Hi All,
Can somebody please help me understand why [spoiler]"C" and "D"[/spoiler] are wrong in the below question. OA is [spoiler]"E"[/spoiler]. Kaplan says that since [spoiler]"E"[/spoiler] is concise so it is better. Is there any other reason why we can kick out [spoiler]"D" and "E"[/spoiler] ?
In an unusual move for a Republican, the president’s directive established price controls.
(A) the president’s directive established price controls
(B) the president’s directive was to establish price controls
(C) the president was successful in the establishment of controls on prices
(D) the president had instituted controls on prices
(E) the president established price controls
Thanks
Mohit
5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP
Available with Beat the GMAT members only code
MORE DETAILS
President and Its unusual Move
-
goelmohit2002
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1799
- Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
- Thanked: 36 times
- Followed by:2 members
the word after Republican must be "president" not "president's" bc the republican is modifying president so A and B are out
C is wordy and changes the meaning of the original sentence
D is wrong bc there is no reason to use "had"...there is only one action so past tense works better here. "control on prices" is wordy price control is better
so go with E
C is wordy and changes the meaning of the original sentence
D is wrong bc there is no reason to use "had"...there is only one action so past tense works better here. "control on prices" is wordy price control is better
so go with E
Last edited by PinkBox on Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
Not only is "C" wordy, but it is also logically inconsistent with the preceding clause refering to "an unusual move for a Republican." The second clause of the sentence must report what "move" the President made. Instead, the second clause reads as if the President's "move" was his "success", which doesn't quite make sense.goelmohit2002 wrote:Hi All,
Can somebody please help me understand why [spoiler]"C" and "D"[/spoiler] are wrong in the below question. OA is [spoiler]"E"[/spoiler]. Kaplan says that since [spoiler]"E"[/spoiler] is concise so it is better. Is there any other reason why we can kick out [spoiler]"D" and "E"[/spoiler] ?
In an unusual move for a Republican, the president’s directive established price controls.
(A) the president’s directive established price controls
(B) the president’s directive was to establish price controls
(C) the president was successful in the establishment of controls on prices
(D) the president had instituted controls on prices
(E) the president established price controls
Thanks
Mohit
"D" is incorrect because (as Pinkbox writes) the past perfect tense shouldn't be used when only one past action is being reported.
-
Jatinder
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 280
- Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:18 am
- Thanked: 5 times
- GMAT Score:610
@PinkBox, Please illustrate why "In an unusual move for a Republican" can't modify President's directive?
In an unusual move for a Republican is a prepositional phrase.
if we would have "Establishing unusual move, X bla bla"
then it makes sense for the X to be a person.
Please substantiate your reasoning with example.
Thanks.
Ron, Can you please comment?
In an unusual move for a Republican is a prepositional phrase.
if we would have "Establishing unusual move, X bla bla"
then it makes sense for the X to be a person.
Please substantiate your reasoning with example.
Thanks.
Ron, Can you please comment?
Keep flying
Can a directive be a member of the Republican party? Can it run for office, give speeches, get elected, pass legislation and issue directives of its own? Of course not.Jatinder wrote:@PinkBox, Please illustrate why "In an unusual move for a Republican" can't modify President's directive?
"In an unusual move for a Republican" has to modify a person, not a directive.
We're talking about a dangling modifier here.
By talking about an "...unusual move for...", the sentence is referring to something that a person did. The identity of the person is clarified by "...a Republican". Thus, there is no doubt that the modifying phrase is talking about a person, and not an inanimate object (i.e., not the Republican's directive).Jatinder wrote: In an unusual move for a Republican is a prepositional phrase.
if we would have "Establishing unusual move, X bla bla"
then it makes sense for the X to be a person.
This link may be helpful:
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/ ... ngmod.html
-
Jatinder
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 280
- Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:18 am
- Thanked: 5 times
- GMAT Score:610
Thanks Ken3233.ken3233 wrote:By talking about an "...unusual move for...", the sentence is referring to something that a person did. The identity of the person is clarified by "...a Republican". Thus, there is no doubt that the modifying phrase is talking about a person, and not an inanimate object (i.e., not the Republican's directive).Jatinder wrote: In an unusual move for a Republican is a prepositional phrase.
if we would have "Establishing unusual move, X bla bla"
then it makes sense for the X to be a person.
This link may be helpful:
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/ ... ngmod.html
I got the right trigger.
Keep flying
-
goelmohit2002
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1799
- Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
- Thanked: 36 times
- Followed by:2 members
Between "C", "D" and "E", there is a vertical split between:
"controls on prices" - used in "C" and "D".---note that "controls" is used
price controls - used in "E".---> here control is used.
Are both correct usages as per grammar....?
Can we kick out "C" and "D" based on this split ?
Thanks
Mohit
"controls on prices" - used in "C" and "D".---note that "controls" is used
price controls - used in "E".---> here control is used.
Are both correct usages as per grammar....?
Can we kick out "C" and "D" based on this split ?
Thanks
Mohit
That's a good question. I'm pretty certain that both usages are grammatically correct, but that "price controls" is the better answer for reasons of concision.goelmohit2002 wrote:Between "C", "D" and "E", there is a vertical split between:
"controls on prices" - used in "C" and "D".---note that "controls" is used
price controls - used in "E".---> here control is used.
Are both correct usages as per grammar....?
Can we kick out "C" and "D" based on this split ?
Thanks
Mohit
Again, I'm just beginning to learn these finer points of grammar myself, so I'm not an expert.
Have you picked up a copy of MGMAT SC? It's an excellent source book. I have also found Barron's SC notes (by a guy named Jaffe) to be a good start, too. Reading these sources is tedious work, but it's worth the trouble.
https://books.google.com/books?id=S4X8aw ... q=barron's
-
goelmohit2002
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1799
- Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
- Thanked: 36 times
- Followed by:2 members
Thanks Ken.ken3233 wrote:That's a good question. I'm pretty certain that both usages are grammatically correct, but that "price controls" is the better answer for reasons of concision.goelmohit2002 wrote:Between "C", "D" and "E", there is a vertical split between:
"controls on prices" - used in "C" and "D".---note that "controls" is used
price controls - used in "E".---> here control is used.
Are both correct usages as per grammar....?
Can we kick out "C" and "D" based on this split ?
Thanks
Mohit
Again, I'm just beginning to learn these finer points of grammar myself, so I'm not an expert.
Have you picked up a copy of MGMAT SC? It's an excellent source book. I have also found Barron's SC notes (by a guy named Jaffe) to be a good start, too. Reading these sources is tedious work, but it's worth the trouble.
https://books.google.com/books?id=S4X8aw ... q=barron's
Yes I have MGMAT SC guide. I think it's amongst the best resource for GMAT SC.
Experts please tell is "Controls on prices" and "Price controls" both gramatically correct.
Thanks
Mohit
-
pJackson79
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 11:44 pm
- Thanked: 1 times
I am no expert, but I think you would go with "price controls" because it is shorter and more clear.goelmohit2002 wrote: Experts please tell is "Controls on prices" and "Price controls" both gramatically correct.
Last edited by pJackson79 on Tue Mar 31, 2009 4:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
this is not a good question.
they're telling you that (e) is better than (d) because it's more concise: i.e., it uses the simple past (one word) rather than the past perfect (two words).
unfortunately, this is not how real gmat problems work.
on an official problem, if you are to choose between two verb tenses, then there will be CONTEXT that enables you to determine that one of the tenses is INCORRECT, not just "less concise".
this problem sets a VERY dangerous precedent, in that it will probably convince some of you that the best criterion for choosing a verb tense is concision. that's simply not true: if CONTEXT dictates that, say, you should choose the past perfect over the simple past, then you must do so.
examples:
although james had never run a marathon, he finished the boston marathon in under three hours. --> correct. you must use the past perfect "had never run", because the relevance of this statement terminates at james's running of the boston marathon.
although james never ran a marathon, he finished the boston marathon in under three hours. --> incorrect. not only is "never ran" in the wrong tense, but this sentence actually contradicts itself (by simultaneously saying that james never ran a marathon and that he finished the boston marathon).
the second of these, which is more concise, is ... wrong.
period.
--
on an official problem, you will not be forced to choose between verb tenses in otherwise correct sentences based on concision.
bad.
they're telling you that (e) is better than (d) because it's more concise: i.e., it uses the simple past (one word) rather than the past perfect (two words).
unfortunately, this is not how real gmat problems work.
on an official problem, if you are to choose between two verb tenses, then there will be CONTEXT that enables you to determine that one of the tenses is INCORRECT, not just "less concise".
this problem sets a VERY dangerous precedent, in that it will probably convince some of you that the best criterion for choosing a verb tense is concision. that's simply not true: if CONTEXT dictates that, say, you should choose the past perfect over the simple past, then you must do so.
examples:
although james had never run a marathon, he finished the boston marathon in under three hours. --> correct. you must use the past perfect "had never run", because the relevance of this statement terminates at james's running of the boston marathon.
although james never ran a marathon, he finished the boston marathon in under three hours. --> incorrect. not only is "never ran" in the wrong tense, but this sentence actually contradicts itself (by simultaneously saying that james never ran a marathon and that he finished the boston marathon).
the second of these, which is more concise, is ... wrong.
period.
--
on an official problem, you will not be forced to choose between verb tenses in otherwise correct sentences based on concision.
bad.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
-
goelmohit2002
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1799
- Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
- Thanked: 36 times
- Followed by:2 members
Thanks Ron for clearing the doubts.Can you please telllunarpower wrote: on an official problem, you will not be forced to choose between verb tenses in otherwise correct sentences based on concision.
bad.
a) should we ignore this question...or
b) as fellow members suggested above for kicking out "C" and "D" sound convincing to you too.
c) or you think there might be some better reasons to kick out "C" and "D".
Kindly give your opinion about "controls on prices" and "price controls" split too.
Thanks
Mohit
-
TedCornell
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 9:33 pm
- Thanked: 115 times
- Followed by:24 members
- GMAT Score:750
Actually, there is plenty of context here to determine that the past perfect "had instituted" is wrong and this split could very well be on an official GMAT question.
Pinky did a fantastic job of explaining. This sentence has only one conjugated verb (instute/establish). The past perfect is not appropriate because this verb does not express the first of two past actions.
(I study with OG, MGMAT SC and GMATFix Verbal Flashcards)
Pinky did a fantastic job of explaining. This sentence has only one conjugated verb (instute/establish). The past perfect is not appropriate because this verb does not express the first of two past actions.
(I study with OG, MGMAT SC and GMATFix Verbal Flashcards)
