BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Ringtail opossums are an Australian wildlife species

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Fri Oct 13, 2017 12:55 pm
Ringtail opossums are an Australian wildlife species that is potentially endangered. A number of ringtail opossums that had been orphaned and subsequently raised in captivity were monitored after being returned to the wild. Seventy-five percent of these opossums were killed by foxes, a species not native to Australia. Conservationists concluded that the native ringtail opossum population was endangered not by a scarcity of food, as had been previously thought, but by non-native predator species against which the opossum had not developed natural defenses.
Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports the conservationists' argument?
(A) There are fewer non-native predator species that prey on the ringtail opossum than there are native species that prey on the ringtail opossum.
(B) Foxes, which were introduced into Australia over 200 years ago, adapted to the Australian climate less successfully than did some other foreign species.
(C) The ringtail opossums that were raised in captivity were fed a diet similar to that which ringtail opossums typically eat in the wild.
(D) Few of the species that compete with the ringtail opossum for food sources are native to Australia.
(E) Ringtail opossums that grow to adulthood in the wild defend themselves against foxes no more successfully than do ringtail opossums raised in captivity.

Will post Official Answer in two days. Need experts opinion first.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Tue Oct 17, 2017 8:32 am
lheiannie07 wrote:Ringtail opossums are an Australian wildlife species that is potentially endangered. A number of ringtail opossums that had been orphaned and subsequently raised in captivity were monitored after being returned to the wild. Seventy-five percent of these opossums were killed by foxes, a species not native to Australia. Conservationists concluded that the native ringtail opossum population was endangered not by a scarcity of food, as had been previously thought, but by non-native predator species against which the opossum had not developed natural defenses.
Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports the conservationists' argument?
(A) There are fewer non-native predator species that prey on the ringtail opossum than there are native species that prey on the ringtail opossum.
(B) Foxes, which were introduced into Australia over 200 years ago, adapted to the Australian climate less successfully than did some other foreign species.
(C) The ringtail opossums that were raised in captivity were fed a diet similar to that which ringtail opossums typically eat in the wild.
(D) Few of the species that compete with the ringtail opossum for food sources are native to Australia.
(E) Ringtail opossums that grow to adulthood in the wild defend themselves against foxes no more successfully than do ringtail opossums raised in captivity.

Will post Official Answer in two days. Need experts opinion first.
Conservationists' conclusion: ringtail opossums are endangered by non-native predator species the opossums haven't developed natural defenses against
Premise: 75% of opossums raised in captivity and returned to the wild were killed by foxes, which are not native to Australia.

Notice the language shift. The conclusion is about the opossums's endangerment in general , but the conclusion is about opossums raised in captivity and released. Therefore, the author has to assume that opossums raised in captivity are representative of the entire opossum population, and that wild opossums are no more adept at defending themselves than those raised in captivity. This is what E gives us,
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion

by BTGmoderatorDC » Wed Jan 10, 2018 12:32 am
DavidG@VeritasPrep wrote:
lheiannie07 wrote:Ringtail opossums are an Australian wildlife species that is potentially endangered. A number of ringtail opossums that had been orphaned and subsequently raised in captivity were monitored after being returned to the wild. Seventy-five percent of these opossums were killed by foxes, a species not native to Australia. Conservationists concluded that the native ringtail opossum population was endangered not by a scarcity of food, as had been previously thought, but by non-native predator species against which the opossum had not developed natural defenses.
Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports the conservationists' argument?
(A) There are fewer non-native predator species that prey on the ringtail opossum than there are native species that prey on the ringtail opossum.
(B) Foxes, which were introduced into Australia over 200 years ago, adapted to the Australian climate less successfully than did some other foreign species.
(C) The ringtail opossums that were raised in captivity were fed a diet similar to that which ringtail opossums typically eat in the wild.
(D) Few of the species that compete with the ringtail opossum for food sources are native to Australia.
(E) Ringtail opossums that grow to adulthood in the wild defend themselves against foxes no more successfully than do ringtail opossums raised in captivity.

Will post Official Answer in two days. Need experts opinion first.
Conservationists' conclusion: ringtail opossums are endangered by non-native predator species the opossums haven't developed natural defenses against
Premise: 75% of opossums raised in captivity and returned to the wild were killed by foxes, which are not native to Australia.

Notice the language shift. The conclusion is about the opossums's endangerment in general , but the conclusion is about opossums raised in captivity and released. Therefore, the author has to assume that opossums raised in captivity are representative of the entire opossum population, and that wild opossums are no more adept at defending themselves than those raised in captivity. This is what E gives us,
Thanks a lot!
Join the discussion