BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Sum of positive integers

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by DanaJ » Fri May 08, 2009 10:30 am
This problem is wrong.
Statement 1 doesn't make sense and let me explain why. x and y are both positive integers and it says there that x = y + 1. Since x + y = 72, then it's safe to say that y + 1 + y = 2y + 1 = 72. This means that 2y = 71, with y = 35.5. As you can see, 35.5 is NOT a positive integer. This contradicts the initial assumption.
Join the discussion

Re: Sum of positive integers

by Ian Stewart » Fri May 08, 2009 2:36 pm
piyush_nitt wrote:Sum of positive integers x and y is 72. What is xy?
a. x = y + 1
b. x and y have same tens digit
Agree with Dana - if x+y = 72, then either x and y are both odd, or x and y are both even. Statement 1 says that x and y are consecutive integers (i.e. one of them is odd, the other even) which contradicts information in the question.

If S1 didn't lead to a contradiction (e.g. if it said x = y+2), using it and the information in the question, you'd be able to find both x and y, and therefore answer the question. S2 alone would not be sufficient, since there are a few pairs of values of x and y with the same tens digit that add to 72 (36+36, 35+37, etc), and for each we get a different product xy.

Still, if that's the original version of the question, there's something wrong with the source.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion