BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Quicker way to tackle these?

Expert replies
by xcise_science » Sat Nov 24, 2007 11:37 am
I got these right, but is there an easier/faster way to get to the answers?

For Q13, I did a quick run through of multiples of 2 & 3 that will give me 288.

Image

For Q11, I just plugged in the answer, whats a quicker way?

Image

Thanks!
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by beeparoo » Sat Nov 24, 2007 2:12 pm
For Q13 (first one):

Use a simple factor-tree approach:
288 splits into 2 x 144 (a prime and perfect square of 12)

Upon realizing the above, I know the prime factors are now:
2 * (2 * 2 * 3) * (2 * 2 * 3) = (2^5)*(3^2)

Therefore x = 5, y = 2

Plugging these values into (2^(x-1))*(3^(y-2)) is
2^4 * 3^0 = 16

++

For Q11 (second question):

F/J = 3x/2x

Adding $40 for the month of FEB now changes the ratio in the following way:
F'/J = (3x+40)/2x, which the question claims is equivalent to 5/3

Equate, simplify and re-express in terms of x.
(x = 120)

Noting from the question that you are looking for January's costs, you know that JAN = 2x = 2*120 = 420

Cheers
Join the discussion

by cris » Sat Nov 24, 2007 8:01 pm
I think there is an easiest way.


q11.the difference between 5/3 and 3/2 is 1/6

then multiply 40 x 6= 240
Join the discussion

by xcise_science » Sun Nov 25, 2007 1:27 pm
Thanks. Why did you multiply by 6?
Join the discussion

by me4mba » Sun Nov 25, 2007 4:40 pm
I think the key to answering Q13 is to know that:

x^(a-b) = x^a / x^b

So 2^(x-1) = 2^x / 2 and 3^(y-2) = 3^y / 9

Put the two components together, and you'll see the question is asking for:
(2^x)(3^y) / 18 it's already given that (2^x)(3^y) = 288

so really, the question is asking 288/18. The answer is 16.
Join the discussion

by me4mba » Sun Nov 25, 2007 4:49 pm
For Q11, you'll have to set up 2 equations based on the given ratios.

I) F/J = 3/2

II) (F+40) / J = 5/3

We have 2 equations and 2 variables, so we can solve for the variables. Since we're looking for J, I would substitute F = 3J/2 (derived from equation I) to equation II. So you'll have

3J/2 + 40 = 5J/3

Sove for J, J = 240
Join the discussion

by xcise_science » Sun Nov 25, 2007 6:27 pm
great, Thanks!!
Join the discussion