BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Bold Face - Princeton Review

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 270
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 9:00 am
Thanked: 24 times
Followed by:2 members

by neerajkumar1_1 » Sun Oct 17, 2010 2:01 am
I would opt for D...

The first provides a conclusion to an argument that one should not waste money on attorneys to draft a will as the distribution of property is usually the same...

the second says that distribution of assets is not the only function of a will,.... so u still need an attorney to draft a bill...

OA??
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 38
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 10:27 pm

by Dangerous Dude » Sun Oct 17, 2010 2:23 am
I would go with D.... as first is conclusion... and second is contradicting the argument of first
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 132
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 10:08 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members

by clawhammer » Sun Oct 17, 2010 3:53 am
That's what I though too.

However, OA is B.

- PrincetonReview says problem with E is it's not a premise but an assumption! is that even something I need to check in GMAT???

Image
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 268
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:32 am
Thanked: 17 times

by this_time_i_will » Sun Oct 17, 2010 4:07 am
i also selected D and was wondering how B is the OA!
The second bold faced statment no way provides an evidence.
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 201
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 2:23 pm
Thanked: 7 times
Followed by:1 members

by ov25 » Sun Oct 17, 2010 5:07 am
Guys...there cannot be a conclusion for the passage as it is a conversation and the two had taken opposite positions
B is it. Just paraphrases the above status
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 1119
Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 8:50 am
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:3 members

by diebeatsthegmat » Sun Oct 17, 2010 8:49 am
ov25 wrote:Guys...there cannot be a conclusion for the passage as it is a conversation and the two had taken opposite positions
B is it. Just paraphrases the above status
agree that second bold sentence is like an evidence to support another conclusion..." thus..." for the last sentence it stated however i dun undertsand why its the first states just a position... i thought it should be a conclusion as it is always in Gmat.... hmhmhmhm
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 1119
Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 8:50 am
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:3 members

by diebeatsthegmat » Sun Oct 17, 2010 8:50 am
diebeatsthegmat wrote:
ov25 wrote:Guys...there cannot be a conclusion for the passage as it is a conversation and the two had taken opposite positions
B is it. Just paraphrases the above status
agree that second bold sentence is like an evidence to support another conclusion..." thus..." for the last sentence it stated however i dun undertsand why its the first states just a position... i thought it should be a conclusion as it is always in Gmat.... hmhmhmhm
selected D too
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1