-
abhasjha
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 7:17 am
- Location: NY
- Thanked: 28 times
- Followed by:11 members
In Democracies and its Critics, Robert Dahl
defends both democratic value and pluralist
democracies, or polyarchies (a rough shorthand
term for Western political systems). Dahl argues
(5) convincingly that the idea of democracy rests on
political equality—the equality capacity of all citizens
to determine or influence collective decisions. Of
course, as Dahl recognizes, if hierarchical ordering
is inevitable in any structure of government, and if
(10) no society can guarantee perfect equality in the
resources that may give rise to political influence,
the democratic principle of political equality is
incapable of full realization. So actual systems can
be deemed democratic only as approximations to
(15) the ideal. It is on these grounds that Dahl defends
polyarchy.
As a representative system in which elected
officials both determine government policy and are
accountable to a broad-based electorate, polyarchy
(20) reinforces a diffusion of power away from any
single center and toward a variety of individuals,
groups, and organizations. It is this centrifugal
characteristic, Dahl argues, that makes polyarchy
the nearest possible approximation to the democratic
(25) ideal. Polyarchy achieves this diffusion of power
through party competition and the operation of
pressure groups. Competing for votes, parties seek
to offer different sections of the electorate what
they most want; they do not ask what the majority
(30) thinks of an issue, but what policy commitments
will sway the electoral decisions of particular
groups. Equally, groups that have strong feelings
about an issue can organize in pressure groups to
influence public policy .
(35) During the 1960s and 1970s, criticism of the
theory of pluralist democracy was vigorous. Many
critics pointed to a gap between the model and the
reality of Western political systems. They argued
that the distribution of power resources other than
(40) the vote was so uneven that the political order
systematically gave added weight to those who were
already richer or organizationally more powerful.
So the power of some groups to exclude issues
altogether from the political agenda effectively
(45) countered any diffusion of influence on
decision-making.
Although such criticism became subdued during
the 1980s, Dahl himself seems to support some of
the earlier criticism. Although he regrets that some
(50) Western intellectuals demand more democracy
from polyarchies than is possible, and is cautious
about the possibility of further democratization, he
nevertheless ends his book by asking what changes
in structures and consciousness might make political
(55) life more democratic in present polyarchies. One
answer, he suggests, is to look at the economic
order of polyarchies from the point of view of the
citizen as well as from that of producers and
consumers. This would require a critical examination
(60) of both the distribution of those economic resources
that are at the same time political resources, and
the relationship between political structures and
economic enterprises.
8. The characterization of polyarchies as “centrifugal” (line 22) emphasizes the
(A) way in which political power is decentralized in a polyarchy
(B) central role of power resources in a polyarchy
(C) kind of concentrated power that political parties generate in a polyarchy
(D) dynamic balance that exists between economic enterprises and elected officials in a polyarchy
(E) dynamic balance that exists between voters and elected officials in a polyarchy
9. In the third paragraph, the author of the passage refers to criticism of the theory of polyarchy democracy primarily in order to
(A) refute Dahl’s statement that Western intellectuals expect more democracy from polyarchies than is possible
(B) advocate the need for rethinking the basic principles on which the theory of democracy rests
(C) suggest that the structure of government within pluralist democracies should be changed
(D) point out a flaw in Dahl’s argument that the principle of political equality cannot be fully realized
(E) point out an objection to Dahl’s defense of polyarchy
10. According to the passage, the aim of a political party in a polyarchy is to do which one of the following?
(A) determine what the position of the majority of voters is on a particular issue
(B) determine what position on an issue will earn the support of particular groups of voters
(C) organize voters into pressure groups in order to influence public policy on a particular issue
(D) ensure that elected officials accurately represent the position of the party on specific issue
(E) ensure that elected officials accurately represent the position of the electorate on specific issues
11. It can be inferred from the passage that Dahl assumes which one of the following in his defense of polyarchies?
(A) Polyarchies are limited in the extent to which they can embody the idea of democracy.
(B) The structure of polyarchical governments is free of hierarchical ordering.
(C) The citizens of a polyarchy have equal access to the resources that provide political influence.
(D) Polyarchy is the best political system to foster the growth of political parties.
(E) Polyarchy is a form of government that is not influenced by the interests of economic enterprises.
12. Which one of the following is most closely analogous to pluralist democracies as they are described in relation to the democratic principle of political equality?
(A) an exact copy of an ancient artifact that is on display in a museum
(B) a performance of a musical score whose range of tonality cannot be completely captured by any actual instruments
(C) a lecture by a former astronaut to a class of young students who would like to be astronauts
(D) the commemoration of a historical event each year by a historian presenting a lecture on a topic related to the event
(E) the mold from which a number of identical castings of a sculpture are made
13. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen Dahl’s defense of polyarchy?
(A) The political agenda in a polyarchy is strongly influenced by how power resources other than the vote are distributed.
(B) The outcome of elections is more often determined by the financial resources candidates are able to spend during campaigns than by their stands on political issue.
(C) Public policy in a polyarchy is primarily determined by decision-makers who are not accountable to elected officials.
(D) Political parties in a polyarchy help concentrate political power in the central government.
(E) Small and diverse pressure groups are able to exert as much influence on public policy in a polyarchy as are large and powerful groups.
14. The passage can best be described as
(A) an inquiry into how present-day polyarchies can be made more democratic
(B) a commentary on the means pressure groups employ to exert influence within polyarchies
(C) a description of the relationship between polyarchies and economic enterprises
(D) a discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of polyarchy as a form of democracy
(E) an overview of the similarities between political parties and pressure groups in a polyarchy
defends both democratic value and pluralist
democracies, or polyarchies (a rough shorthand
term for Western political systems). Dahl argues
(5) convincingly that the idea of democracy rests on
political equality—the equality capacity of all citizens
to determine or influence collective decisions. Of
course, as Dahl recognizes, if hierarchical ordering
is inevitable in any structure of government, and if
(10) no society can guarantee perfect equality in the
resources that may give rise to political influence,
the democratic principle of political equality is
incapable of full realization. So actual systems can
be deemed democratic only as approximations to
(15) the ideal. It is on these grounds that Dahl defends
polyarchy.
As a representative system in which elected
officials both determine government policy and are
accountable to a broad-based electorate, polyarchy
(20) reinforces a diffusion of power away from any
single center and toward a variety of individuals,
groups, and organizations. It is this centrifugal
characteristic, Dahl argues, that makes polyarchy
the nearest possible approximation to the democratic
(25) ideal. Polyarchy achieves this diffusion of power
through party competition and the operation of
pressure groups. Competing for votes, parties seek
to offer different sections of the electorate what
they most want; they do not ask what the majority
(30) thinks of an issue, but what policy commitments
will sway the electoral decisions of particular
groups. Equally, groups that have strong feelings
about an issue can organize in pressure groups to
influence public policy .
(35) During the 1960s and 1970s, criticism of the
theory of pluralist democracy was vigorous. Many
critics pointed to a gap between the model and the
reality of Western political systems. They argued
that the distribution of power resources other than
(40) the vote was so uneven that the political order
systematically gave added weight to those who were
already richer or organizationally more powerful.
So the power of some groups to exclude issues
altogether from the political agenda effectively
(45) countered any diffusion of influence on
decision-making.
Although such criticism became subdued during
the 1980s, Dahl himself seems to support some of
the earlier criticism. Although he regrets that some
(50) Western intellectuals demand more democracy
from polyarchies than is possible, and is cautious
about the possibility of further democratization, he
nevertheless ends his book by asking what changes
in structures and consciousness might make political
(55) life more democratic in present polyarchies. One
answer, he suggests, is to look at the economic
order of polyarchies from the point of view of the
citizen as well as from that of producers and
consumers. This would require a critical examination
(60) of both the distribution of those economic resources
that are at the same time political resources, and
the relationship between political structures and
economic enterprises.
8. The characterization of polyarchies as “centrifugal” (line 22) emphasizes the
(A) way in which political power is decentralized in a polyarchy
(B) central role of power resources in a polyarchy
(C) kind of concentrated power that political parties generate in a polyarchy
(D) dynamic balance that exists between economic enterprises and elected officials in a polyarchy
(E) dynamic balance that exists between voters and elected officials in a polyarchy
9. In the third paragraph, the author of the passage refers to criticism of the theory of polyarchy democracy primarily in order to
(A) refute Dahl’s statement that Western intellectuals expect more democracy from polyarchies than is possible
(B) advocate the need for rethinking the basic principles on which the theory of democracy rests
(C) suggest that the structure of government within pluralist democracies should be changed
(D) point out a flaw in Dahl’s argument that the principle of political equality cannot be fully realized
(E) point out an objection to Dahl’s defense of polyarchy
10. According to the passage, the aim of a political party in a polyarchy is to do which one of the following?
(A) determine what the position of the majority of voters is on a particular issue
(B) determine what position on an issue will earn the support of particular groups of voters
(C) organize voters into pressure groups in order to influence public policy on a particular issue
(D) ensure that elected officials accurately represent the position of the party on specific issue
(E) ensure that elected officials accurately represent the position of the electorate on specific issues
11. It can be inferred from the passage that Dahl assumes which one of the following in his defense of polyarchies?
(A) Polyarchies are limited in the extent to which they can embody the idea of democracy.
(B) The structure of polyarchical governments is free of hierarchical ordering.
(C) The citizens of a polyarchy have equal access to the resources that provide political influence.
(D) Polyarchy is the best political system to foster the growth of political parties.
(E) Polyarchy is a form of government that is not influenced by the interests of economic enterprises.
12. Which one of the following is most closely analogous to pluralist democracies as they are described in relation to the democratic principle of political equality?
(A) an exact copy of an ancient artifact that is on display in a museum
(B) a performance of a musical score whose range of tonality cannot be completely captured by any actual instruments
(C) a lecture by a former astronaut to a class of young students who would like to be astronauts
(D) the commemoration of a historical event each year by a historian presenting a lecture on a topic related to the event
(E) the mold from which a number of identical castings of a sculpture are made
13. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen Dahl’s defense of polyarchy?
(A) The political agenda in a polyarchy is strongly influenced by how power resources other than the vote are distributed.
(B) The outcome of elections is more often determined by the financial resources candidates are able to spend during campaigns than by their stands on political issue.
(C) Public policy in a polyarchy is primarily determined by decision-makers who are not accountable to elected officials.
(D) Political parties in a polyarchy help concentrate political power in the central government.
(E) Small and diverse pressure groups are able to exert as much influence on public policy in a polyarchy as are large and powerful groups.
14. The passage can best be described as
(A) an inquiry into how present-day polyarchies can be made more democratic
(B) a commentary on the means pressure groups employ to exert influence within polyarchies
(C) a description of the relationship between polyarchies and economic enterprises
(D) a discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of polyarchy as a form of democracy
(E) an overview of the similarities between political parties and pressure groups in a polyarchy
