Found my self fighting with the following question:
OG Quant. Review/PS Q131 looks as follows:
What I fully understand:In the sequence x0, x1, x2,...,xn each term from x1 to xk is 3 greater than the previous term, and each term from xk+1 to xn is 3 less than the previous term, where n and k are positive integers and k < n. If x0 = xn = 0 and xk = 15, what is the value of n?
(A) 5
(B) 6
(C) 9
(D) 10
(E) 15
That sounds all very logical to me. However, the rest of the explanation comes as follows:Since x0 = 0 and each term from x1 to xk is 3 greater than the previous term, then xk= 0+ (k)*(3). Since xk = 15, then 15=3k and k = 5.
In particular, I wonder about the expression in bold. Substituting the values is no problem for me. But how did they get to the expression? I tried noting down the elements of the sequence on a number line and found that xk+1 has to be 18. If I go from 18 to zero in steps of -3, I end up with a sequence of 7 elements. Taken 7 and 5 together I would have a sequence including a total of 12 elements. However, xk and xk+1 do not count towards the elements included in xn. Therefore, xn includes 12-2 elements = 10 elements. But this isnt really an explanation for the bold expression?Since each term from xk+1 to xn is 3 less than the previous term, then xn=xk-(n-k)*(3). Substituting the known values for xk,xn, and k gives 0=15-(n-5)*(3), from which it follows that 3n=30 and n=10.
Can anyone help?
Kind regards,
Tobi