BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

points on a number line.

Expert replies

by Ian Stewart » Tue Apr 26, 2011 12:10 pm
krishnakumar.ks wrote: 3) x +ve, y +ve, z -ve , [x,y,z] = [1,4,-3] (z does not lie b/w x and y)
Just a caveat - you need to be careful here. You aren't using all of the information in the question: we know the distance between x and y is greater than the distance between x and z. So several of the cases you've considered are actually not applicable. Fortunately here it doesn't affect the answer, but in general, in DS, if you are not using all of your information, you'll very often think a Statement is insufficient when it actually is sufficient. So if you are going to pick numbers in DS, do always confirm that you've accounted for all of the information given.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by sushantgupta » Sun May 01, 2011 11:11 pm
1. xyz < 0 means odd number of digits are negative in this case 1 or 3. No real information and hence not sufficient.
2. xy<0 means x and y are on opposite side of the number line . Hence x<0 & y> 0 or x>0 and y<0. This information is also not sufficient.

With 1 & 2 we have z > 0 as out of x and y only 1 is negative.
But we still don't know out of x,y which one is negative. So lets check both the options.

let x > 0 & y < 0 . In this case as z could be on either side of x and would still satisfy the condition that |x-z| < |x-y|. As this option itself yields 2 solution there is no need to check for other condition answer should be E.
Join the discussion

by nafiul9090 » Fri May 13, 2011 8:06 am
ashforgmat wrote:153) Distance between x and y is greater than distance between x and z. Does z lie between x and y on the number line?
a. xyz < 0
b. xy < 0


[spoiler]Shudnt the answer be E for above? [/spoiler]
we can rephrase the question stem that x,y,and z must be positive or 2 of them must be negative

in statement o1, 1 or 3 variables could be negative so insufficient
in statement 02, here 1 variable must be negative, so insufficient

combined 1 or 3 variables could be negative so insufficient


correct me if my reasoning is wrong
Join the discussion

by MAAJ » Fri May 13, 2011 9:30 am
Hey I arrived to (E). Just wanted to post the way I solved it.

|x - y| > |x - z|; Is x < z < y ? OR y < z < x ?

Find the positive ABS:
x - y > x - z
-y > -z
y < z

STMT 1: Insufficient
x y z < 0
+ + - < 0
+ - + < 0
- + + < 0

STMT 2: Insufficient
x y < 0
+ - < 0
- + < 0

Combined 1 & 2, only these two scenerios are posible:
x y z < 0
+ - + < 0
- + + < 0

But from the positive ABS we know that y < z, so y must be negative and z positive so the only possible sceneario is:
x y z < 0
+ - + < 0

So it turns out that y < z ? x. If we look at |x - y| > |x - z| the value of x could equal z, but there's no way to confirm that.

So picked (E)!!! :)
"There's a difference between interest and commitment. When you're interested in doing something, you do it only when circumstance permit. When you're committed to something, you accept no excuses, only results."
Join the discussion

by saketk » Wed Aug 31, 2011 9:56 am
Just saw so many lengthy replies on the previous page.
We should simply take few values and solve this question
It can be done in 1:30 mins approx
From statement 1 we know that either one out of x,y,or z is negative or all three are negative
Hence we cannot find out the answer
From second statement we cannot find put any information about z
Hence, insufficient
Even after using both the statements together we cannot find the answer
Hence, E
Join the discussion

by olegpoi » Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:11 pm
E:

(1) either all three should be negative or one of them:
x=-2
y=-4
z=-3 or -1 => Insuficient

(2) either x or y should be negative. z can be before and after x

(1+2)
tells that z is positive but no restrictions for z to be on the line between x and y
Join the discussion

by zander21 » Mon Sep 05, 2011 7:34 pm
Testluv wrote:I'd say about 640-660!
I don't know, I think it's about as hard as absolute value and inequalities can get, IMO. 700+. Seriously, most people it would take 5 minutes to figure out, or most would guess.
Join the discussion

by leumas » Fri Sep 09, 2011 8:00 am
Testluv wrote:I'd say about 640-660!
How do you identify the score with a question?? This is a question just out of curiosity.
Join the discussion

by Deependra1 » Sun Sep 11, 2011 7:21 am
I know the ANSWER is NOT E but ...?
Join the discussion

by prashant misra » Wed Sep 14, 2011 4:40 am
i am still not able o get this question how the answer choice E is correct
Join the discussion

by saketk » Wed Sep 14, 2011 7:36 am
prashant misra wrote:i am still not able o get this question how the answer choice E is correct
Pasting the question again --

153) Distance between x and y is greater than distance between x and z. Does z lie between x and y on the number line?
a. xyz < 0
b. xy < 0


SOLUTION: --

statement 1--

product of xyz is less than zero

this implies either 1 of them or all of them are negative


Suppose only 1 of them is negative (say z)

let's choose values -- Z= -1

X= 0
Y = 5

this fulfills the condition ..

Distance between XY (5) is greater than distance between XZ (1)

Here Z is not present between X and Y.

Now suppose all of them are negative

X= -1
Y = -5
z= -2

In this case as well the condition given in the question is fulfilled.

But, here Z lies betwen X and Y.

Hence Statement 1 is INSUFFICIENT


Statement 2 --

Product of XY is less than zero

nothing is given about Z .. So Z can be anything (NEGATIVE or POSITIVE) -- Hence, we cannot conclude anything about Z's position.

Hence Statement 2 is INSUFFICIENT


Now let's combine the 2 conditions..

we have XY <0 [mean either X or Y is NEGATIVE) and xyz < 0 [ Since we know that either X or Y is negative and the whole product is also negative , Z is POSITIVE)

(I hope this point is clear to you)

let's assign some values

X = -1
Y = 4
Z = 2

This satisfies the condition [ distance between XY (5) is greater than distance between XZ (3)] -- here Z is between X and Y

now say Z is negative

X = 1
Y = 10
Z = -2

This also Satisfies the condition [ distance between XY (9) is greater than distance between XZ (3)] -- Here Z is NOT between X and Y


Therefore, even the two statments combined cannot give us any unique answer.

CORRECT ANSWER = E
Join the discussion

by saketk » Wed Sep 14, 2011 7:38 am
Deependra1 wrote:I know the ANSWER is NOT E but ...?
E is the correct answer!
Join the discussion

by leumas » Wed Sep 14, 2011 8:46 am
saketk wrote:
prashant misra wrote:i am still not able o get this question how the answer choice E is correct
Pasting the question again --

153) Distance between x and y is greater than distance between x and z. Does z lie between x and y on the number line?
a. xyz < 0
b. xy < 0
Here is another solution:

Plug in numbers:
a. xyz<0
x=-1, y=0, z=1 - False
x=1, y=0, z=-1 - False
x=1, y=-1, z=0 - True

Not sufficient - No A&D

b.xy<0
No info on Z, so we cannot conclude since the sign of z (+ or -) can decide the result.- No B

Now, C or E?

C? - Together xyz<0 and xy<0, now we know Z is positive and greater than zero
Again plugin the first set with positive z value alone
x=-1, y=0, z=1 - False
x=2, y=0, z=1 - True

Still both results are possible, so insufficient.

So choose E. Hope it helps. It's about two minutes to plugin and find out.
Join the discussion

by navami » Wed Sep 14, 2011 10:36 am
very tricky ...
E
This time no looking back!!!
Navami
Join the discussion

by parul9 » Wed Oct 05, 2011 12:12 am
E!!
Join the discussion