Soaring TV costs

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 541
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 6:44 pm
Location: UK
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:3 members
GMAT Score:680

Soaring TV costs

by rohangupta83 » Mon Nov 24, 2008 4:20 am
Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.

A. a greater proportion than it was
B. a greater proportion than
C. a greater proportion than they have been
D. which is greater than was so
E. which is greater than it has been

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 467
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 10:19 pm
Thanked: 27 times
Followed by:1 members

by karmayogi » Mon Nov 24, 2008 4:29 am
IMO B

A. 'it' is ambiguous.
B. correctly compares proportion in 1992 to proportion in previous years.
C. proportion can't be referred by 'they'. Improper use of present perfect tense
D. & E. 'which' must refer to noun immediately before which. That means, here 'which' is referring to year 1992.
Last edited by karmayogi on Mon Nov 24, 2008 4:31 am, edited 2 times in total.
Each soul is potentially divine. The goal is to manifest this divine within.
--By Swami Vivekananda

Legendary Member
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 am
Thanked: 55 times
Followed by:1 members

Re: Soaring TV costs

by iamcste » Mon Nov 24, 2008 4:29 am
rohangupta83 wrote:Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.

A. a greater proportion than it was
B. a greater proportion than
C. a greater proportion than they have been
D. which is greater than was so
E. which is greater than it has been

A


D and E- I didnt find any refferrent for which it could modify
C-They is ambiguous., Incorrect tense..are they still spending
B-Illogical comparsion "half the spending" is compared with "in any previous election"

A- "Half the spending" is a proportion, Pronoun "it" unambigously refers to singular antecedent and sets rigth comparison

Note: "The spending" is a gerund or a noun and "Half " is a quantifier.


Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 203
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 1:01 am
Location: Windsor
Thanked: 5 times
GMAT Score:650

by jsl » Mon Nov 24, 2008 4:52 am
Hmm - I would have gone for B actually. Isn't "television costs " plural?

Legendary Member
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 am
Thanked: 55 times
Followed by:1 members

by iamcste » Mon Nov 24, 2008 4:58 am
jsl wrote:Hmm - I would have gone for B actually. Isn't "television costs " plural?

Is "televsion costs" the subject for connecting clause? :shock:

Legendary Member
Posts: 541
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 6:44 pm
Location: UK
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:3 members
GMAT Score:680

by rohangupta83 » Mon Nov 24, 2008 5:17 am
I agree with you iamcste

But see, the issue is

OA is C and I don't see how..

Legendary Member
Posts: 1404
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 6:55 pm
Thanked: 18 times
Followed by:2 members

by tanviet » Mon Nov 24, 2008 5:47 am
C is wrong because "A propotion" sigular can not compare with "they" even when "have" is replaced with "had"

Legendary Member
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 am
Thanked: 55 times
Followed by:1 members

by iamcste » Mon Nov 24, 2008 6:05 am
rohangupta83 wrote:I agree with you iamcste

But see, the issue is

OA is C and I don't see how..

could I know source pls. Also, I have stopped believing OAs to be right.
Last 2 days, I could find errors in GMAT Prep qtn-OA :lol:

User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 1049
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Thanked: 113 times
Followed by:27 members
GMAT Score:710

by dmateer25 » Mon Nov 24, 2008 6:13 am
iamcste wrote:
rohangupta83 wrote:I agree with you iamcste

But see, the issue is

OA is C and I don't see how..

could I know source pls. Also, I have stopped believing OAs to be right.
Last 2 days, I could find errors in GMAT Prep qtn-OA :lol:
I agree!

Is this a GMAT prep question???


If it is C then "they" must be referring to costs.

costs account for more than they have in any previous election

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 9:31 pm
Thanked: 3 times

by skyline77 » Mon Nov 24, 2008 6:21 am
dmateer25 wrote:
iamcste wrote:
rohangupta83 wrote:I agree with you iamcste

But see, the issue is

OA is C and I don't see how..

could I know source pls. Also, I have stopped believing OAs to be right.
Last 2 days, I could find errors in GMAT Prep qtn-OA :lol:
I agree!

Is this a GMAT prep question???


If it is C then "they" must be referring to costs.

costs account for more than they have in any previous election
I think this is a GMATprep question. Think OA is B. But I choose C as well.

Legendary Member
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 am
Thanked: 55 times
Followed by:1 members

by iamcste » Mon Nov 24, 2008 6:26 am
dmateer25 wrote:
iamcste wrote:
rohangupta83 wrote:I agree with you iamcste

But see, the issue is

OA is C and I don't see how..

could I know source pls. Also, I have stopped believing OAs to be right.
Last 2 days, I could find errors in GMAT Prep qtn-OA :lol:
I agree!

Is this a GMAT prep question???


If it is C then "they" must be referring to costs.

costs account for more than they have in any previous election

hey dude

What abut tense..Have been ? are they still spending the money :lol:

Also, If "they" are costs , "a greater proportion" modifes costs

which is incorrect as costs are not proportions, "Half " are

Legendary Member
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 am
Thanked: 55 times
Followed by:1 members

by iamcste » Mon Nov 24, 2008 6:30 am
skyline77 wrote:[

I think this is a GMATprep question. Think OA is B. But I choose C as well.
Rohan-why difference in OA and then subsequent discussions. As per you OA is C

Legendary Member
Posts: 541
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 6:44 pm
Location: UK
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:3 members
GMAT Score:680

by rohangupta83 » Mon Nov 24, 2008 6:53 am
iamcste wrote:
skyline77 wrote:[

I think this is a GMATprep question. Think OA is B. But I choose C as well.
Rohan-why difference in OA and then subsequent discussions. As per you OA is C
Source: Test Prep

Dude,

If I knew why OA is C, I wouldn't be having a discussion here. :P

dmateer might be right in assuming that 'they' refer to costs. THere are certain rules related to when 'costs' is singular and when 'costs' is considered plural. But right now my thoughts are more channelled toward trying to make C correct than anything else.

But even if 'they' correctly refers to costs and costs is the subject of the first clause, one cannot ignore the tense 'have been', which should be set in past.

Any way - from this discussion I have a couple more questions.

1st - Isn't 'Soaring TV Costs' the subject of the first clause?

2nd - If 1st is true then doesn't the second clause correctly modifies the subject of the first clause (which is Soaring TV Costs in this case)?

Thus making B the correct choice?
Last edited by rohangupta83 on Mon Nov 24, 2008 7:15 am, edited 1 time in total.

Legendary Member
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 am
Thanked: 55 times
Followed by:1 members

by iamcste » Mon Nov 24, 2008 6:57 am
rohangupta83 wrote:
iamcste wrote:
skyline77 wrote:[

I think this is a GMATprep question. Think OA is B. But I choose C as well.
Rohan-why difference in OA and then subsequent discussions. As per you OA is C
Source: Test Prep

Dude,

If I knew why OA is C,
I meant as per skyline 77, OA is B and as per you OA is C. Why is this difference there

User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 1049
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Thanked: 113 times
Followed by:27 members
GMAT Score:710

by dmateer25 » Mon Nov 24, 2008 7:06 am
wouldn't there need to be a present participle of the verb (with an -ing ending) after have been for this to be a present perfect progressive??