Hi,
Please help. I found few links but people have discussed about "because of Vs due". I am confused between D and E.
E looks parallel but explanation says it is wordy and bodies must be bodies' because of possessive case.
Can someone please elaborate on bodies must be bodies' with an example ?
Two new studies indicate that many people become obese more due to the fact that their bodies burn calories too slowly than overeating.
A) due to the fact that their bodies burn calories too slowly than overeating
B )due to their bodies burning calories too slowly than to eating too much
C )because their bodies bum calories too slowly than that they are overeaters
D )because their bodies bum calories too slowly than because they eat too much
E) because of their bodies burning calories too slowly than because of their eating too much
OA D
Thanks & Regards
Sachin
SC-verbal review #98
This topic has expert replies
- sachin_yadav
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:52 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 5 times
- Followed by:1 members
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1578
- Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:49 am
- Thanked: 82 times
- Followed by:9 members
- GMAT Score:720
There is a parallel construction : more ... than ad so the two constructs should be parallel.
B and C break that parallelism, in B : more due to... than to... is enough to discredit this option, while in C more because...than that, is obviously not parallel.
A is obviously wordy, dure to the fact that ...
So DE are left as contenders. Looks close. E seems to have a passive construction, their eating too much, and their bodies burning calory too slowly. Even without going in possessive discussion of *bodies* vs *bodies'*, since D contains an active cnstruct without any noticeable issue, I will choose D and move on.
,
B and C break that parallelism, in B : more due to... than to... is enough to discredit this option, while in C more because...than that, is obviously not parallel.
A is obviously wordy, dure to the fact that ...
So DE are left as contenders. Looks close. E seems to have a passive construction, their eating too much, and their bodies burning calory too slowly. Even without going in possessive discussion of *bodies* vs *bodies'*, since D contains an active cnstruct without any noticeable issue, I will choose D and move on.
,
Charged up again to beat the beast ![Smile :)](./images/smilies/smile.png)
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/smile.png)
- sachin_yadav
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:52 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 5 times
- Followed by:1 members
Thanks for your reply.maihuna wrote:There is a parallel construction : more ... than ad so the two constructs should be parallel.
B and C break that parallelism, in B : more due to... than to... is enough to discredit this option, while in C more because...than that, is obviously not parallel.
A is obviously wordy, dure to the fact that ...
So DE are left as contenders. Looks close. E seems to have a passive construction, their eating too much, and their bodies burning calory too slowly. Even without going in possessive discussion of *bodies* vs *bodies'*, since D contains an active cnstruct without any noticeable issue, I will choose D and move on.
,
If this is a case then it is easy. I never thought about eliminating option E on the basis of passive voice.
But as book says "bodies must be bodies' because the possessive case is required before a gerund". In this case bodies burning
What if any other question comes asking about the same possessive case then what ?
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1574
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
- Thanked: 88 times
- Followed by:13 members
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1578
- Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:49 am
- Thanked: 82 times
- Followed by:9 members
- GMAT Score:720
yes, as long as there is an correct active voice opyion you may discard the passive one, but in few cases passives are an credited options, particularly in scenario where agent is not meaningful, such as in scientific/technical one.
That said, you can safely eliminate an option based on voice, if active one's are error free.
yes, in given scenario, that u explained *bodies'* is reuired.
[quote="sachin_yadav
Thanks for your reply.
If this is a case then it is easy. I never thought about eliminating option E on the basis of passive voice.
But as book says "bodies must be bodies' because the possessive case is required before a gerund". In this case bodies burning
What if any other question comes asking about the same possessive case then what ?[/quote]
That said, you can safely eliminate an option based on voice, if active one's are error free.
yes, in given scenario, that u explained *bodies'* is reuired.
[quote="sachin_yadav
Thanks for your reply.
If this is a case then it is easy. I never thought about eliminating option E on the basis of passive voice.
But as book says "bodies must be bodies' because the possessive case is required before a gerund". In this case bodies burning
What if any other question comes asking about the same possessive case then what ?[/quote]
Charged up again to beat the beast ![Smile :)](./images/smilies/smile.png)
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/smile.png)
- sachin_yadav
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:52 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 5 times
- Followed by:1 members
Thanks Nagendra.
If i think "their bodies burning calories" (incorrect)
"their bodies' burning calories" (This makes sense)
I was missing something.
Thanks once again Nagendra for your wonderful explanation. Really appreciate for your help.
Regards
Sachin
If i think "their bodies burning calories" (incorrect)
"their bodies' burning calories" (This makes sense)
I was missing something.
Thanks once again Nagendra for your wonderful explanation. Really appreciate for your help.
Regards
Sachin
- gmat_perfect
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1083
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:38 pm
- Thanked: 127 times
- Followed by:14 members
Because X than because Y, where X and Y are clauses, and option D has done this.sachin_yadav wrote:Hi,
Please help. I found few links but people have discussed about "because of Vs due". I am confused between D and E.
E looks parallel but explanation says it is wordy and bodies must be bodies' because of possessive case.
Can someone please elaborate on bodies must be bodies' with an example ?
Two new studies indicate that many people become obese more due to the fact that their bodies burn calories too slowly than overeating.
A) due to the fact that their bodies burn calories too slowly than overeating
B )due to their bodies burning calories too slowly than to eating too much
C )because their bodies bum calories too slowly than that they are overeaters
D )because their bodies bum calories too slowly than because they eat too much
E) because of their bodies burning calories too slowly than because of their eating too much
OA D
Thanks & Regards
Sachin
- vinni.k
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 4:27 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 6 times
- Followed by:2 members
- GMAT Score:620
Hi All,
Is there any other good reason to eliminate E ? Book says wordiness and awkward, but in my opinion this choice is perfectly parallel. I read in the above post about passive construction, but i have seen that most of the passive sentences are correct.
Any valid reason to eliminate E. I will definitely stumble if both D and E are given in the exam. I will fall. This is for sure.
Please expert reply on this.
Thanks & Regards
Vinni
Is there any other good reason to eliminate E ? Book says wordiness and awkward, but in my opinion this choice is perfectly parallel. I read in the above post about passive construction, but i have seen that most of the passive sentences are correct.
Any valid reason to eliminate E. I will definitely stumble if both D and E are given in the exam. I will fall. This is for sure.
Please expert reply on this.
Thanks & Regards
Vinni
- avik.ch
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 1:15 am
- Thanked: 149 times
- Followed by:32 members
- GMAT Score:760
It lacks an action verbvinni.k wrote:Hi All,
Is there any other good reason to eliminate E ? Book says wordiness and awkward, but in my opinion this choice is perfectly parallel. I read in the above post about passive construction, but i have seen that most of the passive sentences are correct.
Any valid reason to eliminate E. I will definitely stumble if both D and E are given in the exam. I will fall. This is for sure.
Please expert reply on this.
Thanks & Regards
Vinni
because of their bodies burning calories too slowly than
because of their eating too much
Where is the verb ?
- vinni.k
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 4:27 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 6 times
- Followed by:2 members
- GMAT Score:620
Thanks avik.ch.avik.ch wrote: It lacks an action verb
because of their bodies burning calories too slowly than
because of their eating too much
Where is the verb ?
What is "burning calories" and "eating too much" doing in (E) ?
If these are not action verbs, then are these nouns modifying their ?
Looking forward to your reply.
Regards
Vinni
- avik.ch
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 1:15 am
- Thanked: 149 times
- Followed by:32 members
- GMAT Score:760
Its adjective - participles.vinni.k wrote: What is "burning calories" and "eating too much" doing in (E) ?
If these are not action verbs, then are these nouns modifying their ?
Looking forward to your reply.
Regards
Vinni
Ing verbs without an auxiliary verbs are always an adjective.
The child is playing on the field. --- "is playing" is the main verb
The child playing on the field is mine. --- "is" is the main verb , "playing" is a participle here.
Please note : At times even ing-verb with an auxiliary verb can act an adjective. This is dependent on the surrounding words.
Jessica is charming to the reporters. -- "charming" is an adjective predicate, "is" is the main verb, "to the reporters" is an adverb of reception.
Jessica is charming the reporters. -- "is charming" is a main verb,"the reporters" is the object.
Hope this helps !!
- vikram4689
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1325
- Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 6:24 am
- Thanked: 105 times
- Followed by:14 members
Vinni,
Construction is "Independent Clause,Dependent Clause" and E lacks verb due to which second part does not remain a Dependent Clause.
For more info on Participle - https://www.beatthegmat.com/football-tea ... tml#452765
Construction is "Independent Clause,Dependent Clause" and E lacks verb due to which second part does not remain a Dependent Clause.
For more info on Participle - https://www.beatthegmat.com/football-tea ... tml#452765
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/wink.png)
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/wink.png)