Search found 10 matches
B cannot be correct because it talks about products, which are made out of old trees, decomposing. Irrelevant since the argument never talks about the products made from trees. IMO E is correct. The argument concludes that harvesting old trees will reduce carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. E weaken...
- by shoh0ku
Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:25 am- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: Logging industry
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2124
B cannot be correct because it talks about products, which are made out of old trees, decomposing. Irrelevant since the argument never talks about the products made from trees. IMO E is correct. The argument concludes that harvesting old trees will reduce carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. E weaken...
- by shoh0ku
Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:23 am- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: Logging industry
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2124
why D? same logic as madhur_ahuja why not C? C provides evidence that more and more people wanted 2nd hand homes in the past 10 years. However, the argument discusses everything in the present and future: "85% of the magazine’s readers are planning to buy a second home over the next few years&q...
- by shoh0ku
Mon Aug 10, 2009 7:24 am- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: help me out
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3546
IMO D
D shows that restrictions on smoking did not lead to increased revenue, because restaurants maintained smoking areas.
- by shoh0ku
Mon Aug 03, 2009 8:36 am- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: Vorland
- Replies: 12
- Views: 7463
IMO A
D cannot be correct because the conclusion is about sales, but D focuses on costs, which is irrelevant to sales.
- by shoh0ku
Mon Aug 03, 2009 8:24 am- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: Company X Revenue
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2893
IMO B B states that no succesful strategy intensifies loneliness. The statement states that hobby many exacerbates/intensifies loneliness. Thus, leading to the conclusion that hobby is not a successful strategy. D cannot be the correct answer because it talks about other strategies that are more suc...
- by shoh0ku
Mon Aug 03, 2009 6:52 am- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: Shy Aadolescents
- Replies: 16
- Views: 3915
IMO - C.
The statement centers around environmentalists' opinions: relating ECONOMIC appeals/benefits/etc. with destruction of natural environments.
C - logically refers to the statement by discussing environmentalists' opinions toward ECONOMIC rationals.
- by shoh0ku
Mon Jul 20, 2009 10:22 am- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: some interesting CRs
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2422
- by shoh0ku
Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:59 am- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: global warming
- Replies: 16
- Views: 3293
IMO - A The statement states that the "INCIDENCE" / NUMBER of injuries on ski resorts' slopes was greater in 1950 than in 1980 (9 injuries to 3 injuries). A - provides a conflict by stating that the NUMBER of injuries on ski resorts' slopes was greater in 1980 than in 1950. B is incorrect ...
- by shoh0ku
Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:44 am- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: Need Explanation
- Replies: 11
- Views: 2537
IMO E and definitely a tricky one to mentally visualize w/o writing it down on paper.
Given:
T > M;
Majority S > M;
Implied:
some/minority S <= M (T > M >= some/minority S);
Therefore:
Answer is E, T > some/minority S
- by shoh0ku
Mon Jul 20, 2009 7:50 am- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: 780+ CR's
- Replies: 160
- Views: 36603