BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Profit

Expert replies
by selango » Wed Sep 08, 2010 7:43 am
A construction company was paid a total of $500,000 for a construction project. The company's only costs for the project were for labor and materials. Was the company's profit for the project greater than $150,000?

(1) The company's total cost was three times its cost for materials.

(2) The company's profit was greater than its cost for labor.
--Anand--
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by beatthegmatinsept » Wed Sep 08, 2010 8:29 am
Confusing. Is it C?
Being defeated is often only a temporary condition. Giving up is what makes it permanent.
Join the discussion

by selango » Wed Sep 08, 2010 8:53 am
dude..explain ur steps.
--Anand--
Join the discussion

by beatthegmatinsept » Wed Sep 08, 2010 8:55 am
selango wrote:dude..explain ur steps.
Dude, I would explain my steps only if i know C is correct. No point my explaining something that's not even right :)
Being defeated is often only a temporary condition. Giving up is what makes it permanent.
Join the discussion

by selango » Wed Sep 08, 2010 9:02 am
beatthegmatinsept wrote:
selango wrote:dude..explain ur steps.
Dude, I would explain my steps only if i know C is correct. No point my explaining something that's not even right :)
ha..ha..dude if i tell u OA you ll be more inclined to find the answer as per OA.

Atleast explain ur steps.we will find out what ur missing :)
--Anand--
Join the discussion

by roh00kan » Wed Sep 08, 2010 10:33 am
A construction company was paid a total of $500,000 for a construction project. The company’s only costs for the project were for labor and materials. Was the company’s profit for the project greater than $150,000?

(1) The company’s total cost was three times its cost for materials.

(2) The company’s profit was greater than its cost for labor.

My Explanation is as follows:

Profit:- P
Amount:- A
Total Cost:- T = L (for labor) and M (materials)

P = A - T = A - (L+M)

The question was, whether P is greater than $150,000. In other words whether T (cost) is LESS THAN $350,000

Statement 2 says:

Profit is greater than cost for labor. i.e. P > L .

INSUFF

Statement 1 says:
Total cost is 3 times its cost for materials. i.e. T = 3 * M.
We already know, T = L + M.
So 3M = L + M ==> L = 2M

INSUFF

The Profit equation can be modified as: P = 500,000 - 3M. In order for profit to be more than $150,000, we need to have less than $350,000 as total cost. So 3M < $350,000. Or M < $116,666.7


Statements 1 and 2 together:

We can rewrite P as, P > 2M

Considering the information we got from Statement 1, we can say that, P is MORE THAN 2M. i.e. P > 2*116,666.7 which is indeed more than $150,000.

So C is the Answer.
Hope this is the answer.
Join the discussion

by selango » Wed Sep 08, 2010 9:00 pm
OA C
--Anand--
Join the discussion

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Wed Sep 08, 2010 11:37 pm
CONSTRUCTION BUDGET= 500000 project cost= labour cost +material cost


CC=50000 PC=LC+MC PROFIT= CC-PC >150000

1.PC=3MC INSUUF A AND D OUT

2.PROFIT>LC INSUFF B OUT

COMBINE PC=3MC PROFIT>LC

PC=LC+MC
3MC=LC+MC
LC=2MC
PC= LC+LC/2
PC=3/2 LC
3500000=3/2LC LC= 2333333 MC=1166666 ANYHOW WHEN LC=2 MC AND PROFIT>LC SO DEFINETLY PROFIT IS GRAETER THAN 1500000 MC CANNT BE LESS THAN 1000000 SO LC CAN BE LES THAN 2000000 SO PROFIT WILL BE ANYHOW MORE THAN 150000

SO C
A SMALL TOWN GUY
Join the discussion

by sanju09 » Thu Sep 09, 2010 12:47 am
selango wrote:A construction company was paid a total of $500,000 for a construction project. The company's only costs for the project were for labor and materials. Was the company's profit for the project greater than $150,000?

(1) The company's total cost was three times its cost for materials.

(2) The company's profit was greater than its cost for labor.

Given that L and M are the dollar costs for labor and materials.

Is 500,000 - (L + M) > 150,000? Or in other words:

Is L + M < 350,000?

(1) L + M = 3 M only gives ratio L to M, and the problem reduces to

"Is 3 M < 350,000?"; how do we know?

Insufficient

(2) 500,000 - (L + M) > L or 2 L + M < 500,000;

L + M could be less than 350,000 for L = 100,000 and M = 200,000;

could be equal to 350,000 for L = 125,000 and M = 100,000;

or even it could be greater than 350,000 for L = 135,000 and M = 200,000.

Genuinely insufficient under these contraints


Taken together, we have M < 100,000 with a question, "Is 3 M < 350,000?"

[spoiler]oh yes it is

C
[/spoiler]
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion