With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have grown to exceed 175,000.
(A)With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have
(B)With no natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that do not allow hunting, wildlife officials' estimate of the deer population in New Jersey has
(C)With no natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods where there is no hunting, the deer population in New Jersey, wildlife officials estimate, has
(D)Without natural predators and no hunting allowed in expanses of green suburban neighborhoods, New Jersey has a deer population that wildlife officials estimate to have
(E)Without natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods where there is no hunting, wildlife officials in New Jersey estimate a deer population that has
With no natural predators
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 259
- Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 8:30 pm
- Thanked: 16 times
Isn't population singular ?
If that's the case then A,D is out .
Whats OA, I am leaning to-wards B
If that's the case then A,D is out .
Whats OA, I am leaning to-wards B
Yes it is butamitabhprasad wrote:Isn't population singular ?
deer population that wildlife officials estimate to has...
does not make sense
"to have" here is not has/have's have
see this example, you will get an idea
He wants to have a big Car.
Hope it clarifies your doubt.
If that's the case then A,D is out .
Whats OA, I am leaning to-wards B
- dumb.doofus
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 435
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 2:02 pm
- Location: San Jose, CA
- Thanked: 43 times
- Followed by:1 members
- GMAT Score:720
I think this is a case of modifier type of problem and only one sentence puts the modifier correctly i.e. Choice Cska7945 wrote:With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have grown to exceed 175,000.
(A)With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have
(B)With no natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that do not allow hunting, wildlife officials' estimate of the deer population in New Jersey has
(C)With no natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods where there is no hunting, the deer population in New Jersey, wildlife officials estimate, has
(D)Without natural predators and no hunting allowed in expanses of green suburban neighborhoods, New Jersey has a deer population that wildlife officials estimate to have
(E)Without natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods where there is no hunting, wildlife officials in New Jersey estimate a deer population that has
In all the sentences, the first part before comma is talking about deer, so the part after comma has to start with Deer. Only one sentence does that.
IMO, C. The biggest hint in this sentence is "no natural predators".. this applies to only deers. It cannot apply to New Jersey or anything else.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 11:00 am
- Location: USA
- Thanked: 6 times
- Followed by:1 members
The adverbial modifier is correctly used only in (C)ska7945 wrote:With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have grown to exceed 175,000.
(A)With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have
(B)With no natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that do not allow hunting, wildlife officials' estimate of the deer population in New Jersey has
(C)With no natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods where there is no hunting, the deer population in New Jersey, wildlife officials estimate, has
(D)Without natural predators and no hunting allowed in expanses of green suburban neighborhoods, New Jersey has a deer population that wildlife officials estimate to have
(E)Without natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods where there is no hunting, wildlife officials in New Jersey estimate a deer population that has
- adilka
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 9:28 am
- Location: Canada
- Thanked: 1 times
- GMAT Score:700
Why can't "no natural predators" refer to NJ? New Jersey can have no natural predators. Right?dumb.doofus wrote:The biggest hint in this sentence is "no natural predators".. this applies to only deers. It cannot apply to New Jersey or anything else.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 353
- Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 1:29 am
- Location: Italy
- Thanked: 7 times
- GMAT Score:720
It has to be D, as the first sentence cannot refer to deer but to New Jersey!
Beat The GMAT - 1st priority
Enter a top MBA program - 2nd priority
Loving my wife: MOST IMPORTANT OF ALL!
REAL THING 1 (AUG 2007): 680 (Q43, V40)
REAL THING 2 (APR 2009): 720 (Q47, V41)
Enter a top MBA program - 2nd priority
Loving my wife: MOST IMPORTANT OF ALL!
REAL THING 1 (AUG 2007): 680 (Q43, V40)
REAL THING 2 (APR 2009): 720 (Q47, V41)
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 11:00 am
- Location: USA
- Thanked: 6 times
- Followed by:1 members
New Jersey doesn't have natural predators ? NO !
(C) is correct
(C) is correct
Drill baby drill !
GMATPowerPrep Test1= 740
GMATPowerPrep Test2= 760
Kaplan Diagnostic Test= 700
Kaplan Test1=600
Kalplan Test2=670
Kalplan Test3=570
GMATPowerPrep Test1= 740
GMATPowerPrep Test2= 760
Kaplan Diagnostic Test= 700
Kaplan Test1=600
Kalplan Test2=670
Kalplan Test3=570
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 5:33 pm
- Thanked: 2 times
Only B and C maintain parallelism -
With no natural predators and with expanses..
You can eliminate all other choices
With no natural predators and with expanses..
You can eliminate all other choices
OA is C.ska7945 wrote:With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have grown to exceed 175,000.
(A)With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have
(B)With no natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that do not allow hunting, wildlife officials' estimate of the deer population in New Jersey has
(C)With no natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods where there is no hunting, the deer population in New Jersey, wildlife officials estimate, has
(D)Without natural predators and no hunting allowed in expanses of green suburban neighborhoods, New Jersey has a deer population that wildlife officials estimate to have
(E)Without natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods where there is no hunting, wildlife officials in New Jersey estimate a deer population that has
I believe 'natural predators' can modify New Jersey as well.
e.g: Without serial killers and murderers since 1997, the city of Lyons has a population that has been increasing by 5 percent every year.
I think the problem with D is poor parallelism and use of 'have' instead of 'has'.
We are picking the less worser here.
The GMAT is indeed adaptable. Whenever I answer RC, it proficiently 'adapts' itself to mark my 'right' answer 'wrong'.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 11:00 am
- Location: USA
- Thanked: 6 times
- Followed by:1 members
No offense, but how can a state have "natural predator" ? NJ is the pray of some natural predator ?vscid wrote:OA is C.ska7945 wrote:With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have grown to exceed 175,000.
(A)With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have
(B)With no natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that do not allow hunting, wildlife officials' estimate of the deer population in New Jersey has
(C)With no natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods where there is no hunting, the deer population in New Jersey, wildlife officials estimate, has
(D)Without natural predators and no hunting allowed in expanses of green suburban neighborhoods, New Jersey has a deer population that wildlife officials estimate to have
(E)Without natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods where there is no hunting, wildlife officials in New Jersey estimate a deer population that has
I believe 'natural predators' can modify New Jersey as well.
e.g: Without serial killers and murderers since 1997, the city of Lyons has a population that has been increasing by 5 percent every year.
I think the problem with D is poor parallelism and use of 'have' instead of 'has'.
We are picking the less worser here.
Drill baby drill !
GMATPowerPrep Test1= 740
GMATPowerPrep Test2= 760
Kaplan Diagnostic Test= 700
Kaplan Test1=600
Kalplan Test2=670
Kalplan Test3=570
GMATPowerPrep Test1= 740
GMATPowerPrep Test2= 760
Kaplan Diagnostic Test= 700
Kaplan Test1=600
Kalplan Test2=670
Kalplan Test3=570
-
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 6:58 am
Why the state can not have predators? NJ as a place ,why NJ can not be subject of the sentence to own predators?Bidisha800 wrote:No offense, but how can a state have "natural predator" ? NJ is the pray of some natural predator ?vscid wrote:OA is C.ska7945 wrote:With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have grown to exceed 175,000.
(A)With no natural predators and expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that allow no hunting, wildlife officials estimate the New Jersey deer population to have
(B)With no natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods that do not allow hunting, wildlife officials' estimate of the deer population in New Jersey has
(C)With no natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods where there is no hunting, the deer population in New Jersey, wildlife officials estimate, has
(D)Without natural predators and no hunting allowed in expanses of green suburban neighborhoods, New Jersey has a deer population that wildlife officials estimate to have
(E)Without natural predators and with expanses of green suburban neighborhoods where there is no hunting, wildlife officials in New Jersey estimate a deer population that has
I believe 'natural predators' can modify New Jersey as well.
e.g: Without serial killers and murderers since 1997, the city of Lyons has a population that has been increasing by 5 percent every year.
I think the problem with D is poor parallelism and use of 'have' instead of 'has'.
We are picking the less worser here.
thanks