BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Question ID 1273

Expert replies
by RaginT » Wed Jun 02, 2010 1:35 am
Hi there,

I have looked at GMATfix for the worked solution to this problem. I am still having difficulty with the following step :

Is - y > y ?

rephrased this means, is y > 0

Can anybody show me why this is the case?
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by gmatmachoman » Wed Jun 02, 2010 1:41 am
RaginT wrote:Hi there,

I have looked at GMATfix for the worked solution to this problem. I am still having difficulty with the following step :

Is - y > y ?

rephrased this means, is y > 0

Can anybody show me why this is the case?
- y > y

= -y -y>0

-2y >0

-y>0

multiply (-1) both sides

y <0

So the rephrase will be is y<0

OR

0 >y

which also means is Y<0 ??
Join the discussion

by jube » Wed Jun 02, 2010 2:09 am
If y is positive i.e. y>0, then false
If y < 0, then true

for e.g. y=2, then -y = -2
-2>2 -- false

y=-2, then -y= - (-2)
2>-2 -- true

hope this helps!
Join the discussion

by selango » Wed Jun 02, 2010 2:15 am
Ragin T,

Rephrasing make the equation easy to solve in DS questions.

Rephrasing is nothing but solving the variables on both side of operators,so that it can deduce into easy terms which make the testing scenario easy.

Often it involves cancelling the common variables on both sides or adding/subtracting the variables.

Once u solve more DS ques u ll b able to understand this technique
Join the discussion

by RaginT » Wed Jun 02, 2010 2:26 am
I don't think either of you have got this : the rephrase is definitely correct : is y > 0?

the full problem and solution is here : https://www.gmatfix.com/solution/1273

my thinking is this :

is - y > y ?

becomes 0 > y - (-y) (take the -y from the other side)
therefore 0 > -2y
therefore is 0 < y ? (flip the sign when the -2 goes over to the other side)

However my other approach gives the opposite answer! :

is - y > y ?

becomes - y -y > 0
or -2y > 0
therefore is y < 0 ? (flip the sign as the -2 is taken over to the other side)

Help!
Join the discussion

by selango » Wed Jun 02, 2010 2:29 am
RaginT wrote:I don't think either of you have got this : the rephrase is definitely correct : is y > 0?

the full problem and solution is here : https://www.gmatfix.com/solution/1273

my thinking is this :

is - y > y ?

becomes 0 > y - (-y) (take the -y from the other side)
therefore 0 > -2y
-->Here its wrong..it should be 0>2y and y<0



therefore is 0 < y ? (flip the sign when the -2 goes over to the other side)

However my other approach gives the opposite answer! :

is - y > y ?

becomes - y -y > 0
or -2y > 0
therefore is y < 0 ? (flip the sign as the -2 is taken over to the other side)

Help!
Join the discussion

by selango » Wed Jun 02, 2010 2:31 am
is - y > y ?

becomes 0 > y - (-y) (take the -y from the other side)

therefore 0 > 2y(not 0>-2y)

-->y<0

Hope this clarify
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Wed Jun 02, 2010 2:33 am
selango wrote:
RaginT wrote:I don't think either of you have got this : the rephrase is definitely correct : is y > 0?

the full problem and solution is here : https://www.gmatfix.com/solution/1273

my thinking is this :

is - y > y ?

becomes 0 > y - (-y) (take the -y from the other side)
therefore 0 > -2y
-->Here its wrong..it should be 0>2y and y<0



therefore is 0 < y ? (flip the sign when the -2 goes over to the other side)

However my other approach gives the opposite answer! :

is - y > y ?

becomes - y -y > 0
or -2y > 0
therefore is y < 0 ? (flip the sign as the -2 is taken over to the other side)

Help!
@Ragin T

CHeck my previous post.that shuld help u!
Join the discussion

by selango » Wed Jun 02, 2010 2:37 am
I checked the solution in GMAT fix.

1) -y>y should be rephrased to y<0

2) -y<y should be rephrased to y>0

But in the solution its got swapped.
Join the discussion

by Patrick_GMATFix » Wed Jun 02, 2010 8:01 am
RaginT wrote:Hi there,

I have looked at GMATfix for the worked solution to this problem. I am still having difficulty with the following step :

Is - y > y ?

rephrased this means, is y > 0

Can anybody show me why this is the case?
is -y>y should be rephrased to y < 0?

just add y to both sides to get is 0 > 2y, then divide both sides by 2 to get is 0 > y?

Thank you for reporting this mistake. If you see anything similar in the future, please hit "Report Error" next to the solution. Sorry about the confusion

What do you think of the Solutions Engine so far?
-Patrick
  • Ask me about tutoring.
Join the discussion

by Patrick_GMATFix » Wed Jun 02, 2010 8:14 am
selango wrote:I checked the solution in GMAT fix.

1) -y>y should be rephrased to y<0

2) -y<y should be rephrased to y>0

But in the solution its got swapped.
Thank you selango. Problem has been fixed.
  • Ask me about tutoring.
Join the discussion