BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Suriland cannot both export wheat and keep bread plentiful

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Sat Oct 26, 2019 9:41 pm
Suriland cannot both export wheat and keep bread plentiful and affordable in Suriland. Accordingly, Suriland's wheat farmers are required to sell their crop to the government, which pays them a dollar per bushel less than the price on the world market. Therefore, if the farmers could sell their wheat on the world market, they would make a dollar per bushel more, less any additional transportation and brokerage costs they would have to pay.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. Suriland's wheat farmers have higher production costs than do farmers in many other wheat-producing countries.
B. Sale of a substantial proportion of Suriland's wheat crop on the world market would probably depress the price of wheat.
C. The transportation and brokerage costs that Suriland's farmers would face if they sold their wheat outside Suriland could amount to almost a dollar per bushel.
D. Suriland is surrounded by countries that do not import any wheat.
E. The price of a bushel of wheat on the world market occasionally drops below the average cost of producing a bushel of wheat in Suriland.

OA B

Source: Official Guide
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Sun Nov 24, 2019 9:25 am
Premise: Suriland cannot both export wheat and keep bread plentiful and affordable in Suriland.

Conclusion: If the farmers could sell their wheat on the world market, they would make a dollar per bushel more, less any additional transportation and brokerage costs they would have to pay.

Option A - Incorrect:
We do not have any information about farmers in many other wheat-producing countries as we are concerned about Suriland's wheat farmers. Hence, we do not know if they have a higher production cost than farmers in many other wheat-producing countries.

Option B - Correct:
This option weakens the argument the most because it was stated that if the farmers could sell their wheat on the world market, they would make a dollar per bushel more. From this, it is clear that the world market would increase and not depress the price of wheat.

Option C - Incorrect:
This is not true. The transportation and brokerage costs if the farmers sold their wheat outside Suriland weren't specified in the passage and as such, we cannot ascertain if these costs would amount to almost a dollar per bushel. However, we know from the passage that selling of wheat on the world market by the farmers would help them make a dollar per bushel more, and less any additional transportation and brokerage costs they would have to pay.

Option D - Incorrect:
This is outside the scope of this argument, and as such, it is invalid.

Option E - Incorrect:
This claim cannot be validated from this passage. So, it is out of context and thus is wrong.


Thanks
Join the discussion