BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

statistics manhattan gmat

Expert replies
by resilient » Fri Mar 14, 2008 6:39 pm
last year, the five employees of company x took an average of 16 vacation days each. What was teh average number of vacation days taken by teh same employees this year?

1. three employees had a 50% increase in their number of vacation days, and two employees had a 50% decrease/


2. Three employees had 10 more vacation days each and two employees had 5 fewer vacation days each.


qa is B

Obviously, statement 1 is insufficient because we need to know what the original number the increases and decreases are based on. BUT in statement 2, hwo is this sufficient. My specific question is WHERE do we know what to base the increase and decrease of days from. I ruled this out because we dont know what the original days the increases are based on. I ruled it out since we dont know if the 10 day increase is from an origiinal of 1 day each or an original of 20 days each. Can we make sense of this?
Appetite for 700 and I scraped my plate!
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: statistics manhattan gmat

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Sat Mar 15, 2008 7:17 pm
Enginpasa1 wrote:last year, the five employees of company x took an average of 16 vacation days each. What was teh average number of vacation days taken by teh same employees this year?

1. three employees had a 50% increase in their number of vacation days, and two employees had a 50% decrease/


2. Three employees had 10 more vacation days each and two employees had 5 fewer vacation days each.


qa is B

Obviously, statement 1 is insufficient because we need to know what the original number the increases and decreases are based on. BUT in statement 2, hwo is this sufficient. My specific question is WHERE do we know what to base the increase and decrease of days from. I ruled this out because we dont know what the original days the increases are based on. I ruled it out since we dont know if the 10 day increase is from an origiinal of 1 day each or an original of 20 days each. Can we make sense of this?
(2) tells us that the TOTAL number of vacation days this year is 20 more (3*10 - 2*5) than last year.

We know that last year the total # of vacation days was 16*5 = 80.

So, this year the total number is 80 + 20 = 100.

100 days spread out over 5 employees gives us an average of 20/employee: sufficient, choose (b).

There are other (and quicker) ways to make the same calculation, but since this is a DS question, we didn't really need to do the math anyway, as long as we recognize that if we can figure out the total # of vacation days and we know the # of employees, we can solve for the average.

A great first step in DS is to write down ANY formula that applies. Just jotting down avg = sum/# might have given you the insight you needed to see that (2) was suffiicient.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by yalephd2007 » Sun Apr 13, 2008 9:01 am
Yes, (2) was suffiicient
Join the discussion

Manhattan CAT GMATs

by Edthesock » Thu Jan 29, 2009 7:44 pm
yeah, I bought the manhattan gmat tests as well. they're pretty long winded and overly complicated generally. the difficulty level isn't beyond reasonable, as much as the questions take far more time to do than real gmat questions do. I looked at this one and didn't really know what to do with it, but when I saw the solution, i felt pretty dumb for not getting it.
Join the discussion

Re: statistics manhattan gmat

by sanjay_dce » Fri Jan 30, 2009 11:06 pm
resilient wrote:last year, the five employees of company x took an average of 16 vacation days each. What was teh average number of vacation days taken by teh same employees this year?

1. three employees had a 50% increase in their number of vacation days, and two employees had a 50% decrease/


2. Three employees had 10 more vacation days each and two employees had 5 fewer vacation days each.


qa is B

Obviously, statement 1 is insufficient because we need to know what the original number the increases and decreases are based on. BUT in statement 2, hwo is this sufficient. My specific question is WHERE do we know what to base the increase and decrease of days from. I ruled this out because we dont know what the original days the increases are based on. I ruled it out since we dont know if the 10 day increase is from an origiinal of 1 day each or an original of 20 days each. Can we make sense of this?
stmt 2 can give the new avg. because the total sum of vacation is increased by 20 and people remains same =5
hence B
Join the discussion