BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Running for President

Expert replies
by DhruvXVII » Sun Jul 31, 2011 6:36 am
Prominent business executives often play active roles in United States presidential campaigns as fundraisers or backroom strategists but few actually seek to become president themselves. Throughout history the great majority of those who have sought to become president have been lawyers, military leaders, or full-time politicians. This is understandable, for the personality and skills that make for success in business do not make for success in politics. Business is largely hierarchical, whereas politics is coordinative; as a result, business executives tend to be uncomfortable with compromises and power sharing, which are inherent in politics.

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the proposed explanation of why business executives do not run for president?

(A) Many of the most active presidential fundraisers and backroom strategists are themselves politicians.
(B) Military leaders are generally no more comfortable with compromises and power sharing than are business executives.
(C) Some of the skills needed to become a successful lawyer are different from some of those needed to become a successful military leader.
(D) Some former presidents have engaged in business ventures after leaving office
(E) Some hierarchically structured companies have been major financial supporters of candidates for president.


OA B
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by dinaroneo » Mon Aug 01, 2011 5:57 am
proposed explanation: BE tend to be uncomfortable with compromises and power sharing, which are inherent in politics ( i .e. Military leaders and lawyers are comfortable)

thus only B breaks the argument by saying : Military leaders are generally no more comfortable with compromises and power sharing than are business executives.

hence B
Join the discussion

by VivianKerr » Mon Aug 01, 2011 7:55 am
The explanation hinges on the idea that Business personality + skills are SEPARATE from politics.

Business = hierarchical
Politics = coordinative

Therefore, business execs uncomfortable w/compromise & powersharing.

We are looking for an answer choice that most concretely shows these ideas to be FALSE.

IMO:B.

If military leaders have often become president and they are ALSO uncomfortable w/compromise & powersharing, then it weakens the idea that this uncomfortability is the REASON business execs do not attempt to become president.
Vivian Kerr
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles

Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]

Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"! :-)
Join the discussion

by jaguar123 » Tue Aug 02, 2011 11:22 am
I chose B too. But didnt have a strong reason to eliminate D.
Can anyone please explain?
Join the discussion

by gauravgundal » Tue Aug 02, 2011 12:21 pm
@jaguar123

D - Some former presidents have engaged in business ventures after leaving office

Argument didn't say anything about presidents comfort level of getting involved in business ventures after leaving office.
it may be the case that some former presidents like to be involved or forced to do so..

Hope this will clear your doubt.

Let me know if you have any issue.
Join the discussion

by Ozlemg » Wed Aug 03, 2011 1:08 am
well done.
The more you suffer before the test, the less you will do so in the test! :)
Join the discussion

by jaguar123 » Wed Aug 03, 2011 1:16 am
Thats a good , sharp explanation. But should we be this careful in making inferences?

Some former presidents have engaged in business ventures after leaving office

Cant we assume, at least it is possible for politicians to move to business?
Which would in a way weaken?
Join the discussion