Search found 33 matches
Excellent attitude, forge on and the best of luck to you.cks wrote:Tud,
You are right. I am working on it now.. "Fight till Death" On my 3rd attempt now..
Thanks
Tud
- by Tud
Wed Jan 30, 2008 4:26 pm- Forum: I just Beat The GMAT!
- Topic: Did not beat it.. A 350
- Replies: 6
- Views: 7587
Re: Did not beat it.. A 350
I know did not do well on the math That explains part of the problem. But during my exam i was quite and calm and did not had any anxiety. I already gone threw the OG and kaplan and Princeton resources. I don't want to sound harsh, but are you sure you did well on the verbal section? The two senten...
- by Tud
Thu Jan 24, 2008 12:29 pm- Forum: I just Beat The GMAT!
- Topic: Did not beat it.. A 350
- Replies: 6
- Views: 7587
Re: 700, barely studied, my story
today (1/22) i took the gmat here in pasadena CA for the first time. i got a 700, which was pretty much my goal. my thoughts: AWA is the easiest of the 3 sections. prior to this gmat test i had done only 2 practice AWA questions. my advice to future gmat test takers is that you don't overstudy for ...
- by Tud
Wed Jan 23, 2008 8:50 am- Forum: I just Beat The GMAT!
- Topic: 700, barely studied, my story
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3399
I've always been fairly good at math, so when I did the practice questions I checked the answer key, if I got one wrong I'd try to do it again rather than skip right to the explanation. A lot of times I was able to get the answer right the second time and it was just that I read the question wrong a...
- by Tud
Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:06 am- Forum: GMAT Strategy
- Topic: Taking GMAT on 22nd (will report back)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1553
Re: Great idea
I never even thought of that!!! That is such a great suggestion. I have a very very very bad temper and blow up easily. Therefore, I would probably do pretty bad on the actual test if I kept getting distracted because the adrenaline and testosterone would mess it all up for me. But earplugs are an ...
- by Tud
Wed Jan 16, 2008 3:53 pm- Forum: I just Beat The GMAT!
- Topic: 760 but horrible AWA :-(
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3578
Congratulations. I think you're the only person besides me who bought the McGraw-Hill book. ;) Well to be honest, I took it out of the library for 3 weeks rather than buying it. It came with the cd with the practice tests on it so it was all good. I got between 620 and 640 on the 6 tests, so I was ...
- by Tud
Wed Jan 16, 2008 3:48 pm- Forum: I just Beat The GMAT!
- Topic: Just finished with a 710
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1948
Just finished with a 710
Q-49 V-38 Total 710 - 93rd Percentile I started out the day by driving downtown to the testing center on snow covered roads. It took about 40 minues to get there and I at 8:40, my test was scheduled for 9:30. I parked the car and gathered my thinks when I realized I didn't have my wallet, which mean...
- by Tud
Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:21 am- Forum: I just Beat The GMAT!
- Topic: Just finished with a 710
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1948
It's a yes or no question, and statement 1 is insuff because x could be -0.3, which would be no, or it could be 0.5, which is yes. So statement 1 on it's own is insuff to answer the yes or no question.
Answer B
- by Tud
Wed Jan 09, 2008 9:07 am- Forum: Data Sufficiency
- Topic: Data Sufficiency Problem-Solving for x
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2177
That's good to know, so we can assume that when they say the difference of a and b they mean a-b only.sankruth wrote:The OA is D
St 2 is intrpreted as (l - w) only!
- by Tud
Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:26 pm- Forum: Data Sufficiency
- Topic: A basic quant question
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2493
That's interesting. Statement 1 is sufficient, but statement 2 will depend on how you interpret "difference". The official answer would tell us how they interpret it, so....., what's the OA?
- by Tud
Sun Jan 06, 2008 12:27 pm- Forum: Data Sufficiency
- Topic: A basic quant question
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2493
Yes, on the 15th, how about you?cris wrote:You write in 11 days means you are taking the exam in 11 days?
Thanks.Good luck!
- by Tud
Sat Jan 05, 2008 5:20 am- Forum: Data Sufficiency
- Topic: DS - Wages
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2435
Actually I originally looked at it like you did, then I thought up the equation to try and confirm that I was on the right track. :) I have a tendency to skip steps in my head, which gets me to the answer quicker, unforatunately it's not always the right one. Right now I'm running around 620-640 on ...
- by Tud
Fri Jan 04, 2008 7:17 pm- Forum: Data Sufficiency
- Topic: DS - Wages
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2435
I agree that it's A)
Let X=Mark's original wage
Jack's original wage =X+5
Mark's new wage = (1.06)X
Jack's new wage = (1.06)(X+5) = 1.06X + 5.30
Difference between Jack's new wage and Mark's new wage = Y
Y=(1.06X + 5.30) - 1.06X
Y=$5.30
- by Tud
Fri Jan 04, 2008 5:51 pm- Forum: Data Sufficiency
- Topic: DS - Wages
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2435
- by Tud
Fri Jan 04, 2008 4:26 pm- Forum: Problem Solving
- Topic: Question PS129 from Yellow Review Book
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3201
I'm not Specialk, nor do I play them on television, but the answer choices are:cris wrote:Specialk could you please write the answer choices....some times is better to have them.
Thanks!
A) 290/12.5 and 290/11.4
B) 295/12 and 284/11.4
C) 284/12 and 295/12
D) 284/12.5 and 295/11.4
E) 295/12.5 and 284/11.4
- by Tud
Fri Jan 04, 2008 3:50 pm- Forum: Problem Solving
- Topic: Question PS129 from Yellow Review Book
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3201