Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Street crime can be averted through regulations mandating

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Sat Mar 23, 2019 9:05 pm
Timer
00:00
Your answer
Difficulty–

right wrong

Pick an answer to see how members did

Street crime can be averted through regulations mandating the lighting of streetlights during daytime. As daytime visibility is worse in nations farther from the equator, so obviously such regulations would be more successful in averting crime there. Actually, the only nations that have adopted such regulations are farther from the equator than the continental United States.

Which of the following conclusions could be most properly drawn from the information given above?

(A) Bystanders in the continental United States who were near lit streetlights during the day would be just as likely to become victims of a crime as would bystanders who were not near lit streetlights.

(B) Inadequate daytime visibility is the single most important factor in street crime in numerous nations that are located farther from the equator than is the continental United States.

(C) In nations that have daytime streetlight regulations, the percentage of street crime that happens in the daytime is greater than in the continental United States.

(D) Nations that have daytime streetlight regulations probably have fewer incidents of street crime annually than do occur within the continental United States.

(E) Daytime streetlight regulations would probably do less to avert street crime in the continental United States than they do in the nations that have the regulations.

OA E

Source: Official Guide
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Sat Apr 06, 2019 3:20 am
OPTION A - INCORRECT
Well, this given conclusion cannot be drawn from the given information because the main aim of the argument is to reduce street crime by mandating the lightening of street lights not to compare how crimes are carried out either near street lights or not

OPTION B - INCORRECT
This is an established fact in the information given and cannot serve as a conclusion to the argument

OPTION C - INCORRECT
This opposes the argument due to the fact that the daytime street-light regulations had no positive effect on the crime rate. This option claims that the percentage of crime rate is greater even after the implementation of the street-light rule. This cannot serve as a conclusion drawn from the argument because it opposes it.

OPTION D - INCORRECT
Possibly, but this option has no strong basis or evidence to prove this in the information supplied. Therefore, it cannot serve as a conclusion to the argument.

OPTION E - CORRECT
The daytime street-light regulations would probably do less to avert crime in the continental United States because the regulations were not adopted by them.
So, unlike the other States who adopted the regulations and have a higher chance to successfully avert crime.
Join the discussion