BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Researchers are studying plastics

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 75
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 7:55 am
Thanked: 1 times
by kvitkod » Sat Jun 11, 2011 8:05 am
Researchers are studying plastics that dissolve at differnt
rates, and they are finding that the so-called "quick
disintegration" plastics are taking more time to
deteriorate than they originally seemed.
(A) they originally seemed
(B) they seemed originally
(C) it seemed that they would originally
(D) it originally seemed
(E) it originally seemed they would

This is from Kaplan. OA is E. I went to D, since it seems more concise. For me THEY WOULD is implied so it is not necessary. please explain.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Legendary Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:10 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 45 times

by sameerballani » Sat Jun 11, 2011 8:11 am
kvitkod wrote:Researchers are studying plastics that dissolve at differnt rates, and they are finding that the so-called "quick disintegration" plastics are taking more time to deteriorate than they originally seemed.
(A) they originally seemed
(B) they seemed originally
(C) it seemed that they would originally
(D) it originally seemed
(E) it originally seemed they would

This is from Kaplan. OA is E. I went to D, since it seems more concise. For me THEY WOULD is implied so it is not necessary. please explain.
It creates an ambiguity . It seems as if time is being compared to plastics.
Better would be option E. Idiom: More X than Y. Both X and Y should be comparable..
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 75
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 7:55 am
Thanked: 1 times

by kvitkod » Sat Jun 11, 2011 10:02 am
It creates an ambiguity . It seems as if time is being compared to plastics.
Better would be option E. Idiom: More X than Y. Both X and Y should be comparable..
Sorry, sameerballani, I do not understand your explanation. I'm not sure that the More X than Y is an issue here, since we compare two cluses
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 amFollowed by: 53 members
Location: India
Thanked: 375 times

by Frankenstein » Sat Jun 11, 2011 10:12 am
Hi,
I believe 'they would' should be used because it is a hypothetical situation.

Expert opinion would be appreciated.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:10 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 45 times

by sameerballani » Sat Jun 11, 2011 11:41 pm
kvitkod wrote:
It(option D) creates an ambiguity .
It seems as if time is being compared to plastics.
Better would be option E.
Idiom used: More X than Y, which is correct, but we need to make sure Both X and Y should be comparable. That is either both of them should be time or both of them should be plastics.
Sorry, sameerballani, I do not understand your explanation. I'm not sure that the More X than Y is an issue here, since we compare two cluses
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1