BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

sandwich

Expert replies
by Deepthi Subbu » Mon Aug 22, 2011 9:31 pm
Sales at a local sandwich shop have been declining steadily since a health food restaurant opened its doors for business on the same block three months ago. The owner of the sandwich shop concludes that the best way to raise sales back to prior levels is to offer special sandwich prices that compete with the low prices at the health food restaurant.

Which of the following assumptions helps to justify the owner's conclusion?

a.Sales at the sandwich shop reached an all-time high six months ago.

b.The sandwich shop's prices are currently higher than those of a similar shop located in a neighboring town.

c.The sandwich shop does not currently offer any healthful food items.

d.The health food restaurant is running its special prices as a temporary promotion and will be raising its prices at the end of the year.

e.Local consumers prefer the food at the sandwich shop to the food at the health food restaurant.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Geva@EconomistGMAT » Mon Aug 22, 2011 11:33 pm
Deepthi Subbu wrote:Sales at a local sandwich shop have been declining steadily since a health food restaurant opened its doors for business on the same block three months ago. The owner of the sandwich shop concludes that the best way to raise sales back to prior levels is to offer special sandwich prices that compete with the low prices at the health food restaurant.

Which of the following assumptions helps to justify the owner's conclusion?

a.Sales at the sandwich shop reached an all-time high six months ago.

b.The sandwich shop's prices are currently higher than those of a similar shop located in a neighboring town.

c.The sandwich shop does not currently offer any healthful food items.

d.The health food restaurant is running its special prices as a temporary promotion and will be raising its prices at the end of the year.

e.Local consumers prefer the food at the sandwich shop to the food at the health food restaurant.
answer is E. Careful identification of what you need to do is crucial here: you're looking for something that will justify the conclusion that lowering prices will bring back customers. what is the author assuming? By saying "If I lower prices, they will come", the owner is assuming that price is the deciding issue - the real cause as to why people are buying at the health shop and not his sandwich shop. There are many ways to WEAKEN this - perhaps people are buying at the health shop because his sandwiches are not perceived as healthy, or because the health food tastes better, or because the other place has a hot waitress, or any other cause OTHER than price. So in order to do the reverse and STRENGTHEN his conclusion, the author must assume that "there's no reason other than price" to go to the health shop. E eliminates such a potential reason - the people like his sandwiches, actually prefer them to the health food place, so the reason his sales have dropped is not that they don't like the food - which strengthens the conclusion that price is indeed the deciding issue, and that lowering prices will bring customers flocking back to the sandwich shop.
Geva
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT
1-888-780-GMAT
https://www.mastergmat.com
Join the discussion

by killer1387 » Tue Aug 23, 2011 2:13 am
hey Geva,
Could you please help me out by explaining what's the problem with option B.


thanx
Join the discussion

by Geva@EconomistGMAT » Tue Aug 23, 2011 2:53 am
killer1387 wrote:hey Geva,
Could you please help me out by explaining what's the problem with option B.


thanx
What's right about B?
Geva
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT
1-888-780-GMAT
https://www.mastergmat.com
Join the discussion

by Geva@EconomistGMAT » Tue Aug 23, 2011 3:36 am
killer1387 wrote:hey Geva,
Could you please help me out by explaining what's the problem with option B.


thanx
If you cannot tell yourself clearly why the answer justifies the owner's conclusion other than "it discusses price", then that's already a sign that you're talking yourself into choosing a red herring. The fact that the sandwhich shop's prices are higher than a similar shop in a neighboring town may seem to indicate that the owner's prices are high compared to the benchmark, but that's not an assumption that the author makes to justify his conclusion - it's merely a strengthening fact, and not a very good one (the other shop in the neighboring town could be exceptionally cheap, or running a temporary special).

You are asked which of the following assumptions help justify the conclusion: if we assume that the people like his sandwiches (yet still go to the health shop), that strengthens the conclusion that price is the problem.
Geva
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT
1-888-780-GMAT
https://www.mastergmat.com
Join the discussion

by killer1387 » Tue Aug 23, 2011 4:04 am
Thanx Geva
actually i was confused on the line of a level or benchmark. Now its clear.
Join the discussion

by saketk » Thu Aug 25, 2011 4:06 am
killer1387 wrote:hey Geva,
Could you please help me out by explaining what's the problem with option B.


thanx
B talks about the shop in the neighboring town which is not relevant to this question. We have to make our comparision between the new shop in the same block and the local shop.
Join the discussion

by thestartupguy » Thu Aug 25, 2011 4:30 am
Hi Geva,

I am confused. Can you tell me why it can't be D?
Join the discussion

by Geva@EconomistGMAT » Thu Aug 25, 2011 4:51 am
msr4mba wrote:Hi Geva,

I am confused. Can you tell me why it can't be D?
Because it's irrelevant. Even if I assume that the restaurants low prices are temporary, how does that strengthen the conclusion that if I lower my prices, my sales will go back to what they were?
Geva
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT
1-888-780-GMAT
https://www.mastergmat.com
Join the discussion

by artistocrat » Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:03 pm
"or because the other place has a hot waitress"

Screw the GMAT, where is the sandwich shop?
Join the discussion