely" usually makes good candidate.

Legendary Member
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:56 pm
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:1 members

by paes » Thu Jul 15, 2010 9:11 am
Yes guys, OA is E only.

Legendary Member
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:56 pm
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:1 members

by paes » Thu Jul 15, 2010 9:12 am
uwhusky wrote:with all the other answers falling into the category of "could" be true, only E can be right.

A) no such reference to the type of food that animals eat.
B) size? open to possibility.
C) where they travel in the pack is also open for wide range of possibility.
D) words are too strong, "all that is needed".


I guess I don't even care what E says =)

but "is likely" usually makes good candidate.
---> good reasoning . but except E, C also has the word likely.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1261
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:46 am
Thanked: 27 times
GMAT Score:570

by reply2spg » Sat Jul 17, 2010 2:05 pm
Type of diet is not mentioned in the passage. So A, B can easily eliminated.
Nowhere in passage it is mentioned that how to determine species of the animal, so eliminate D
Nowhere it is mentioned in the passage about who walks where while travelling. This eliminates C

Therefore answer must be E.
paes wrote:Yes guys, OA is E only.
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)