BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Prime Number

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Rahul@gurome » Fri Nov 19, 2010 12:56 pm
Viper83 wrote:Is Root of x a prime number?

(i) Abs (3x-7)= 2x+2

(ii) x to the power 2= 9x
Statement 1: |3x - 7| = (2x + 2)
Absolute value gives rise to two situations,
  • (1) For 3x > 7, (3x - 7) = (2x + 2) => x = 9 => √x = 3 -> Prime
    or
    (2) For 3x < 7, (7 - 3x) = (2x + 2) => x = 1 => √x = 1 -> Not Prime
Not sufficient.

Statement 2: x² = 9x
=> x² - 9x = 0 => x(x - 9) = 0 => x = 0 or 9

Not sufficient.

1 & 2 Together: x = 9 => √x = 3 -> Prime

Sufficient.

The correct answer is C.
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by Viper83 » Fri Nov 19, 2010 1:06 pm
Hi Rahul
thanks very much for your reply and explanation. In fact I solved the questions exactly like that.

My concern with this question is the following: why is the square root of 9 equal to ONLY 3. The square root of 9 should be 3 and -3. Furthermore, -3 is not a prime number.

What am I missing here?

Thanks very much!
Join the discussion

by Rahul@gurome » Fri Nov 19, 2010 1:32 pm
Viper83 wrote:My concern with this question is the following: why is the square root of 9 equal to ONLY 3. The square root of 9 should be 3 and -3. Furthermore, -3 is not a prime number.

What am I missing here?
When we are dealing with square root(s), it is always the positive one.
By definition √(x²) = |x|.

This means, if x² = 9, and we are asked to find the value of x, the answer is -3 and 3. But if are asked to find the value of √(x²), the answer is only 3.
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by gdk800 » Fri Nov 19, 2010 3:11 pm
Viper83 wrote:

Is Root of x a prime number?

(i) Abs (3x-7)= 2x+2

(ii) x to the power 2= 9x
Statement 1: |3x - 7| = (2x + 2)
Absolute value gives rise to two situations,

(1) For 3x > 7, (3x - 7) = (2x + 2) => x = 9 => √x = 3 -> Prime
or
(2) For 3x < 7, (7 - 3x) = (2x + 2) => x = 1 => √x = 1 -> Not Prime



Not sufficient.

Statement 2: x² = 9x
=> x² - 9x = 0 => x(x - 9) = 0 => x = 0 or 9

Not sufficient.

1 & 2 Together: x = 9 => √x = 3 -> Prime

Sufficient.



I have a question for Rahul, can't we ignore x = 0 in the second case because root(0) is not considered? By this, the ans. would be B.

Actually this brings me to another question as to how is root(0) treated?
Join the discussion

by Rahul@gurome » Fri Nov 19, 2010 3:22 pm
gdk800 wrote:I have a question for Rahul, can't we ignore x = 0 in the second case because root(0) is not considered? By this, the ans. would be B.

Actually this brings me to another question as to how is root(0) treated?
Our target is to identify the correct option, not to force an option to be the correct one. If there is a logic to ignore x = 0, we can certainly do that. But as there is none, we can't ignore it. And root of zero is zero only, which is not a prime number.
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion