BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

PS prep

Expert replies
by bww » Wed May 16, 2007 6:37 am
Have been doing speed drills all morning...now having a major brain freeze. Can anyone point me in the right direction on these? thx!

14. Mr. Kramer, the losing candidate in a two-candidate election, received 942,568 votes, which was exactly 40 percent of all the votes cast. Approximately what percent of the remaining votes would he need to have received in order to have won at least 50 percent of all the votes cast?
(A) 10%
(B) 12%
(C) 15%
(D) 17%
(E) 20%

I need an equation of sorts here to limit the amount of hairy long division that I would otherwise have to do...


15. Which of the following inequalities is equivalent to –2 < x < 4 ?
(A) | x – 2 | < 4
(B) | x – 1 | < 3
(C) | x + 1 | < 3
(D) | x + 2 | < 4
(E) None of the above

16. If the average (arithmetic mean) of 5 positive temperatures is x degrees Fahrenheit, then the sum of the 3 greatest of these temperatures, in degrees Fahrenheit, could be
(A) 6x
(B) 4x
(C) (5x)/3
(D) (3x)/2
(E) (3x)/5
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by RAGS » Wed May 16, 2007 7:33 am
1. he recieved 942568 votes=x
total votes x/0.4
60 % votes is 3x/2 this is the denominator
the numerator term will be

50% votes is 5x/4
he should recieve 5x/4-x votes ie x/4 votes additional
the percent ans is x/4 divided by 3x/2
ans is 16.67 ie 17%

2. this is a plug in type of problem
a. let x=5 so a is true but violates the problem Q
b. seems correct
c.d at x=-2 c is true but violates the Q

another way of solving is by removing the mod and solving ie for B we have x-1<3 ie x<4 and -x+1<3 ie x>-2

16. i am not sure of this one
If It Is To Be It Is Up To Me
Join the discussion

by Cybermusings » Wed May 16, 2007 8:53 am
14. Mr. Kramer, the losing candidate in a two-candidate election, received 942,568 votes, which was exactly 40 percent of all the votes cast. Approximately what percent of the remaining votes would he need to have received in order to have won at least 50 percent of all the votes cast?
(A) 10%
(B) 12%
(C) 15%
(D) 17%
(E) 20%

He needs 10% of total votes to make it an even 50%
remainder votes = 60%
....Now simply find 10% of 60% = 10/100 * 100/60 * 100 = 16.67% = Approx 17%

I hope I am correct :)
Join the discussion

by bww » Wed May 16, 2007 8:56 am
OA is D, or about 17% for #14.
Join the discussion

by Cybermusings » Wed May 16, 2007 8:58 am
16. If the average (arithmetic mean) of 5 positive temperatures is x degrees Fahrenheit, then the sum of the 3 greatest of these temperatures, in degrees Fahrenheit, could be
(A) 6x
(B) 4x
(C) (5x)/3
(D) (3x)/2
(E) (3x)/5

Assuming that all temperatures are the same then each value would be x/5....Hence sum of the 3 largest = x/5 * 3 = 3x/5....but since this question says 3 greatest I am still wondering? :shock:
Join the discussion

by Cybermusings » Wed May 16, 2007 9:02 am
15. Which of the following inequalities is equivalent to –2 < x < 4 ?
(A) | x – 2 | < 4
(B) | x – 1 | < 3
(C) | x + 1 | < 3
(D) | x + 2 | < 4

Work with substitution

Start with C --- Ix+1I < 3
Now x can be 1,0,-1,-2,-3
Doesn't satisfy

D -- Ix+2I < 4
x can be 0,1,-1,-2,-3,-4,-5
Doesn't satisfy

B-- Ix-1I < 3
x can be 3,2,1,0,-1,

It does satisfy...hence B
Join the discussion

by bww » Wed May 16, 2007 9:07 am
The OA for #16 is B.

(obviously) not sure how to approach this one...i randomly assigned 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 as the five positive temperatures. average is 30, sum of largest 3 is 120. B suffices.

but then if you put in, say 20, 25, 30, 35 and 50...none of the choices suffice. clearly this isn't the way to solve it.
Join the discussion

Re: PS prep

by jayhawk2001 » Wed May 16, 2007 12:13 pm
bww wrote:Have been doing speed drills all morning...now having a major brain freeze. Can anyone point me in the right direction on these? thx!

14. Mr. Kramer, the losing candidate in a two-candidate election, received 942,568 votes, which was exactly 40 percent of all the votes cast. Approximately what percent of the remaining votes would he need to have received in order to have won at least 50 percent of all the votes cast?
(A) 10%
(B) 12%
(C) 15%
(D) 17%
(E) 20%

I need an equation of sorts here to limit the amount of hairy long division that I would otherwise have to do...
Just to simplify things, take x = 942568

Total votes = x/0.4

0.5 of total votes = 0.5x/0.4

Difference in votes needed = 0.5x/0.4 - x = 0.25x

Remaining votes = 0.6*x/0.4

Percentage = 0.25x / (0.6x/0.4) * 100 = 1/6*100 = 16.67%

bww wrote: 15. Which of the following inequalities is equivalent to –2 < x < 4 ?
(A) | x – 2 | < 4
(B) | x – 1 | < 3
(C) | x + 1 | < 3
(D) | x + 2 | < 4
(E) None of the above
To narrow down on the options, take the positive value inside the
absolute value

A - x-2 < 4 implies x < 6. Does not satisfy x<4. Discard

B - x-1 < 3 implies x < 4. Keep this

C - x+1 < 3 implies x < 2. Discard

D - x+2 < 4 implies x < 2. Discard

So, we are down to B and E.

For B, take the negative factor as well

-(x-1) < 3
-x + 1 < 3
-x < 2
x > -2

So, together B yields -2 < x < 4. Sufficient.

bww wrote:
16. If the average (arithmetic mean) of 5 positive temperatures is x degrees Fahrenheit, then the sum of the 3 greatest of these temperatures, in degrees Fahrenheit, could be
(A) 6x
(B) 4x
(C) (5x)/3
(D) (3x)/2
(E) (3x)/5
If we assume all 5 temp to be equal, the highest 3 will yield a sum 3x.

If we assume 2 of the least temp to be 1 and 1, the sum of the rest
will be 5x-2

So, sum has to be > 3x and less than 5x-2

Only B fits the bill.
Join the discussion

Re: PS prep

by gabriel » Fri May 18, 2007 9:54 am
bww wrote:
... 16. If the average (arithmetic mean) of 5 positive temperatures is x degrees Fahrenheit, then the sum of the 3 greatest of these temperatures, in degrees Fahrenheit, could be
(A) 6x
(B) 4x
(C) (5x)/3
(D) (3x)/2
(E) (3x)/5

a different approach ... let the sum of the 3 greatest be "a " and the other 2 be "b" ... so we have (a+b)/5=x ... so a+b= 5x ... now if the additon of the 3 greatest is 6x (a) .. then we have 6x+b=5x .. b= -x .. that is the additon of the 2 smallest will be equal to -x which is not possible since the tempratures are given to be positive ...

.. if a = 5x/3 then b wuld be equal to 10x/3 .. so that wuld mean the addition of 3 greatest is less than the sum of the 2 smallest which is not possible ..

similarly if a = 3x/2 .. then b wuld be equal to 7x/2 ..again a<b which is not possible

so on ..

now if u solve for a = 4x .. then we get b= x which is the culd be a possible value for b .. so answer is 4x
Join the discussion

by cramya » Thu May 14, 2009 9:20 pm
16. If the average (arithmetic mean) of 5 positive temperatures is x degrees Fahrenheit, then the sum of the 3 greatest of these temperatures, in degrees Fahrenheit, could be
(A) 6x
(B) 4x
(C) (5x)/3
(D) (3x)/2
(E) (3x)/5


total = 5x

Since its a maxmizing question start with 4x

2x x x .5x .5x

possible

choose b
Join the discussion

by aj5105 » Sun May 17, 2009 2:55 am
I chose 5 numbers : 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

(1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5)/5 = 3

Now x = 3

Substitute in the answer choices. The answer choice that gets us 12 (sum of the greatest three numbers) is the answer.

(B)
Join the discussion