BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

salt deposit

Expert replies
by mehrasa » Fri Oct 07, 2011 5:30 am
The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans. Clearly, therefore, by taking the resulting increase in salt levels in the oceans over the past hundred years and then determining how many centuries of such increases it would have taken the oceans to reach current salt levels from a hypothetical initial salt-free state, the maximum age of the Earth's oceans can be accurately estimated.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) The quantities of dissolved salts deposited by rivers in the Earth's oceans have not been unusually large during the past hundred years.
(B) At any given time, all the Earth's rivers have about the same salt levels.
(C) There are salts that leach into the Earth's oceans directly from the ocean floor.
(D) There is no method superior to that based on salt levels for estimating the maximum age of the Earth's oceans.
(E) None of the salts carried into the Earth's oceans by rivers are used up by biological activity in the oceans.


OA after discussion
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by mukgera » Fri Oct 07, 2011 6:52 pm
mehrasa wrote:The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans. Clearly, therefore, by taking the resulting increase in salt levels in the oceans over the past hundred years and then determining how many centuries of such increases it would have taken the oceans to reach current salt levels from a hypothetical initial salt-free state, the maximum age of the Earth's oceans can be accurately estimated.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) The quantities of dissolved salts deposited by rivers in the Earth's oceans have not been unusually large during the past hundred years.-- Doesn't look like an assumption
(B) At any given time, all the Earth's rivers have about the same salt levels.-- correct -- because river Salt level might be different during the centuries.
(C) There are salts that leach into the Earth's oceans directly from the ocean floor. -- This phenomenon would also be happening when we are taking the sample for 100 years.
(D) There is no method superior to that based on salt levels for estimating the maximum age of the Earth's oceans. -- Not relevent
(E) None of the salts carried into the Earth's oceans by rivers are used up by biological activity in the oceans. -- Same as C.
OA please ?


OA after discussion
Join the discussion

by theforrestgump » Fri Oct 07, 2011 11:13 pm
mehrasa wrote:The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans. Clearly, therefore, by taking the resulting increase in salt levels in the oceans over the past hundred years and then determining how many centuries of such increases it would have taken the oceans to reach current salt levels from a hypothetical initial salt-free state, the maximum age of the Earth's oceans can be accurately estimated.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) The quantities of dissolved salts deposited by rivers in the Earth's oceans have not been unusually large during the past hundred years.
(B) At any given time, all the Earth's rivers have about the same salt levels.
(C) There are salts that leach into the Earth's oceans directly from the ocean floor.
(D) There is no method superior to that based on salt levels for estimating the maximum age of the Earth's oceans.
(E) None of the salts carried into the Earth's oceans by rivers are used up by biological activity in the oceans.


OA after discussion
[spoiler]
A[/spoiler]
Join the discussion

by Ilana@EconomistGMAT » Sun Oct 09, 2011 6:53 am
B is incorrect, because we are interested in the accumulation in the oceans, and not on the contribution of the different tributaries (rivers) that flow into the ocean. Salt could be differently distributed in different tributaries, but still contribute to the same total increase of salt levels.

A is correct because an extrapolation is made based on the past 100 years. If the past one hundred years are not representative of the increases in geological history (i.e. the increases have not been UNUSUALLY large), the extrapolation is invalid.
Join the discussion

by adi_800 » Fri Oct 14, 2011 10:10 am
Adding one more assumption just to see how the question can be set up..:)

Oceans do not get salts from any source other than river.
Negate this -> Oceans get salts from sources other than river. If this is true, then one can not accurately predict the age of the oceans as this additional sources would yield result that are too big or too low..

Please lemme know whether this is a valid assumption !!
:)
Join the discussion