Poppy: High taxes have a chilling effect on the
economy. When individuals and corporations are
taxed, they have less money to spend. Demand for
products and services is reduced, causing unemployment
to increase. Taxes must be lowered.
Lilly: But you must also consider that taxes generate
funds for the government. If taxes are lowered, the
government will be forced to borrow more money,
thus reducing the amount of credit available. Unable
to borrow money easily, businesses and individuals
will be forced to limit their purchases.
Lilly objects to Poppy's argument by
claiming that Poppy has exaggerated the
adverse effects of high taxes
indicating that Poppy has based his argument
on insufficient evidence about the effects of
taxes on the economy
noting that Poppy has failed to adequately
define the term "taxes"
demonstrating that the danger of reducing
taxes is far more severe than the threat of
maintaining them at current levels
suggesting that the economic benefits of easy
credit outweigh the danger of unemployment
can some explain me why D is incorrect
Poppy's argument
This topic has expert replies
- vinay1983
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 643
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 4:27 am
- Thanked: 48 times
- Followed by:7 members
Is it E
D-We are not speaking about maintaining taxes here. The discussion is either to increase or decrease taxes.
D-We are not speaking about maintaining taxes here. The discussion is either to increase or decrease taxes.
You can, for example never foretell what any one man will do, but you can say with precision what an average number will be up to!
- theCodeToGMAT
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1556
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:18 pm
- Thanked: 448 times
- Followed by:34 members
- GMAT Score:650
{D} - Lily isn't doing that(demonstrating the severity)... she is just trying to point out that Poppy should also consider more data/scenario. "
According to me, Answer is [spoiler]{B}[/spoiler]
What is the OA???
According to me, Answer is [spoiler]{B}[/spoiler]
What is the OA???
R A H U L
-
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2013 9:29 pm
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2013 5:13 am
- Thanked: 50 times
- Followed by:4 members
It should be Bveenu08 wrote:Poppy: High taxes have a chilling effect on the
economy. When individuals and corporations are
taxed, they have less money to spend. Demand for
products and services is reduced, causing unemployment
to increase. Taxes must be lowered.
Lilly: But you must also consider that taxes generate
funds for the government. If taxes are lowered, the
government will be forced to borrow more money,
thus reducing the amount of credit available. Unable
to borrow money easily, businesses and individuals
will be forced to limit their purchases.
Lilly objects to Poppy's argument by
claiming that Poppy has exaggerated the
adverse effects of high taxes
indicating that Poppy has based his argument
on insufficient evidence about the effects of
taxes on the economy
noting that Poppy has failed to adequately
define the term "taxes"
demonstrating that the danger of reducing
taxes is far more severe than the threat of
maintaining them at current levels
suggesting that the economic benefits of easy
credit outweigh the danger of unemployment
can some explain me why D is incorrect
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
How does Lilly object to Poppy?veenu08 wrote:Poppy: High taxes have a chilling effect on the
economy. When individuals and corporations are
taxed, they have less money to spend. Demand for
products and services is reduced, causing unemployment
to increase. Taxes must be lowered.
Lilly: But you must also consider that taxes generate
funds for the government. If taxes are lowered, the
government will be forced to borrow more money,
thus reducing the amount of credit available. Unable
to borrow money easily, businesses and individuals
will be forced to limit their purchases.
Lilly objects to Poppy's argument by
claiming that Poppy has exaggerated the
adverse effects of high taxes
indicating that Poppy has based his argument
on insufficient evidence about the effects of
taxes on the economy
noting that Poppy has failed to adequately
define the term "taxes"
demonstrating that the danger of reducing
taxes is far more severe than the threat of
maintaining them at current levels
suggesting that the economic benefits of easy
credit outweigh the danger of unemployment
By pointing out that Poppy's argument considers only the EFFECTS OF HIGH TAXES.
What about the EFFECTS OF LOWERING TAXES?
The government will be forced to borrow more money, thus reducing the amount of credit available. Unable to borrow money easily, businesses and individuals will be forced to limit their purchases.
In other words, Lilly objects by doing the following:
B: indicating that has Poppy has based his argument on insufficient evidence about the effects of taxes on the economy.
The correct answer is B.
D: demonstrating that the danger of reducing taxes is far more severe than the threat of maintaining them at current levels.
Beware answer choices that make COMPARISONS.
LIlly never claims that lowering taxes would be WORSE that maintaining them at current levels.
She merely points out that lowering taxes will have negative effects that Poppy has not CONSIDERED.
Eliminate D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3