Sentence Correction

Q. That twenty-one ceramic dog figurines were discovered during the excavating of a 1,000-year-old Hohokam village in Tempe, Arizona, has nearly doubled the number of these artifacts known to exist.

A. That twenty-one ceramic dog figurines were discovered during the excavating
B. Twenty-one ceramic dog figurines discovered at the excavation
C. Discovering twenty-one ceramic dog figurines at the excavating
D. Ceramic dog figurines, twenty-one of which were discovered during excavating
E The discovery of twenty-one ceramic dog figurines during the excavation

E According to me

why A is wrong

duongthang wrote:why A is wrong

IMO E:

In A there is no independent clause hence not a valid sentence.

Vinayak

in A "that " is subject

A is grammatical

why A is wrong

"excavating of" is unidiomatic.

"excavation of" is fine.

E for me too.

Discovery of... , HAS has nearly doubled the number of these artifacts known to exist.

I looked at the sentence the short way.
The discovery of twenty-one ceramic dog figurines, has nearly doubled the number of these artifacts known to exist.

A. That twenty-one ceramic dog figurines were discovered during the excavating (during the excavating is incorrect, should be during the excavation…..Also the subject does not modify what comes after the comma)

B. Twenty-one ceramic dog figurines discovered at the excavation (should be during the excavation……..at the excavation changes the meaning……..Also, the subject should be singular to match with has)

C. Discovering twenty-one ceramic dog figurines at the excavating (should be during the excavation)

D. Ceramic dog figurines, twenty-one of which were discovered during excavating (the subject should be singular, during the excavating is incorrect)

E The discovery of twenty-one ceramic dog figurines during the excavation (works)

ILULA08 wrote:Q. That twenty-one ceramic dog figurines were discovered during the excavating of a 1,000-year-old Hohokam village in Tempe, Arizona, has nearly doubled the number of these artifacts known to exist.

A. That twenty-one ceramic dog figurines were discovered during the excavating
B. Twenty-one ceramic dog figurines discovered at the excavation
C. Discovering twenty-one ceramic dog figurines at the excavating
D. Ceramic dog figurines, twenty-one of which were discovered during excavating
E The discovery of twenty-one ceramic dog figurines during the excavation

Choice E

In the sentence has nearly doubled is a singular verb and requries a singular subject, The discovery in "E" is the only singular of choices.

in A, that clause is subject.

is this wrong

pls, explain why A is wrong

the sentence after comma is, " has nearly doubled the number "
So ask urself, what has actually doubled the number ??
it cannot be Ceramic dog figurines.
it has to be " The discovery " which has doubled the number..

Someone privately asked me to explain this question, so I'm reviving it:

ILULA08 wrote:Q. That twenty-one ceramic dog figurines were discovered during the excavating of a 1,000-year-old Hohokam village in Tempe, Arizona, has nearly doubled the number of these artifacts known to exist.

A. That twenty-one ceramic dog figurines were discovered during the excavating
B. Twenty-one ceramic dog figurines discovered at the excavation
C. Discovering twenty-one ceramic dog figurines at the excavating
D. Ceramic dog figurines, twenty-one of which were discovered during excavating
E The discovery of twenty-one ceramic dog figurines during the excavation

Some of the above posters are right to point out that there isn't a grammatical problem with (A) because its subject is the noun clause that twenty-one ceramic dog figurines were discovered during the excavating of a 1,000-year-old Hohokam village in Tempe, Arizona. Yes, this entire clause is the subject, and as it begins with "that" it's singular, agreeing with the verb "has." However, it's extraordinarily awkward to use such a long noun clause to begin a sentence. Furthermore, noun clauses rarely make sense as the subjects of transitive verbs, and are much more often the subjects of the verb "to be" than anything else. An example of a clear usage of a noun clause is this:

"That the problems are difficult is clear; what is interesting is how to answer them."

Both noun clauses ("that..." and "what...") are short and are the subject of the verb "to be" -- in the second part of the sentence, the first noun clause, "what...", is properly equated to another noun clause, "how...." Thus these are good sentences. The original one here, however, isn't ideal, and if there is a choice that uses a simple noun and modifiers instead of the long awkward noun clause to be the subject of "has doubled," as long as that choice makes no further errors, it will be the ideal choice.

Of the remaining choices, it's necessary to keep the subject singular, so that it agrees with the singular verb "has" that isn't underlined and therefore can't change. (B) and (D) both make the subject "figurines," which is plural, and therefore need to be eliminated.

(C) is awkward because gerunds are similar to noun clauses in that it's hard to make them logically the subject of transitive verbs -- was it really the act of "discovering" them? or rather the fact that they were discovered? -- and a noun, as in (E), would be far better. Furthermore, it's rarely correct to use a gerund after a preposition, so "at the excavating" in (C) should raise some eyebrows, while "during the excavation" in (E) is, again, far superior.

Thus (E) is the correct answer.

Lovely explanation! Understood it properly now.Thanks

great explanation! thanks Adam