BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Question about comparisons

Expert replies
by Balrog1978 » Tue Dec 28, 2010 12:03 pm
Senior executives had a larger percentage increase in pay in 1990 than the wages of other salaried workers.
(A) Senior executives had a larger percentage increase in pay in 1990 than
(B) The percentage of senior executives' pay increase in 1990 was larger than for
(C) The 1990 increase in pay for senior executives was larger in terms of percentage than
(D) In 1990 senior executives had a larger pay increase in terms of percentage than did
(E) The pay of senior executives increased in 1990 by a larger percentage than did
OA : E

In the question above - I've tried applying the strategy of breaking down modifier questions by :
1) Identify the comparison indicator : "than"
2) Identify the items that are being compared
3) Check whether the items in (2) above are structurally and logically parallel!

My question was around how to identify WHAT are these items are (ie, the approach to identify and list these items so as to attack the question armed with the CORRECT information). In this question, If I were to list the items, would the strategy employed to list items be:
Larger Percentage Increase in Pay vs Wages?
Increase in Pay vs Wages?
Pay vs Wages?
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Geva@EconomistGMAT » Wed Dec 29, 2010 12:52 am
As a general rule, go by the second item, which should whatever follows "than". Once you've established what the second item is, go back and hunt for the right first item.

In your sentence above, It helps to focus on the part outside of the underlined part: whatever we compare must eventually be compared to "wages", so we're looking for an answer choice where the first item is something akin to wages: not increase in wages (answer choices A, C, D) nor the percentage of increase (Answer choice B), but the actual pay itself, which is a synonym to wages (answer choice E).

Does this answer your query?
Geva
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT
1-888-780-GMAT
https://www.mastergmat.com
Join the discussion

by EducationAisle » Wed Dec 29, 2010 3:46 am
As in all these kind of questions involving comparisons/ellipsis, where few words are omitted, always try to frame the ideal sentence:

Ideal sentence:

In 1990, the pay of senior executives increased by a larger percentage than the wages of other salaried workers increased.

Essentially, following two events that occurred in 1990 are being compared:

1. The pay of senior executives increased

2. The wages of other salaried workers increased

Comparison: #1 above was more than #2.

A has a big issue. At worst, it can be interpreted as: Senior executives had a larger percentage increase in pay in 1990 than (in) the wages of other salaried workers.

B is illogical, since it reads: ..pay increase was larger for the wages of other salaried workers..

C would read: The 1990 increase in pay for senior executives was larger in terms of percentage than (in terms of) the wages of other salaried workers.

D would read: In 1990 senior executives had a larger pay increase in terms of percentage than the wages of other salaried (had a pay increase) - Seems to suggest that wages had a pay increase!!
Ashish
MBA - ISB, GMAT - 99th Percentile
GMAT Faculty @ EducationAisle
www.EducationAisle.com

Sentence Correction Nirvana available at:

a) Amazon: Sentence Correction Nirvana

b) Flipkart: Sentence Correction Nirvana

Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi
Join the discussion

by Balrog1978 » Wed Dec 29, 2010 7:29 am
Thanks - this plugs the hole !! :)
Join the discussion

by Balrog1978 » Thu Dec 30, 2010 11:17 am
Hmm - This was a good strategy - but I think I messed up again. tried using it to solve this SC

42. According to a survey of graduating medical students conducted by the Association of American Medical Colleges, minority graduates are nearly four times more likely than are other graduates in planning to practice in socioeconomically deprived areas.
(A) minority graduates are nearly four times more likely than are other graduates in planning to practice
(B) minority graduates are nearly four times more likely than other graduates who plan on practicing
(C) minority graduates are nearly four times as likely as other graduates to plan on practicing
(D) it is nearly four times more likely that minority graduates rather than other graduates will plan to practice
(E) it is nearly four times as likely for minority graduates than other graduates to plan to practice

OA : C

I used the strategy:
1) Find the Comparison signal : Than
2) Identify the items being compared : minority graduates are vs are other graduates
3) Eliminated C since : minority graduates are did not seem parallel to other graduates

Looks like I haven't grasped it completely! Any pointers?
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1