BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Proportion of women in industry

Expert replies
by rohit_gmat » Sun Oct 23, 2011 4:30 am
Women make up a larger proportion of workers in the information services industry than they did ten years ago. This is partly due to the fact that in 1985, only 7 percent of women in the workforce were employed in the information services industry, but in 1995, over 16 percent of women in the workforce were employed in the information services industry.

In evaluating the argument above, it would be most useful to compare 1985 and 1995 with regard to which of the following characteristics?

A) The percentage of women in the workforce who were not employed in the information services industry

B) The percentage of women who are now retired who have worked in the information services industry

C) The percentgae of women who have been promoted to managerial positions within the information services industry

D) The percentage of men in the workforce who were employed in the informaition services industry

E) The percentage of men who will soon be eligible for employment in the information services industry


OAD
Source : PrincetonReview

I dun agree with the OA.. my reasoning is ...
1985 : # of women in workforce = 100 .. so 7 women in Info Serv Industry
& of men in workforce working for Info serv industry = 90%
# of men in workforce = 10... so 9 men in Info Serv Industry
so women are 7/16 ( arnd 40%?)

1995 : # of women in workforce = 100 .. so 16 women in Info Serv Industry
& of men in workforce working for Info serv industry = 5%
# of men in workforce = 1,000,000... so 50,000 men in Info Serv Industry
so women are 16/50,016 ( arnd 0%?)

so even tho the % of men goes up or down, using the number of men in the workforce (& # of women in the workforce) i can manipulate the result either way... so how would this be useful in determining whether or not the proportion of women in the info serv industry has inc or dec ?
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by vaibhavgupta » Sun Oct 23, 2011 4:38 am
rohit_gmat wrote:Women make up a larger proportion of workers in the information services industry than they did ten years ago. This is partly due to the fact that in 1985, only 7 percent of women in the workforce were employed in the information services industry, but in 1995, over 16 percent of women in the workforce were employed in the information services industry.

In evaluating the argument above, it would be most useful to compare 1985 and 1995 with regard to which of the following characteristics?

A) The percentage of women in the workforce who were not employed in the information services industry

B) The percentage of women who are now retired who have worked in the information services industry

C) The percentgae of women who have been promoted to managerial positions within the information services industry

D) The percentage of men in the workforce who were employed in the informaition services industry

E) The percentage of men who will soon be eligible for employment in the information services industry


OAD
Source : PrincetonReview

I dun agree with the OA.. my reasoning is ...
1985 : # of women in workforce = 100 .. so 7 women in Info Serv Industry
& of men in workforce working for Info serv industry = 90%
# of men in workforce = 10... so 9 men in Info Serv Industry
so women are 7/16 ( arnd 40%?)

1995 : # of women in workforce = 100 .. so 16 women in Info Serv Industry
& of men in workforce working for Info serv industry = 5%
# of men in workforce = 1,000,000... so 50,000 men in Info Serv Industry
so women are 16/50,016 ( arnd 0%?)

so even tho the % of men goes up or down, using the number of men in the workforce (& # of women in the workforce) i can manipulate the result either way... so how would this be useful in determining whether or not the proportion of women in the info serv industry has inc or dec ?

The question talks about women making a larger proportion in the industry. While the precentage of women workers have increased. the proportion will also have a high connection with the inc/dec in ?age of men working!

Hence[spoiler][/spoiler]
Join the discussion

by vaibhavgupta » Sun Oct 23, 2011 4:40 am
rohit_gmat wrote:Women make up a larger proportion of workers in the information services industry than they did ten years ago. This is partly due to the fact that in 1985, only 7 percent of women in the workforce were employed in the information services industry, but in 1995, over 16 percent of women in the workforce were employed in the information services industry.

In evaluating the argument above, it would be most useful to compare 1985 and 1995 with regard to which of the following characteristics?

A) The percentage of women in the workforce who were not employed in the information services industry

B) The percentage of women who are now retired who have worked in the information services industry

C) The percentgae of women who have been promoted to managerial positions within the information services industry

D) The percentage of men in the workforce who were employed in the informaition services industry

E) The percentage of men who will soon be eligible for employment in the information services industry


OAD
Source : PrincetonReview

I dun agree with the OA.. my reasoning is ...
1985 : # of women in workforce = 100 .. so 7 women in Info Serv Industry
& of men in workforce working for Info serv industry = 90%
# of men in workforce = 10... so 9 men in Info Serv Industry
so women are 7/16 ( arnd 40%?)

1995 : # of women in workforce = 100 .. so 16 women in Info Serv Industry
& of men in workforce working for Info serv industry = 5%
# of men in workforce = 1,000,000... so 50,000 men in Info Serv Industry
so women are 16/50,016 ( arnd 0%?)

so even tho the % of men goes up or down, using the number of men in the workforce (& # of women in the workforce) i can manipulate the result either way... so how would this be useful in determining whether or not the proportion of women in the info serv industry has inc or dec ?

The question talks about women making a larger proportion in the industry. While the precentage of women workers have increased. the proportion will also have a high connection with the inc/dec in ?age of men working!

HenceD
Join the discussion

by David@VeritasPrep » Sun Oct 23, 2011 1:51 pm
Got a PM on this one...

This is based on an official GMAT question. This one has been adjusted slightly from the original.

This question is written with D as the intended answer.

The set up of this is meant to work out the way that vaibhavgupta has mentioned above. The premise tells us that we have an increased percentage of the women in the workforce no working in information services. So if the question were "does a larger percentage of women work in the information services out of the total female workforce?

But we are trying to figure out if the following is true: # of women in the service industry / # Total workers in the service industry ...has increased.

Just knowing that service industry workers are a larger proportion of total women workers does not mean that as compared with the past women are better represented in the service industry. Specifically, we need to know how much the percentage of men who in the service industry is increasing.

So, the percentage of all women workers that is represented by women in the information service industry has increased from 7 percent to 16 percent. So let's say that the number of women has increased as well as the percentage. But what about the number of men? If the men have increased substantially as well the women may not comprise a larger percentage of information service industry employees.

So D is the answer we are looking for.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion

by rohit_gmat » Mon Oct 24, 2011 1:26 am
David@VeritasPrep wrote:So, the percentage of all women workers that is represented by women in the information service industry has increased from 7 percent to 16 percent. So let's say that the number of women has increased as well as the percentage. But what about the number of men? If the men have increased substantially as well the women may not comprise a larger percentage of information service industry employees.

So D is the answer we are looking for.

Hi David,
Thanks for the response. I agree that the knowing the number of men working in the information service industry in 1985 & 1995 is useful.

But I still don't see how the % of men in the workforce is going to give us the "actual number". Aren't these kinda flaws the ones we are supposed to be looking out for when we deal with CR Qs?
Or am I just simply thinking too much?
Join the discussion

by David@VeritasPrep » Mon Oct 24, 2011 5:44 am
I would not say that you need the actual number. What you need is something that will indicate whether it is likely that women do make up a larger proportion of information service workers.

You do not need the actual numbers! You just need the answer choice that most helps you to evaluate whether the evidence is good.

I would not say that you are over thinking, but perhaps you are looking for something too exact here. You just need something to help you see if the conclusion is more likely to be true or less likely and D would do that.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion

by GmatKiss » Mon Oct 24, 2011 10:35 am
Clear D, must be a 500 level question!
Join the discussion