BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Quadrant question - gmat prep

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by DanaJ » Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:17 am
The initial info that (-a, b) and (-b, a) are in the same quadrant tells us that the pairs of numbers {-a, -b} and {b, a} share the sign: if a is positive, then so is b; if a is negative, then so is b. This makes for two cases:
a. when a and b are both positive
b. when a and b are both negative.
We can't tell if it's one case or the other, but that is not relevant.

Now, let's look at the stmts:
1. tells us that x and y share the sign, which is a good start, but since we cannot establish if x and y share the sign of a and b, we can't establish if (-x, y) is in the same quadrant as the above points.

2. gives us the extra info that we need to complete 1: it's basically telling us that a and x (and by using 1) and consequently all the numbers share the same sign.
This is why [spoiler]C[/spoiler] is the answer here: only after putting both stmts together we are able to conclude that the numbers share the sign, no matter what sign it is.

I've also attached smth about quadrants, it may come in handy.
Attachments
Untitled.jpg
Join the discussion

by Baldini » Thu Mar 12, 2009 6:16 am
Thanks yet again DanaJ - your explanation was very helpful, clear and I was able to understand where I made the mistake!
GMAX
Join the discussion

by Vemuri » Thu Mar 12, 2009 9:34 am
DanaJ wrote:
I've also attached smth about quadrants, it may come in handy.
You might want to correct the 2nd quadrant details. X is negative & Y is positive in the 2nd quadrant.
Join the discussion

by DanaJ » Fri Mar 13, 2009 8:00 am
Oops... yes, you are right. I missed that.
Attachments
untitled_138.jpg
Join the discussion

by logitech » Fri Mar 13, 2009 2:27 pm
I have just thanked "DanaJ" for the following post, "Quadrant question - gmat prep" . B-)
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by DanaJ » Fri Mar 13, 2009 2:32 pm
I have just thanked "logitech" for the following post, "Quadrant question - gmat prep"
... for being so supportive! :D

You get my first "thanks". Cheers.
Join the discussion

by gabriel » Fri Mar 13, 2009 2:39 pm
I have just thanked both of you ... No Reason :P

Oh look a admin spamming :shock:
Join the discussion