• NEW! FREE Beat The GMAT Quizzes
Hundreds of Questions Highly Detailed Reporting Expert Explanations
• 7 CATs FREE!
If you earn 100 Forum Points

Engage in the Beat The GMAT forums to earn
100 points for $49 worth of Veritas practice GMATs FREE VERITAS PRACTICE GMAT EXAMS Earn 10 Points Per Post Earn 10 Points Per Thanks Earn 10 Points Per Upvote ## RC: OG-12: very specific doubt ##### This topic has 2 expert replies and 3 member replies ## RC: OG-12: very specific doubt After evidence was obtained in the 1920s that the universe is expanding, it became reasonable to ask: Will the universe continue to expand indefinitely, or is there enough mass in it for the mutual attraction of its constituents to bring this expansion to a halt? It can be calculated that the critical density of matter needed to brake the expansion and â€ścloseâ€ť the universe is equivalent to three hydrogen atoms per cubic meter. But the density of the observable universe-luminous matter in the form of galaxies-comes to only a fraction of this. If the expansion of the universe is to stop, there must be enough invisible matter in the universe to exceed the luminous matter in density by a factor of roughly 70. Our contribution to the search for this â€śmissing matterâ€ť has been to study the rotational velocity of galaxies at various distances from their center of rotation. It has been known for some time that outside the bright nucleus of a typical spiral galaxy luminosity falls off rapidly with distance from the center. If luminosity were a true indicator of mass, most of the mass would be concentrated toward the center. Outside the nucleus the rotational velocity would decrease geometrically with distance from the center, in conformity with Keplerâ€™s law. Instead we have found that the rotational velocity in spiral galaxies either remains constant with increasing distance from the center or increases slightly. This unexpected result indicates that the falloff in luminous mass with distance from the center is balanced by an increase in nonluminous mass. Our findings suggest that as much as 90 percent of the mass of the universe is not radiating at any wavelength with enough intensity to be detected on the Earth. Such dark matter could be in the form of extremely dim stars of low mass, of large planets like Jupiter, or of black holes, either small or massive. While it has not yet been determined whether this mass is sufficient to close the universe, some physicists consider it significant that estimates are converging on the critical value. 116. The authorsâ€™ study indicates that, in comparison with the outermost regions of a typical spiral galaxy, the region just outside the nucleus can be characterized as having (A) higher rotational velocity and higher luminosity (B) lower rotational velocity and higher luminosity (C) lower rotational velocity and lower luminosity (D) similar rotational velocity and higher luminosity (E) similar rotational velocity and similar luminosity I chose the correct answer . however, I am still having doubt on answer choice B. The portion of the passage says that "Instead we have found that the rotational velocity in spiral galaxies either remains constant with increasing distance from the center or increases slightly." Doesn't it also mean that the rotational velocity near the nucleus may also be lower than that in outermost region? Can someone please explain? Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Joined 16 Jul 2013 Posted: 234 messages Upvotes: 9 Target GMAT Score: 700+ In my opinion the answer is E, passage says "rotational velocity in spiral galaxies either remains constant with increasing distance from the center or increases slightly." it means that the rotational velocity either increases or remain constant. therefore it's A D E, but luminosity cannot increase as the distance is increasing ==> Just E can be the answer. Isn't E the OA? ### GMAT/MBA Expert GMAT Instructor Joined 28 Dec 2011 Posted: 768 messages Followed by: 138 members Upvotes: 387 buoyant wrote: 116. The authorsâ€™ study indicates that, in comparison with the outermost regions of a typical spiral galaxy, the region just outside the nucleus can be characterized as having (A) higher rotational velocity and higher luminosity (B) lower rotational velocity and higher luminosity (C) lower rotational velocity and lower luminosity (D) similar rotational velocity and higher luminosity (E) similar rotational velocity and similar luminosity I chose the correct answer . however, I am still having doubt on answer choice B. The portion of the passage says that "Instead we have found that the rotational velocity in spiral galaxies either remains constant with increasing distance from the center or increases slightly." Doesn't it also mean that the rotational velocity near the nucleus may also be lower than that in outermost region? Can someone please explain? Java_85 wrote: Isn't E the OA? First of all, Java_85, the passage very clearly states that "luminosity falls off rapidly with distance from the center." Thus, the "region just outside the nucleus" would have a high luminosity, higher than anything out toward the edge. Thus, we know we need an answer with "higher luminosity", (A), (B), or (D). As it happens, the OA = (D). Now, bouyant, what you ask is an excellent question. The text says: "the rotational velocity in spiral galaxies either remains constant with increasing distance from the center or increases slightly." So, a region toward the center would have a rotational velocity that is about the same or slightly lower than that toward the outer reaches. Two possibilities: (1) about the same, or (2) slightly lower. Now, think about (B) vs. (D) (B) lower rotational velocity (D) similar rotational velocity Which one of those includes both possibilities? Choice (B) definitely includes (2) but doesn't include (1). By contrast, choice (D) includes both (1) and (2), because both "slightly higher" and "slightly lower" are included in the idea of "similar". That's why the OA is a better answer. Mike _________________ Magoosh GMAT Instructor https://gmat.magoosh.com/ Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Joined 02 Mar 2013 Posted: 106 messages Upvotes: 4 Yes. That makes sense. Thank you for the nice explanation,Mike ! Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts Joined 13 Sep 2016 Posted: 1 messages Target GMAT Score: 750 [quote="buoyant"][color=blue]116. The authorsâ€™ study indicates that, in comparison with the outermost regions of a typical spiral galaxy, the region just outside the nucleus can be characterized as having (A) higher rotational velocity and higher luminosity (B) lower rotational velocity and higher luminosity (C) lower rotational velocity and lower luminosity (D) similar rotational velocity and higher luminosity (E) similar rotational velocity and similar luminosity[/color] I chose the correct answer . however, I am still having doubt on answer choice B. The portion of the passage says that "Instead we have found that the rotational velocity in spiral galaxies either remains constant with increasing distance from the center or increases slightly." Doesn't it also mean that the rotational velocity near the nucleus may also be lower than that in outermost region? Can someone please explain?[/quote] [quote="Java_85"]Isn't E the OA?[/quote] [quote="Mike@Magoosh"]First of all, [b]Java_85[/b], the passage very clearly states that "[color=darkblue]luminosity falls off rapidly with distance from the center[/color]." Thus, the "[color=darkblue]region just outside the nucleus[/color]" would have a high luminosity, higher than anything out toward the edge. Thus, we know we need an answer with "[color=darkblue]higher luminosity[/color]", [b](A)[/b], [b](B)[/b], or [b](D)[/b]. As it happens, the OA = [spoiler][b](D)[/b][/spoiler]. Now, [b]bouyant[/b], what you ask is an excellent question. The text says: "[color=darkblue]the rotational velocity in spiral galaxies either remains constant with increasing distance from the center or increases slightly[/color]." So, a region toward the center would have a rotational velocity that is about the same or slightly lower than that toward the outer reaches. Two possibilities: (1) about the same, or (2) slightly lower. Now, think about [b](B)[/b] vs. [b](D)[/b] [color=darkblue](B) lower rotational velocity (D) similar rotational velocity [/color] Which one of those includes both possibilities? Choice [b](B)[/b] definitely includes (2) but doesn't include (1). By contrast, choice [b](D)[/b] includes both (1) and (2), because both "[color=blue]slightly higher[/color]" and "[color=blue]slightly lower[/color]" are included in the idea of "[color=blue]similar[/color]". That's why the OA is a better answer. Mike [/quote] [color=red][b]luminosity falls off rapidly with distance from the center[/b][/color] Doesn't this means that luminosity decreases?? ### GMAT/MBA Expert GMAT Instructor Joined 28 Dec 2011 Posted: 768 messages Followed by: 138 members Upvotes: 387 ela4490 wrote: luminosity falls off rapidly with distance from the center Doesn't this means that luminosity decreases?? Dear ela4490, I'm happy to respond. The short answer is "yes," although this idiom means something more specific. To decrease simply means to go down, to decrease in value. The idiom "to fall off" or "to drop off" means to decrease rapidly. If the amount in my bank account simply decreases, I may have$500 the first week, then $400 the second week, then$300, etc. That's a nice moderate decrease.

If the amount in my bank account falls off, maybe I have $500 on Monday of the first week, but say by Wednesday of the first week it is down to$37. In other words, there was a huge decrease right at the beginning. That is an extreme example of "falling off."

To say "luminosity falls off rapidly with distance from the center" is to say that up close, there is high luminosity, then a short distance away it's much lower, then it continues to get even lower as we move farther away.

My friend, here is a set of GMAT Idiom Flashcards. It doesn't include this idiom, but at least the basic ones.

The best way to learn all these subtle idioms is to read. See this blog:
How to Improve Your GMAT Verbal Score

Does all this make sense?
Mike

_________________
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
https://gmat.magoosh.com/

• Free Practice Test & Review
How would you score if you took the GMAT

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Get 300+ Practice Questions

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5 Day FREE Trial
Study Smarter, Not Harder

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Magoosh
Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Trial & Practice Exam
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 1 Hour Free
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• FREE GMAT Exam
Know how you'd score today for $0 Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Award-winning private GMAT tutoring Register now and save up to$200

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Veritas GMAT Class
Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

### Top First Responders*

1 Jay@ManhattanReview 70 first replies
2 Brent@GMATPrepNow 67 first replies
3 GMATGuruNY 41 first replies
4 Ian Stewart 27 first replies
5 Scott@TargetTestPrep 16 first replies
* Only counts replies to topics started in last 30 days
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members

### Most Active Experts

1 Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

221 posts
2 Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

93 posts
3 Max@Math Revolution

Math Revolution

89 posts
4 Jay@ManhattanReview

Manhattan Review

73 posts
5 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

64 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts