Reading Comprehension

Sarah Meyers McGinty, in her useful new book Power Talk: Using Language to Build Authority and Influence, argues that while the simple lingual act of declaring power does not help a powerless person gain influence, well-considered linguistic techniques and maneuvers do. McGinty does not dispute the importance of factors such as expertise and ability in determining stature, but argues persuasively that these power determinants amount to little in a person unable to communicate effectively. Management theorists share McGinty's view that communication is essential for success and many surveys have shown that the ability to communicate effectively is the characteristic judged by managers to be most critical in determining promotability.

McGinty divides speech into two categories: "language from the center" and "language from the edge". In McGinty's words, "Language from the center makes a speaker sound like a leader." McGinty suggests that not only is language from the center for those in high positions of power, but it is also for those of lower ranks who wish to gain more power and credibility. A speaker using language from the center exhibits the following: he directs rather than responds; he makes statements rather than asks questions; he contradicts, argues, and disagrees; he uses his experience persuasively; and he maintains an air of impersonality in the workplace. McGinty suggests that the use of language from the center can alter or create a new balance of power. These assertions are supported by studies that show that people accept leadership from those they perceive to be experts.
Language from the edge stands in stark contrast to language from the center. Language from the edge is careful, exploratory, and inquiring. It is inclusive, deferential, and collaborative. A speaker using language from the edge responds rather than directs; asks questions; strives to make others feel heard and protected; and avoids argument. The main purpose of language from the center is to claim authority for a speaker, while language from the edge strives to build consensus and trust. McGinty argues that true power comes from a deep understanding of when to use which style and the ability to use both as necessary.

What distinguishes McGinty's discussion of effective communication is her focus on communication skills as a way of gaining power; this contrasts with most general management theory, which focuses on communication skills as a way of preventing misunderstandings, avoiding conflict, and fostering interpersonal relationships. McGinty, however, holds that language not only helps maintain relationships but also lends authority. According to Power Talk, effective communication skill "is an understanding of how situation shapes speech and how speech shapes situation" and "an understanding of how speech styles and the forces that affect those styles . . . can build your authority, and enhance your credibility and impact."



The primary focus of the passage is on which of the following?

Demonstrating the effectiveness of a certain framework in the business world
Explaining the advantages and disadvantages of a proposed approach to business communication
Analyzing the details of a controversial theory of business
Presenting a new model of business communication
Defending an outdated method of personnel management


Which of the following best describes the relation of the fourth paragraph to the passage a whole?

It summarizes and contextualizes McGinty's argument.
It questions the usefulness of McGinty's thesis.
It casts doubt on the universality of management theory.
It supports an alternative view of McGinty's proposal.
It offers additional support for McGinty's conclusions.

pl...confirm the Oa..!!!thanks.

1.D

2.E

D

and

C

OA please ?

thanks all...i am not sure for OA... i got it somewhere from net... i dont recall exactly where.

but there OA post was as C, A.

i also choosen D, E...!!

but now i think.. 1.D .2.A.... is correct.

thanks all.

7806 wrote:Sarah Meyers McGinty, in her useful new book Power Talk: Using Language to Build Authority and Influence, argues that while the simple lingual act of declaring power does not help a powerless person gain influence, well-considered linguistic techniques and maneuvers do. McGinty does not dispute the importance of factors such as expertise and ability in determining stature, but argues persuasively that these power determinants amount to little in a person unable to communicate effectively. Management theorists share McGinty's view that communication is essential for success and many surveys have shown that the ability to communicate effectively is the characteristic judged by managers to be most critical in determining promotability.

McGinty divides speech into two categories: "language from the center" and "language from the edge". In McGinty's words, "Language from the center makes a speaker sound like a leader." McGinty suggests that not only is language from the center for those in high positions of power, but it is also for those of lower ranks who wish to gain more power and credibility. A speaker using language from the center exhibits the following: he directs rather than responds; he makes statements rather than asks questions; he contradicts, argues, and disagrees; he uses his experience persuasively; and he maintains an air of impersonality in the workplace. McGinty suggests that the use of language from the center can alter or create a new balance of power. These assertions are supported by studies that show that people accept leadership from those they perceive to be experts.
Language from the edge stands in stark contrast to language from the center. Language from the edge is careful, exploratory, and inquiring. It is inclusive, deferential, and collaborative. A speaker using language from the edge responds rather than directs; asks questions; strives to make others feel heard and protected; and avoids argument. The main purpose of language from the center is to claim authority for a speaker, while language from the edge strives to build consensus and trust. McGinty argues that true power comes from a deep understanding of when to use which style and the ability to use both as necessary.

What distinguishes McGinty's discussion of effective communication is her focus on communication skills as a way of gaining power; this contrasts with most general management theory, which focuses on communication skills as a way of preventing misunderstandings, avoiding conflict, and fostering interpersonal relationships. McGinty, however, holds that language not only helps maintain relationships but also lends authority. According to Power Talk, effective communication skill "is an understanding of how situation shapes speech and how speech shapes situation" and "an understanding of how speech styles and the forces that affect those styles . . . can build your authority, and enhance your credibility and impact."



The primary focus of the passage is on which of the following?

Demonstrating the effectiveness of a certain framework in the business world
Explaining the advantages and disadvantages of a proposed approach to business communication
Analyzing the details of a controversial theory of business
Presenting a new model of business communication
Defending an outdated method of personnel management


Which of the following best describes the relation of the fourth paragraph to the passage a whole?

It summarizes and contextualizes McGinty's argument.
It questions the usefulness of McGinty's thesis.
It casts doubt on the universality of management theory.
It supports an alternative view of McGinty's proposal.
It offers additional support for McGinty's conclusions.

pl...confirm the Oa..!!!thanks.

I like the passage!

Initially I chose B and A.

If the OA for the first one is C, we have something to learn from this passage.

The whole passage does a descriptive analysis of a work (book).
The author does not even give any opinion of his own until the last para comes.
The author in the last para says that the book is in CONTRAST with most general theory of management. He admits to a certain extent that the book has some points that can be debated over. He assumes that the book is relatively controversial.

This new edition of the classic bestseller is a treasure for students who want to write vivid, distinctive essays and personal statements to support their college applications. The College Application Essay builds on what students have already learned in high school to strengthen their writing skills, and then applies those lessons to college applications in particular. In a friendly, conversational tone, the guide helps students find their voice and be "heard" on paper by emphasizing both the thinking process and the technical work of writing.


________________________________________________________________________________________________

Sarah Meyers McGinty, in her useful new book Power Talk: Using Language to Build Authority and Influence, argues that while the simple lingual act of declaring power does not help a powerless person gain influence, well-considered linguistic techniques and maneuvers do. McGinty does not dispute the importance of factors such as expertise and ability in determining stature, but argues persuasively that these power determinants amount to little in a person unable to communicate effectively. Management theorists share McGinty's view that communication is essential for success and many surveys have shown that the ability to communicate effectively is the characteristic judged by managers to be most critical in determining promotability.

McGinty divides speech into two categories: "language from the center" and "language from the edge". In McGinty's words, "Language from the center makes a speaker sound like a leader." McGinty suggests that not only is language from the center for those in high positions of power, but it is also for those of lower ranks who wish to gain more power and credibility. A speaker using language from the center exhibits the following: he directs rather than responds; he makes statements rather than asks questions; he contradicts, argues, and disagrees; he uses his experience persuasively; and he maintains an air of impersonality in the workplace. McGinty suggests that the use of language from the center can alter or create a new balance of power. These assertions are supported by studies that show that people accept leadership from those they perceive to be experts.
Language from the edge stands in stark contrast to language from the center. Language from the edge is careful, exploratory, and inquiring. It is inclusive, deferential, and collaborative. A speaker using language from the edge responds rather than directs; asks questions; strives to make others feel heard and protected; and avoids argument. The main purpose of language from the center is to claim authority for a speaker, while language from the edge strives to build consensus and trust. McGinty argues that true power comes from a deep understanding of when to use which style and the ability to use both as necessary.

What distinguishes McGinty's discussion of effective communication is her focus on communication skills as a way of gaining power; this contrasts with most general management theory, which focuses on communication skills as a way of preventing misunderstandings, avoiding conflict, and fostering interpersonal relationships. McGinty, however, holds that language not only helps maintain relationships but also lends authority. According to Power Talk, effective communication skill "is an understanding of how situation shapes speech and how speech shapes situation" and "an understanding of how speech styles and the forces that affect those styles . . . can build your authority, and enhance your credibility and impact."

Which of the following best describes the relation of the fourth paragraph to the passage a whole?

It summarizes and contextualizes McGinty's argument.
It questions the usefulness of McGinty's thesis.
It casts doubt on the universality of management theory.
It supports an alternative view of McGinty's proposal.
It offers additional support for McGinty's conclusions

For answering above question I was trapped by the sentence marked in bold.
Can anyone tell me why role does the keyword however play in the bold line marked above?
I end up concluding that author has some alternative view of McGinty's Proposal.
I thought the part after however (i.e. :Part starting from "According to Power Talk") in the above paragraph support the author view of saying something against McGinty's Proposal