Ramon and Jason laid bricks for the six walls of a new building together, each of them working alone at a constant rate. Ramon spent twelve fewer hours laying bricks than did Jason, but Ramon laid bricks at a rate fifty percent faster than did Jason. If each wall required 204 bricks, and the total time it took the two men to complete the job was 84 hours, how many bricks per hour did Ramon lay?
A. 24
B. 22
C. 18
D. 14
E. 12
Is there a strategic approach to this question?
OA C
Ramon and Jason laid bricks
This topic has expert replies
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7187
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 4:43 pm
- Followed by:23 members
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
Total number of bricks = (number of walls) (bricks per wall) = (6)(204) = 1224.lheiannie07 wrote:Ramon and Jason laid bricks for the six walls of a new building together, each of them working alone at a constant rate. Ramon spent twelve fewer hours laying bricks than did Jason, but Ramon laid bricks at a rate fifty percent faster than did Jason. If each wall required 204 bricks, and the total time it took the two men to complete the job was 84 hours, how many bricks per hour did Ramon lay?
A. 24
B. 22
C. 18
D. 14
E. 12
Let J = Jason's time.
Since Ramon works for 12 fewer hours, Ramon's time = J-12.
Since the total time is 84 hours, we get:
J + (J-12) = 84
2J = 96
J = 48.
Thus:
Jason's time = 48 hours.
Ramon's time = 48-12 = 36 hours.
Since Ramon's rate is 50% faster than Jason's rate, Ramon's rate is 150% = 3/2 of Jason's rate.
Since Ramon's rate is 3/2 of Jason's rate, Jason's rate is 2/3 of Ramon's rate.
Let R = Ramon's rate, implying that Jason's rate = (2/3)R.
Since Ramon works for 36 hours, Ramon's output = rt = R*36 = 36R.
Since Jason works for 48 hours, Jason's output = rt = (2/3)(R) * 48 = 32R.
Since the total output is 1224 bricks, we get:
36R + 32R = 1224
68R = 1224
R = 18 bricks per hour.
The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
GMAT/MBA Expert
- [email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi lheiannie07,
We're told that Ramon and Jason laid bricks for the 6 walls of a new building together, each of them working alone at a constant rate. Ramon spent 12 FEWER hours laying bricks than did Jason, but Ramon laid bricks at a rate 50% FASTER than did Jason. Each wall required 204 bricks, and the total time it took the two men to complete the job was 84 hours. We're asked for the number of bricks per hour that Ramon laid.
While this is a typical 'table' question - with a lot of information to organize - you can use the patterns involved (and the Answer Choices) to avoid some of the long-winded calculations and still get the correct answer.
To start, Ramon's rate was 50% FASTER than Jason's rate. In these types of questions, it's highly likely that both rates will be INTEGERS, so the correct answer will almost certainly be an integer that is 50% greater than another integer. Only 3 of the 5 answers fit that pattern (24 is 50% greater than 16, 18 is 50% greater than 12 and 12 is 50% greater than 8).
Next, there are 6 walls that require 204 bricks each... that's a total of (6)(204) = 1224 bricks. With 84 hours of total work, we can use some estimation to determine what the AVERAGE brick-laying rate would need to be....
1224/84 = approximately 1200/80 = 15 bricks/hour would need to be laid on average. Now, consider the three 'pairs' of rates from before:
24/hour and 16/hour
18/hour and 12/hour
12/hour and 8/hour
Which pair could have an average of about 15 bricks/hour? Only one option could account for that average - the one that puts Ramon's rate at 18. That also happens to be the correct answer.
Final Answer: C
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
We're told that Ramon and Jason laid bricks for the 6 walls of a new building together, each of them working alone at a constant rate. Ramon spent 12 FEWER hours laying bricks than did Jason, but Ramon laid bricks at a rate 50% FASTER than did Jason. Each wall required 204 bricks, and the total time it took the two men to complete the job was 84 hours. We're asked for the number of bricks per hour that Ramon laid.
While this is a typical 'table' question - with a lot of information to organize - you can use the patterns involved (and the Answer Choices) to avoid some of the long-winded calculations and still get the correct answer.
To start, Ramon's rate was 50% FASTER than Jason's rate. In these types of questions, it's highly likely that both rates will be INTEGERS, so the correct answer will almost certainly be an integer that is 50% greater than another integer. Only 3 of the 5 answers fit that pattern (24 is 50% greater than 16, 18 is 50% greater than 12 and 12 is 50% greater than 8).
Next, there are 6 walls that require 204 bricks each... that's a total of (6)(204) = 1224 bricks. With 84 hours of total work, we can use some estimation to determine what the AVERAGE brick-laying rate would need to be....
1224/84 = approximately 1200/80 = 15 bricks/hour would need to be laid on average. Now, consider the three 'pairs' of rates from before:
24/hour and 16/hour
18/hour and 12/hour
12/hour and 8/hour
Which pair could have an average of about 15 bricks/hour? Only one option could account for that average - the one that puts Ramon's rate at 18. That also happens to be the correct answer.
Final Answer: C
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Scott@TargetTestPrep
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 7243
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2015 10:56 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Thanked: 43 times
- Followed by:29 members
We are given that Ramon's rate is 50% faster than Jason's rate. If we let Jason's rate = r, then Ramon's rate = 1.5r. We are also given that the total time to complete the job was 84 hours, but Ramon worked 12 fewer hours than Jason did. If we let Jason's time = t, then Ramon's time = t - 12. Let's now determine t:BTGmoderatorDC wrote:Ramon and Jason laid bricks for the six walls of a new building together, each of them working alone at a constant rate. Ramon spent twelve fewer hours laying bricks than did Jason, but Ramon laid bricks at a rate fifty percent faster than did Jason. If each wall required 204 bricks, and the total time it took the two men to complete the job was 84 hours, how many bricks per hour did Ramon lay?
A. 24
B. 22
C. 18
D. 14
E. 12
Is there a strategic approach to this question?
OA C
t + t - 12 = 84
2t = 96
t = 48
So, Jason's time was 48 hours and Ramon's time was 36 hours.
Ramon's work = 1.5r(36) = 54r
Jason's work = 48r
Since total work = Ramon's work + Jason's work, and total work = 6 x 204 = 1224 bricks, we have:
1224 = 54r + 48r
1224 = 102r
12 = r
Thus, Ramon laid 1.5 x 12 = 18 bricks per hour.
Answer: C
Scott Woodbury-Stewart
Founder and CEO
[email protected]
See why Target Test Prep is rated 5 out of 5 stars on BEAT the GMAT. Read our reviews