BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Qiller Quants - luck of the draw?

Find out how Beat The GMAT members tackled GMAT test prep with positive results. Get tips on GMAT test prep materials, online courses, study tips, and more.
Expert replies
by Fly_2008 » Tue Sep 16, 2008 5:25 am
Just scored a lower-than-expected 680 on my first attempt - V45-ish, Q39 - this marks my lowest-ever quant score due to many unfamiliar questions.

I studied OG and Kaplan for about two months, then the week leading up to the actual exam I had picked my quants up considerably using Kaplan Quiz Bank practice sets - went from averaging 65% to 81% on sets of 37 questions. Great explanations and the questions didn't seem too easy. I had scored 700, 710 and 720 (reinstalled) on OG Practice CATs from the site.

However, on exam day I drew a disproportianate number of questions in all my weakest areas - coordinate geometry, properties of sets, integers. These only came up occasionally on the practice tests (both Official and Kaplan) but seemed to make up about 30% of the actual test! This surprise, combined with a good bit of panic, sealed my fate.

Any chance I just drew a quirky set? Are quants getting harder this year?

In any case, I scheduled a second try for early November. I'll be working on my apps at the same time, so GMAT study will be focused on tuck-pointing the holes in my quant skills and maintining good pace.

While 680 is not a bad score overall, I know the 39Q will kill me at top schools, especially now that half of Lehman just joined the application pool! My goal is to get up to at least the 75th percentile.

If anyone knows of a quant review that explains well and covers all the relevant areas, or would like to share advice or past experiences, I'd be most appreciative.

Cheers and good luck to everyone!
Join the discussion
Source: — I just Beat The GMAT! |

by emrahercan » Tue Sep 16, 2008 6:44 am
I like your plan. Give it another shot in November someone with such a high Verbal score can score higher. But on the other hand, if this score is enough for you..don't bother taking the test again.

You can master your quant skills reading this forum and gmatclub's math section:

https://gmatclub.com/forum/7?sid=6a2265b ... 8125f8ebab

Good luck!
GMAT DELIGHT
Join the discussion

by Fly_2008 » Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:11 am
Thanks for the tip emrahercan, I wish I checked out the math section of this site earlier, lots of good stuff (BTW - not sure whether it's my browser, but I'm having trouble opening the link you posted).

Any opinion on MGMAT for quants? I relied heavily on Kaplan for my first attempt, but I'm starting to suspect they get their reputation for rigorousness from the Verbal side of things (e.g. a friend who scored upwards of 780 swears by Kaplan, but then again he's a native Russian speaker and had a strong quant background to begin with).

Thanks again and good luck with that 780!
Join the discussion

by newera » Wed Sep 17, 2008 4:03 am
hey,

I am in the same boat! I also felt like there was way too much focus on coordinate geometry, inequalities (which I HATE), and overlapping sets. I didn't get any questions on probability OR combinations. I too thought that the test was very biased in that regard.

I'm wondering if other people had the same experience. I just took the test today and got a miserable 660 (i'm shooting for 700). And it was mainly because my quant score plummetted. Part of me thinks that I just had bad luck with the questions and wants to re-take the test next week...

Anyway, your approach of taking the test again in November is probably better.

Good luck!
Join the discussion

by Fly_2008 » Wed Sep 17, 2008 4:43 am
I feel your pain, Newera. I spent at least a whole day of review on prob, stats and permutations, but not a single one showed up on the real test.

I would have gladly re-taken on the spot if they'd have let me; it just felt like a fluke question set. I would've stayed on that computer like it was a nickel slot machine.

But, if a lot of others are seeing the same thing, maybe there's been a rebalancing in the GMAT index. Better to learn the more obscure topics cold before before pulling the lever again.
Join the discussion