The radioactive element americium has a half-life of 432 years. Suppose we start with a 20-g mass of americium.
How much will be left after 367 years?
A. 17.0 g
B. 11.1 g
C. 15.5 g
D. 8.8 g
E. 18.0 g
Radioactive - Tougher problem
This topic has expert replies
is the OA B? If so, I can explain....charlie33 wrote:The radioactive element americium has a half-life of 432 years. Suppose we start with a 20-g mass of americium.
How much will be left after 367 years?
A. 17.0 g
B. 11.1 g
C. 15.5 g
D. 8.8 g
E. 18.0 g
- ssmiles08
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 472
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:54 pm
- Thanked: 56 times
Is there some sort of formula for these kind of problems? It would be nice to know some solid way of going about this.
I would have just approximated 11.1 as the answer b/c you know in 432 years, the radioactive element would be 10g.
367 years a little more than 80% of 432 years which means it would have decayed about 80% of its first half life. 80% of 10 = 8 so 20 - 8 ~ 12
would have guesstimated it around 11-12% which would be B in this case.
I would have just approximated 11.1 as the answer b/c you know in 432 years, the radioactive element would be 10g.
367 years a little more than 80% of 432 years which means it would have decayed about 80% of its first half life. 80% of 10 = 8 so 20 - 8 ~ 12
would have guesstimated it around 11-12% which would be B in this case.
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Ian Stewart
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2621
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
- Location: Montreal
- Thanked: 1090 times
- Followed by:355 members
- GMAT Score:780
You'll never see a question like this on a real GMAT, first because you'd need to know what 'half-life' means, which is not something you're assumed to know on the GMAT (it's not a physics test), and second because the calculation is impossible without a calculator. Sure, you can tell from the answer choices which must be right, but if the GMAT were to design a question around this concept, they would not use numbers like 432 and 367 in the question; instead they'd use numbers that were manageable.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com
ianstewartgmat.com
ianstewartgmat.com
Exactly.....Ian Stewart wrote:You'll never see a question like this on a real GMAT, first because you'd need to know what 'half-life' means, which is not something you're assumed to know on the GMAT (it's not a physics test), and second because the calculation is impossible without a calculator. Sure, you can tell from the answer choices which must be right, but if the GMAT were to design a question around this concept, they would not use numbers like 432 and 367 in the question; instead they'd use numbers that were manageable.