BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Tax!

Expert replies
by gmat_perfect » Sat Oct 16, 2010 12:08 am
In order to raise revenue, the federal government planned a tax amnesty program that allows tax delinquents to pay all owed tax without added financial penalty. However, economists projected that the federal government would collect a far lower percentage of total tax owed by delinquents than did state governments implementing similar programs.

Which of the following, if true, would most contribute to an explanation of the economists' projections?

A. Tax amnesty programs are only successful if they are widely publicized.
B. Most people who honestly pay their state tax are equally honest in paying their federal tax.
C. Although federal tax delinquents usually must pay high financial penalties, the states require far lower financial penalties.
D. The state tax rate varies considerably from state to state, but the federal tax is levied according to laws which apply to citizens of all the states.
E. Unlike most federal tax delinquents, most state tax delinquents fail to pay state tax because of an oversight rather than a decision not to pay.

OA: E

I have thought:

Since a federal government MUST cover more areas to publicize the news, state will have some advantage due to its smaller area. I think that A is correct answer. What is the exact deal?

Thanks.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by neerajkumar1_1 » Sat Oct 16, 2010 12:41 am
conclusion: state govns will collect more than federal govn..
assumption: there must be some attribute diff bet fed govn and state govn that one will be successful...

A: irrelevant..
further to clear ur doubt...
Tax amnesty programs are only successful if they are widely publicized.
so if fed govn widely publicizes the tax program, it should earn more...

B: strengthens..
C: the statements say that no penalties... so this fact will not make a difference..
D: irrelevant...
E: Perfect: this says that people dont want to pay federal taxes...
and that people who have not yet paid for state taxes, want to pay but forgot...
so obviously when implemented at state level, people will eventually pay and collect more than federal govn...

Hope this helps!!
Join the discussion

by niksworth » Sat Oct 16, 2010 6:12 am
gmat_perfect wrote: I have thought:

Since a federal government MUST cover more areas to publicize the news, state will have some advantage due to its smaller area. I think that A is correct answer. What is the exact deal?

Thanks.
You cannot do that. You are assuming that the federal government cannot publicize widely, because it has a wider area to cover. No information in the argument supports this assumption. We cannot bring in outside assumptions / knowledge to solve a CR problem. A cannot be right.

E is a sound choice.

E says that most state taxpayers don't pay because of oversight while most federal taxpayers don't pay because of a conscious decision to not do so. So, an incentive program is more likely to help those who forgot in the first place. So, this program will be more successful at the state level than at the federal level.
scio me nihil scire
Join the discussion

by rooster » Sat Oct 16, 2010 6:50 am
gmat_perfect wrote:In order to raise revenue, the federal government planned a tax amnesty program that allows tax delinquents to pay all owed tax without added financial penalty. However, economists projected that the federal government would collect a far lower percentage of total tax owed by delinquents than did state governments implementing similar programs.

Which of the following, if true, would most contribute to an explanation of the economists' projections?

A. Tax amnesty programs are only successful if they are widely publicized.
B. Most people who honestly pay their state tax are equally honest in paying their federal tax.
C. Although federal tax delinquents usually must pay high financial penalties, the states require far lower financial penalties.
D. The state tax rate varies considerably from state to state, but the federal tax is levied according to laws which apply to citizens of all the states.
E. Unlike most federal tax delinquents, most state tax delinquents fail to pay state tax because of an oversight rather than a decision not to pay.

OA: E

I have thought:

Since a federal government MUST cover more areas to publicize the news, state will have some advantage due to its smaller area. I think that A is correct answer. What is the exact deal?

Thanks.
E is the sound choice bc it makes sense: federal tax delinquents and state tax delinquents do not pay for different reasons.

niksworth also brings a good point, in order for A to work, we still need to make the assumption that it is harder to widely publicize the two. In regard to the definition of "widely publicize" wouldn't a federal tax initiative be more widely publicized than something that is only done across a state? E is the right choice because it's more straight forward IMO.
Join the discussion

by this_time_i_will » Sat Oct 16, 2010 9:56 am
Further to the above explanations, don't you think that the use of word only makes the option too extreme.
Join the discussion