BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Shoplifting vicious cycle - pls help

Expert replies
by auntsom » Sun Jul 27, 2008 1:02 am
When unscrupulous people shoplift, a viciuos cycle results. Retailers must raise their prices in order to make up for the lost sales, and the higher prices encourage more people to shoplift. This vicious cycle hurts honest consumers worst of all, because they have to pay higher prices.

The vicious cycle described above could not happen unless which of the following is trure?

A. Shoplifters usuall steal only items that they need but cannot afford.
B. Retailers do not take shoplifting losses into account when they initially set their prices.
C. The best way for retailers to address shoplifting is by punishing shoplifters to the fullest extent of the law.
D. Some people would shoplift no matter how low retailers set their prices.
E. It costs retailers more to pay security guards to prevent shoplifting than just to absorb the cost of occasional losses due to theft.

Perhaps I misunderstand something but I interpret question stem as ' if the correct answer choice happens, then shoplifting cycle continues to haapen' and then my thought and OA is in the opposite direction. So, can someone help explain how to attack this question, pls?

OA is B
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by sumant1808 » Sun Jul 27, 2008 3:56 am
Use principle of negation.....

Retailers take shoplifting losses into account when the set prices ...Acc to argument this the reason rates increase... thus if this is not true rates wont increase..shoplifting wont increase and thus no vicious cycle will occur.

A. Shoplifters usuall steal only items that they need but cannot afford.
(-) has no relation with cause effect...
B. Retailers do not take shoplifting losses into account when they initially set their prices.
(+)
C. The best way for retailers to address shoplifting is by punishing shoplifters to the fullest extent of the law.
(-) we are not concrened with steps taken to curb the effect
D. Some people would shoplift no matter how low retailers set their prices.
(-) Irrelevant
E. It costs retailers more to pay security guards to prevent shoplifting than just to absorb the cost of occasional losses due to theft.
(-) Out of scope
Terrified by the GMAT
Join the discussion

by reachac » Sun Jul 27, 2008 10:39 am
imo b
Join the discussion

by NSNguyen » Mon Aug 04, 2008 7:00 am
HI auntsom,
i think that we must understand the question fully before choose the option,
you can negate the question to understand,
it means that if which of the following is true, the vicious cycle could not happen? (what of following will stop the vicious cycle?)
A, specific ( Irrelevance)
B, this can make honest people do not shoplift
C, this can treat shoplifter, however, if the retail price is still high, there may be shoplifting,
D, E: OOS
Please share your idea and your reasoning :D
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org
Join the discussion

by peter.p.81 » Wed May 11, 2016 2:04 am
I would go for B as well. It seems the best and safest among the rest.
Join the discussion