BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

question from OG 10th

Expert replies
by magical cook » Sat Feb 03, 2007 9:33 pm
Can anyone help me understand this probelm?

The answer is C, however, we are only given the information that the share was increased by $4.5, which means we only know the increase and not actual price of the share, so we would not know the actual price of the share on 60's. :?

Can anyone help me??

Thanks!!
R.
Attachments
PS2.doc
(34 KiB) Downloaded 211 times
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by maxim730 » Sun Feb 04, 2007 5:55 am
1) Closing price doubled. Doesn't say anything about price. INSUFF

2) Closing price increased by $4.50. Doesn't say by how much. INSUFF

1+2) Price doubled to 4.50. We can then say that price in 75 was 2.25

The problem states that price doubled from 60 to 75. So, if price was 2.25 in '75 then price must be 1.125 in '60

I think so at least.. :)
Join the discussion

by magical cook » Sun Feb 04, 2007 6:34 am
Thank you max for your reply.

IF the sentence says price increased "TO" $4.5 instead of increased "by" $4.5, the closing price of 84 is detrmined at $4.5. but if it says increased "by" $4.5, I thought that means it only tells you the increase from 75 to 84 is $4.5 and not actualy closing price.

Dose it make any difference betwen increase to and increase by? (I think it dose, that's why I am stuck...)

thanks!
R.
Join the discussion

by gabriel » Mon Feb 05, 2007 4:33 am
magical cook wrote:Thank you max for your reply.

IF the sentence says price increased "TO" $4.5 instead of increased "by" $4.5, the closing price of 84 is detrmined at $4.5. but if it says increased "by" $4.5, I thought that means it only tells you the increase from 75 to 84 is $4.5 and not actualy closing price.

Dose it make any difference betwen increase to and increase by? (I think it dose, that's why I am stuck...)

thanks!
R.

well there is a difference..... the price increased to 4.5 means that the price may 1 1984 is 4.5 $.... when it says increased by 4.5 $ it means that u add 4.5 $ to the price of may 1 1975.... in either case the answer wuld be C.... the first case has already been explained....

for the second case..... the first statement says that the price is doubled .... the second satement says that the price increased by 4.5 $.... that means that the price on may 1st 1975 was 4.5$ and on may 1st 1984 was .... 4.5 +4.5=9 $..... hope this helps....
Join the discussion

by magical cook » Tue Feb 06, 2007 9:10 am
gabriel, thanks for your reply:) I think I finally got it..
Join the discussion