Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Raul & Stefano

Expert replies
by bvn » Sun Dec 05, 2010 11:24 pm
Raul: The disturbing reality is that 85 percent of individuals now report that they know at least one individual who has spent at least one year in prison.

Stefano: But suppose that any given person knows about 40 other people. If about 5 percent of the population, or about one out of every 20 individuals, has spent at least one year in prison, then any given person probably knows multiple people who have been imprisoned for at least one year.

Stefano's argument relies on the assumption that ____.


(A) for the population in question, reasonable rates of imprisonment with one-year sentences are not generally exceeded

(B) individuals who have never been imprisoned for one year or longer do not associate only with other individuals who have never been imprisoned for one year or longer

(C) at least 85 percent of the population in question is always comprised of people who know at least one person who has been imprisoned for at least one year

(D) Raul is not intentionally manipulating the numbers he uses to support his assertion

(E) first-hand knowledge of the prison system motivates individuals to stay out of prison more than do statistics about the percentage of the population that has been imprisoned for at least one year
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Geva@EconomistGMAT » Sun Dec 05, 2010 11:39 pm
Answer should be B. Stefano's argument assumes an even distribution of the 5% of the population that is imprisoned. If indeed 1 of every 20 random people (i.e., choose 20 people at random, from anywhere in the country, and 1 one of them has been imprisoned) has been imprisoned for at least a year, then everybody would know someone. However, this even geographical/socio-economic distribution is not necessarily true - suppose the 5% imrpisoned are all living in one city? an extreme example, but I just use it to show how Stefanos' argument can be broken.

B plays to this assumption - if B is wrong, and people who have not been imprisoned for over a year DO associate only with other people like them, then it is possible to choose someone who knows 40 people, but all of them have never been imprisoned for a year, much like himself. Thus, in order for Stefano's argument to hold, he must assume that the "innocents" (and the argument here uses inncoents in the broad sense of "not in the population of prison sentence>1 year") do not keep to themselves.
Geva
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT
1-888-780-GMAT
https://www.mastergmat.com
Join the discussion