Some Assumption Questions.

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 267
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 12:20 am
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:1 members

Some Assumption Questions.

by Mani_mba » Sun Jul 20, 2008 9:06 pm
1. Technically a given category of insurance policy is under priced if, over time, claims against it plus expenses associated with it exceed total income from premiums. But premium income can be invested and will then yield returns of its own. Therefore, an under priced policy does not represent a net loss in every case.
The argument above is based on which of the following assumptions?
(A) No insurance policies are deliberately under priced in order to attract customers to the insurance company offering such policies.
(B) A policy that represents a net loss to the insurance company is not an under priced policy in every case.
(C) There are policies for which the level of claims per year can be predicted with great accuracy before premiums are set.
(D) The income earned by investing premium income is the most important determinant of an insurance company’s profits.
(E) The claims against at least some under priced policies do not require paying out all of the premium income from those policies as soon as it is earned.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
2) In several cities, the government is going ahead with ambitious construction projects despite the high office vacancy rates in those cities. The vacant offices, though available for leasing, unfortunately do not meet the requirements for the facilities needed, such as court houses and laboratories. The government, therefore, is not guilty of any fiscal wastefulness.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?
(A) Adaptation of vacant office space to meet the government’s requirements, if possible, would not make leasing such office space a more cost-effective alternative to new construction.
(B) The government prefers leasing facilities to owning them in cases where the two alternatives are equally cost-effective.
(C) If facilities available for leasing come very close to meeting the government’s requirements for facilities the government needs, the government can relax its own requirements slightly and consider those facilities in compliance.
(D) The government’s construction projects would not on being completed, add to the stock of facilities available for leasing in the cities concerned.
(E) Before embarking on any major construction project, the government is required by law to establish beyond any reasonable doubt that there are no alternatives that are most cost-effective.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
3) Top college graduates are having more difficulty demonstrating their superiority to prospective employers than did the top students of twenty years ago when an honors degree was distinction enough. Today’s employers are less impressed with the honors degree. Twenty years ago no more than 10 percent of a given class graduated with honors. Today, however, because of grade inflation, the honors degree goes to more than 50 percent of a graduating class. Therefore, to restore confidence in the degrees they award, colleges must take steps to control grade inflation.
Which one of the following is an assumption that, if true, would support the conclusion in the passage?
(A) Today’s students are not higher achievers than the students of twenty years ago.
(B) Awarding too many honors degrees causes colleges to inflate grades.
(C) Today’s employers rely on honors ranking in making their hiring decisions.
(D) It is not easy for students with low grades to obtain jobs.
(E) Colleges must make employers aware of the criteria used to determine who receives an honors degree

----------------------------------------------------------

I have no OAs for these questions. So i request experts also to jump in and provide possible solutions with explanations.

Legendary Member
Posts: 572
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 9:25 am
Thanked: 21 times

by reachac » Sun Jul 20, 2008 9:16 pm
E
A
A

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 187
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 5:44 am
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:1 members

by loki.gmat » Sun Jul 20, 2008 10:30 pm
1) IMO E - if all the under priced policies require the premium to be paid out as soon as it earned then the companies wont be able to invest n yield returns.


2) IMO A - if the government is a bit more innovative in its construction projects then the requirements of court houses and laboratories can be met.hence the government will be guilty of fiscal wastefulness.


3) IMO C - if today's employers donot rely on honors ranking in making their hiring decisions then the steps taken by the colleges to control grade inflation will not restore confidence in the degrees.


Thanks!

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 1:40 pm
Location: United States
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

by john1234 » Sun Jul 20, 2008 10:42 pm
1) E
2)A
3)B.

1) The author concludes that an underprice policy does not represent a net loss in every case.Why? Because he assumes that the claims against at least some under priced policies do not require paying out all of the premium income from those policies as soon as it is earned .
And to be sure you get the right answer,you can NEGATE the answer choice to see whether it weakens the conclusion.

2) .Adaptation of vacant office space to meet the government’s requirements, if possible, would not make leasing such office space a more cost-effective alternative to new construction.

3) The conclusion is "colleges must take steps to control grade inflation" the only answer choice that reflects on the conclusion is B.
I paraphased the argument as "Many honor degrees are caused by grade inflation".
Even impossible says I M possible

Legendary Member
Posts: 1159
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:35 pm
Thanked: 56 times

by raunekk » Sun Jul 20, 2008 11:33 pm
IMO:

E

A

A

Legendary Member
Posts: 1169
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 2:34 am
Thanked: 25 times
Followed by:1 members

by aj5105 » Mon Jul 21, 2008 5:51 am
E

A

B

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 8:33 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by Mahalo » Mon Jul 21, 2008 6:44 pm
1. IMO (E)

Conclusion:
Therefore, an under priced policy does not represent a net loss in every case.

what if claims against at least some of the under priced policies are not paid instantly after its premium income is earned. Then, the premium income can be invested and it will earn some profits for the policy.

2. IMO (E)

Conclusion:
The government, therefore, is not guilty of any fiscal wastefulness.

If the government establishes that there are no cost-effective alternative before embarking on any project, it can be said that the government is not guilty of any fiscal wastefulness

3. IMO (A)

Conclusion:
Therefore, to restore confidence in the degrees they award, colleges must take steps to control grade inflation.

what if today’s students are not higher achievers than the students of twenty years ago. # of honours grades can be kept at par with the # 20 years ago.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 575
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 2:58 am
Location: India
Thanked: 18 times
Followed by:4 members
GMAT Score:710

by rahulg83 » Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:39 am
Top college graduates are having more difficulty demonstrating their superiority to prospective employers than did the top students of twenty years ago when an honors degree was distinction enough. Today’s employers are less impressed with the honors degree. Twenty years ago no more than 10 percent of a given class graduated with honors. Today, however, because of grade inflation, the honors degree goes to more than 50 percent of a graduating class. Therefore, to restore confidence in the degrees they award, colleges must take steps to control grade inflation.
Which one of the following is an assumption that, if true, would support the conclusion in the passage?
(A) Today’s students are not higher achievers than the students of twenty years ago.
(B) Awarding too many honors degrees causes colleges to inflate grades.
(C) Today’s employers rely on honors ranking in making their hiring decisions.
(D) It is not easy for students with low grades to obtain jobs.
(E) Colleges must make employers aware of the criteria used to determine who receives an honors degree
Opinions on this one guys?
I was between A and B..
But B closely ties with the conclusion..There is a split amongst these choices as you can see in previous posts..

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 31
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 12:11 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by ashton_s_83 » Thu Jul 23, 2009 6:28 am
The OA for the third one is (A) for sure, I have seen the first and second ones before too and I think (I am not sure) but the OA to those are (E) and (A)

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 8:34 pm

by georgeann » Tue Jul 28, 2009 9:43 pm
Quote:
Top college graduates are having more difficulty demonstrating their superiority to prospective employers than did the top students of twenty years ago when an honors degree was distinction enough. Today’s employers are less impressed with the honors degree. Twenty years ago no more than 10 percent of a given class graduated with honors. Today, however, because of grade inflation, the honors degree goes to more than 50 percent of a graduating class. Therefore, to restore confidence in the degrees they award, colleges must take steps to control grade inflation.
Which one of the following is an assumption that, if true, would support the conclusion in the passage?
(A) Today’s students are not higher achievers than the students of twenty years ago.
(B) Awarding too many honors degrees causes colleges to inflate grades.
(C) Today’s employers rely on honors ranking in making their hiring decisions.
(D) It is not easy for students with low grades to obtain jobs.
(E) Colleges must make employers aware of the criteria used to determine who receives an honors degree

In this one B is clearly reversed meaning the stimulus says because of grade inflation, there are more honors. Answer B states the reverse that is because of awarding too many honors resulted in grade in inflation.
Hence this is wrong.

Hence I go for A[/quote]

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 197
Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 2:47 am
Thanked: 12 times

by shahdevine » Sat Aug 01, 2009 5:23 pm
Last one is b, for sure. please verify.

Its a classic move the official gmat test makers do where an assumption eliminates alternate models of causation. where the cause and the effect are not the reverse. Instead of inflating grades being the reason honors go to half of the class, honors going to half of the class become the cause of inflation i.e. in order to graduate a lot of honor students teachers inflate the grades.

cheers.

sd

Legendary Member
Posts: 627
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:12 am
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:1 members

by mankey » Fri Nov 11, 2011 9:14 am
IMO:

E
A
A

Someone please provide OA.

Thanks.