BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

points on a number line.

Expert replies

by asgupta2k » Sat Oct 08, 2011 9:44 am
both condition should meet to answer this question.
Join the discussion

by mourinhogmat1 » Wed Dec 14, 2011 2:35 am
There are only two conditions which need to be analyzed for this question.
1) when x & y are different signs.
2) z is either positive or negative.
Additional condition is z is closer to x than y is.

So, when xyz -> + - +, then the way the numbers line up on the number line could be yxz or yzx. So, thats insufficient. Z may or may not be in the centre.
Likewise, when xyz -> - + +, then the way the three integers line up could be xyz or xzy. So, thats insufficient as well. Z may or may not be in the centre.

But notice the value of z is not constrained by any given information so z can technically be extreme negative or extreme positive and still satisfy conditions 1) and 2) while x & y are opp signs.

Therefore, E.
Join the discussion

by him1985 » Sun Feb 05, 2012 4:04 am
Definitely E....
We cant infer the position of Z on no. line from given options
Himanshu Chauhan
Join the discussion

by thevenus » Thu Aug 09, 2012 3:03 am
straight (E)
(b) doesnt say anythng abt Z and (a) says that either one or all the three are negative nos.
which is insufficient.combing both will lead us to insufficient details to answer.
Join the discussion

by mparakala » Wed Nov 07, 2012 8:12 am
1) not sufficient! clearly indicates x, y and z could be in any order on the number line

2) tricky! coz z value is not mentioned. it could take a positive value closer to x than y or a negative value closer to x than y.
not sufficient!

E
Join the discussion

by rajeshsinghgmat » Sun Jan 27, 2013 5:40 pm
E in answEr.
Join the discussion

by RaybanM » Wed Jun 19, 2013 12:40 am
For some reason the web site and the email through which I received the question do not show the multiple choice answers.. In any case my thinking is that thee isnt enough data to answer the question. Y Z or both could be negative numbers and because of that you dont know enough about either relative position as a negative number to complete the task. So whatever answer relates to that I hope wins.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Jun 19, 2013 4:10 am
On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater than the distance between x and z. Does z lie between x and y on the number line?
a) xyz < 0
b) xy < 0
When no order is specified, consider different -- especially non-alphabetic -- orderings of the given points.

The following case satisfies all of the constraints in the problem:
y=-10..............................0..................z=9.....x=10
Here, z lies between x and y.

The following case satisfies all of the constraints in the problem:
y=-10..............................0..............................x=10....z=11
Here, z does NOT lie between x and y.

Thus, the two statements combined are INSUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is E.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Mathsbuddy » Wed Nov 27, 2013 12:16 am
I) xy<0
Arrangement options: xz0y,zx0y,x0zy,xoyz,...
INSUFFICIENT

II) xyz<0
Arrangement options: x0zy,x0yz,xz0y, zx0y,...
INSUFFICIENT

COMBINED:
Arrangement options: x0zy,x0yz, ...
INSUFFICIENT
]

E. statements 1 and 2 together are not sufficient, and additional data is needed to answer the question
Join the discussion

by verma.kumarrishikesh » Thu Sep 11, 2014 10:59 am
fundamentals are important so i have solved the number-line question with number line and thanks for the question.

Given line segment xy>xz so they can be placed on number line in aforesaid way.
Now if we put relative positions of zero only following inference can be concluded with certainty.

That there would be only 2 definite cases where z cannot fall between x and y.
In rest of the cases we need more info to determine the positions.
Case1 x and y negative and z positive
Case 2 x and y positive and z negative
Concluding "z" can't fall between "x" and "y" if "x" and "y" have same sign and z opposite.

Statement 1
xyz<0, chances are xy and z may be of opposite sign or same sign so it's insufficient.

Statement 2
xy<0, xy are of opposite sign but no info on z sign so it's insufficient

Combining
z>0 and x and y have opposite sign again no definite conclusion.

So ans is E
Attachments
V.gif
NUMBER LINE
Join the discussion

by nikhilgmat31 » Wed Jun 10, 2015 4:46 am
x distance to y > x distance to z
A) xyz< 0
either 1 are negative
y,0,z,x
y,0,x,z
x,0,z,y
x,0,y,z


or All three are negative
y,z,x,0
y,x,z,0
x,z,y,0
x,y,z,0

B) xy < 0

1) x <0 & y >0
x 0 z y
z x 0 y
x z 0 y
2) x>0 & y<0
y z 0 x
y 0 z x
y 0 x z

B is Insufficient
Join the discussion

by nikhilgmat31 » Fri Jun 26, 2015 12:41 am
Answer is E
Join the discussion

by HA PHUONG » Wed May 31, 2017 2:14 am
Chose E
Join the discussion

by deepak4mba » Thu Mar 08, 2018 2:41 am
Join the discussion