If g(n) represented the product of every even integer from 2 to n, then g(80) + 1 is divisible by the lowest prime number p. P is:
A. Between 1 and 10
B. Between 11 and 20
C. Between 21 and 30
D. Between 31 and 40
E. Greater than 40
what I found out is that there's gonna be quite a few zeros at the end ....0000001, so I'd probably go for answer E. However, how would I be able to check if such a number was divisible by 3? pleaaaaase help
prime number question, who can solve this?
This topic has expert replies
GMAT/MBA Expert
- beatthegmat
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6773
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 8:30 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Thanked: 1249 times
- Followed by:994 members
Moved to PS area.
Beat The GMAT | The MBA Social Network
Community Management Team
Research Top GMAT Prep Courses:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/gmat-prep-courses
Research The World's Top MBA Programs:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/school
Community Management Team
Research Top GMAT Prep Courses:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/gmat-prep-courses
Research The World's Top MBA Programs:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/school
-
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:37 pm
- Location: switzerland
Thinking out loud back to ya:
"...So I would go for E on the basis that the lowest prime that it could be a multiple of would have to be more than 80."
I think the lowest prime that it could be a mutliple of would have to be more than 37, no? (74 is the the biggest even number between 2 and 78, which is itself a product of a prime factor (2x37)). so if all prime numbers up to 37 are used up, the next biggest prime number would be 41... which would still leave us with choice E. no?
I hope this is not too confusing.
"...So I would go for E on the basis that the lowest prime that it could be a multiple of would have to be more than 80."
I think the lowest prime that it could be a mutliple of would have to be more than 37, no? (74 is the the biggest even number between 2 and 78, which is itself a product of a prime factor (2x37)). so if all prime numbers up to 37 are used up, the next biggest prime number would be 41... which would still leave us with choice E. no?
I hope this is not too confusing.
Here is the explanation from the previous discussion on this board. I then tried to convey the concept through another example with small number.
h(100) = 2* 4* 6* ..... *98*100
=> 2*(2*2)*(2*3)....*(2*49)*(2*50)
=> (2^50)(1*2*3....*49*50)
Means - all integers from 1 to 50 are factors of h(100). So, none of them will be factor of h(100)+1
So, smallest prime factor of h(100)+1 will be greater than 50
To understand this problem, try h(10) instead of h(100)
H(10) = 2 * (2*2) * (2*3) * (2*4) * (2*5) [this value is 3840]
 2^5 (1 * 2 * 3 * 4 *5) [this is also 3840]
So the smalles prime factor of h(10) will be greater than 5.
The answer is 3840 ( 2, 3 and 5 are factors of 3840)
h(100) = 2* 4* 6* ..... *98*100
=> 2*(2*2)*(2*3)....*(2*49)*(2*50)
=> (2^50)(1*2*3....*49*50)
Means - all integers from 1 to 50 are factors of h(100). So, none of them will be factor of h(100)+1
So, smallest prime factor of h(100)+1 will be greater than 50
To understand this problem, try h(10) instead of h(100)
H(10) = 2 * (2*2) * (2*3) * (2*4) * (2*5) [this value is 3840]
 2^5 (1 * 2 * 3 * 4 *5) [this is also 3840]
So the smalles prime factor of h(10) will be greater than 5.
The answer is 3840 ( 2, 3 and 5 are factors of 3840)