stocks

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 162
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 8:33 pm
Location: San Jose,CA
Thanked: 1 times

stocks

by ddm » Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:32 pm
attachment
Attachments
1.JPG

Legendary Member
Posts: 1153
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:21 am
Thanked: 146 times
Followed by:2 members

by parallel_chase » Fri Aug 29, 2008 4:41 pm
stock bought = $p

increasing rate = r/100

decreased by=$q

sold for = $v

r = 100*sqrt[(v+q)/p] - 1

r/100 = sqrt[(v+q)/p] - 1

(r/100)^2 = (v+q)/p - 1 = [v+q - p]/p

p* (r/100)^2 = v+q -p

p + p(r/100)^2 = v+q


1st day increase = r/100
2nd day increase = r/100

total increase = (r/100)^2

total price of stock on 2nd day = p + p(r/100)^2

3rd day stock decreased by $q
sold the stock for $v

stock price - $q = $v

Therefore,

p + p(r/100)^2 - q = v

p + p(r/100)^2 = v+q

how many days after buying the share stock was sold

1st day increase
2nd day increase
3rd day decrease

Total 3 working days.


Took sometime to do this problem. If you dismantle the equation given in the question, this problem can be done in less than 1 minute. Let me know if you have any doubts.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 162
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 8:33 pm
Location: San Jose,CA
Thanked: 1 times

by ddm » Fri Aug 29, 2008 6:23 pm
thanks a lot...

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 87
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 10:23 am
Location: Lima
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:1 members

by Fab » Sun Aug 31, 2008 11:00 am
To parallel chase:

How did you get from:

r/100 = sqrt[(v+q)/p] - 1 to

(r/100)^2 = (v+q)/p - 1 = [v+q - p]/p

I thought [(v+q)/p - 1] ^2is a square binomiun...

THANKS

Legendary Member
Posts: 829
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:09 pm
Location: INDIA
Thanked: 84 times
Followed by:3 members

by sudhir3127 » Sun Aug 31, 2008 11:15 am
Fab wrote:To parallel chase:

How did you get from:

r/100 = sqrt[(v+q)/p] - 1 to

(r/100)^2 = (v+q)/p - 1 = [v+q - p]/p

I thought [(v+q)/p - 1] ^2is a square binomiun...

THANKS
Me replying for chase,... hope he doesnt mind ...

r/100 = [sqrt[(v+q)/p] - 1 ]

u need to do squaring on both sides

it will be

(r/100)^2 =[sqrt[(v+q)/p] - 1 ]^2

square root and whole square get knocked off

we have

(r/100)^2 = (v+q)/p -1

take lcm on rhs.. its p

v+q -1*P/p

= ( v +q - p)/p

hope tha helps.. do let us know if u have any doubts

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 87
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 10:23 am
Location: Lima
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:1 members

by Fab » Sun Aug 31, 2008 12:35 pm
Hello Sudhir, i'm sorry if i'm missing something up, but isn't:

[sqrt[(v+q)/p] - 1 ]^2 = v+q/p - 2sqrt v+q/p + 1 ??

THANKS

Legendary Member
Posts: 829
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:09 pm
Location: INDIA
Thanked: 84 times
Followed by:3 members

by sudhir3127 » Sun Aug 31, 2008 10:10 pm
Fab wrote:Hello Sudhir, i'm sorry if i'm missing something up, but isn't:

[sqrt[(v+q)/p] - 1 ]^2 = v+q/p - 2sqrt v+q/p + 1 ??

THANKS

U shud see this as

[square root ( a-b)]^2

it will be just a-b but not a+b-2rt ab

i think u r getting confused with

(sqrt a- sqrt b )^2

in this case it will be

(sqrta)^2+ (sqrtb)^2 - 2( sqrta)(sqrtb)

it will be

a + b- 2rt ab

hope this helps ..do let us know if u still have doubts...

Legendary Member
Posts: 683
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 1:58 pm
Location: Dubai
Thanked: 73 times
Followed by:2 members

by mals24 » Mon Sep 01, 2008 4:17 am
sorry sudhir i didn't get ure explanation i have the same doubt as FAB

In the question only (v+q)/p is under the root and 1 isn't so sqrt[(v+q/p] is one term and 1 is another term so when we square it shouldn't we use the formula (a+b)^2 where a=sqrt[(v+q/p] and b=1

squaring it we should get (v+q)/p + 1 - 2sqrt[(v+q/p]

or is 1 also under the root because if it is then your method would be right but its a separate term outside the root.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 86
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:50 am
Thanked: 7 times

by hengirl03 » Sat Sep 06, 2008 4:29 pm
When you guys see a problem like this one, what is the first thing that you think to do?

Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pm
Thanked: 331 times
Followed by:11 members

by cramya » Sat Sep 06, 2008 7:06 pm
Given r = 100 (sqrt ((v+q) / p) - 1)

We are give the initial stock price is p and it increases by r% for a certain number of days

Therefore p (1+r/100) ^ n - q = v

n above is the no of days for which the stock increases by r % Sp the number of days after which stock was sold would be n + 1
(since its given the stock was sold the next day after the number of days the strock increased by r%)

Coming back to this equation p (1+r/100) ^ n - q = v

Since square root was involved I took the educated guess of plugging in 2
for n

so p (1+r/100) ^ 2- q = v

(1+r/100) ^ 2 = v+q/p

Taking sqareroot on both sides

1+r/100 = sqrt((v+q) / p)

r/100 = sqrt((v+q) / p) - 1
r = 100 * (sqrt((v+q) / p) - 1)

Therefore n = 2 and n+1 = 2+ 1=3. The stock was sold after(keword is AFTER) 3 days (includes the day stock was sold)

Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pm
Thanked: 331 times
Followed by:11 members

by cramya » Sat Sep 06, 2008 7:09 pm
I also agree with Mals24 and Fab's question.

The 1 is not inside the square root. Its outside the squareroot

so its not sqrt ((v+q/p) - 1) its

sqrt(v+q/p) - 1

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 172
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 3:35 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:610

I think its just two days

by karthikgmat » Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:09 pm
let me follow like this
cost = $p
profit = r/100
so total price after 1day = p[1+r/100]
for the second day it will be p * ([1+r/100]^2)
and so on like that....
on the nth day the price of it will be p*([1+r/100]^n)

fall in price of stock is $q

his selling price = $v so

v=p*([1+r/100]^n)-q

(v+q)/p= [1+r/100]^n

from the give eq

r = 100 (sqrt ((v+q) / p) - 1) and sub v+q)/p= [1+r/100]^n
we get n=2 i think its two days..
Am i Right..