BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Please solve these CR with proper reasoning

Expert replies
by ruplun » Mon Apr 25, 2011 8:53 am
1.While price supports for dairy products will save jobs in the dairy industry, they will also endanger jobs in other food industries. Because price supports will make dairy products more expensive, families will spend a greater portion of their food budgets on dairy products.

The author's argument depends on which of the following premises?

Most consumers would not prefer lower-priced dairy products to other lower-priced food items.
If dairy price supports are implemented, there will be an increase in the number of jobs in the dairy industry.

Consumers would spend more money on other types of food if there were no dairy price supports.

If price supports for other food products were implemented, sales of those products would decline.

The quantity of dairy products sold will decrease if price supports are implemented.


2.Pharmaceutical companies typically charge slightly inflated prices for drugs that have a large customer base and are heavily prescribed by doctors to balance the losses such companies experience from producing "orphan" drugs, drugs that are used by so few patients that they can never be profitable. New federal regulations require pharmaceutical companies to limit the price they charge for any drug to cost plus a predetermined percentage profit.

If the statements above are true, which of the following must also be true?


New pharmaceutical technology has made advances possible; the drugs produced by such technology, however, are too expensive for all but the most wealthy patients.

If pharmaceutical companies do not find another source of income to balance the losses they experience in producing "orphan" drugs, such companies will no longer be able to produce such drugs without compromising overall profits.

Some patients already request generic pharmaceuticals, when they are available, because they are typically less expensive than name-brand pharmaceuticals.

If pharmaceutical companies reduce the costs of producing most drugs, they will be able to earn more profits despite the new law, and thus will be able to balance the losses they experience from the production of "orphan" drugs.

Even though charitable organizations that fund research into the rare diseases treated by "orphan" drugs provide some donations to offset the costs of "orphan" drugs, such donations are declining.


3.As more and more women develop breast cancer, the disease is given more media coverage, which will lead to increased funding for breast cancer research.

Which of the following, if true, offers the LEAST support to the argument above?


Although some breast cancer cases may be inherited, the primary cause of the increased number of cases may prove to be environmental.

In the past five years, several famous women have been stricken with breast cancer and given numerous interviews on the subject.

When a cause receives increased media coverage, philanthropic foundations tend to give that cause added financial support.

As long as a disease is unpublicized, it is unlikely to attract either researchers or funding for research.

In recent years, breast cancer has stricken more women than has any other type of cancer, or even any other disease.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by badpoem » Mon Apr 25, 2011 9:53 am
IMO -

1 - Consumers would spend more money on other types of food if there were no dairy price supports. (C)

2 - If pharmaceutical companies do not find another source of income to balance the losses they experience in producing "orphan" drugs, such companies will no longer be able to produce such drugs without compromising overall profits. (B)

3 - Although some breast cancer cases may be inherited, the primary cause of the increased number of cases may prove to be environmental. (A)

OAs please?
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:07 am
Where did u get this question ?
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:17 am
1)A
2)B
3)A Not Sure
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion

by ruplun » Mon Apr 25, 2011 9:54 pm
i know the answers but seek the explanation as why these choices please....
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:07 pm
ruplun wrote:i know the answers but seek the explanation as why these choices please....
Ya But theres a point explaining the answers only if they r correct . wats the OA
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion

by sandy217 » Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:59 pm
1 C Negate this , it certainly weakens the argument.
2 B
3 confused between A and E , will go with E (For no special reason, both seem irrelevant)
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Mon Apr 25, 2011 11:12 pm
sandy217 wrote:1 C Negate this , it certainly weakens the argument.
We are not concerned with what happens when the price supports are not provided.
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion

by sandy217 » Tue Apr 26, 2011 12:35 am
mundasingh123 wrote:
sandy217 wrote:1 C Negate this , it certainly weakens the argument.
We are not concerned with what happens when the price supports are not provided.
Thread for 1st question
https://gmatclub.com/forum/zumit-cr-69849.html

OA is C
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Tue Apr 26, 2011 1:06 am
sandy217 wrote:
mundasingh123 wrote:
sandy217 wrote:1 C Negate this , it certainly weakens the argument.
We are not concerned with what happens when the price supports are not provided.
Thread for 1st question
https://gmatclub.com/forum/zumit-cr-69849.html

OA is C
Nice what if u negate A here

Whats the OA to the rest ?
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion

by atulmangal » Tue Apr 26, 2011 9:41 am
IMO C for 1st question

EXPLANATION:

If X -> Y, then its true to say

Y (NOT) -> X (NOT)

X = dairy price supports
Y = consumer not spend more money on other food products

applying, Y (NOT) -> X (NOT)

Y (NOT)consumer would spend more money on other types of food (X NOT) if there were no dairy
price supports.

Hence Op C
Join the discussion

by Geva@EconomistGMAT » Tue Apr 26, 2011 1:04 pm
Q2:

Premises:
1) pharma companies lose moneyh on "orphan drugs"
2) they offset the losses by overchargin for common chemicals - think paracetamol.
3) The government is going to stop this overcharging

Form your own conclusion before going to the answer choices: the only conclusion you can really reach here is that pharma companies will see their profits damaged, unless something changes from the above.

B says exactly that - if the pharma companies do not find other sources of profit, and still continue to produce unprofitable orphan drugs, they will see lower profits than they do today.
Geva
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT
1-888-780-GMAT
https://www.mastergmat.com
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Tue Apr 26, 2011 1:24 pm
Geva@MasterGMAT wrote:Q2:

Premises:
1) pharma companies lose moneyh on "orphan drugs"
2) they offset the losses by overchargin for common chemicals - think paracetamol.
3) The government is going to stop this overcharging

Form your own conclusion before going to the answer choices: the only conclusion you can really reach here is that pharma companies will see their profits damaged, unless something changes from the above.

B says exactly that - if the pharma companies do not find other sources of profit, and still continue to produce unprofitable orphan drugs, they will see lower profits than they do today.
hi geva can u share your insight on q1 and q3
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion

by e-GMAT » Tue Apr 26, 2011 2:27 pm
Let me take a shot at Q3: In my opinion, the correct choice is A

As more and more women develop breast cancer, the disease is given more media coverage, which will lead to increased funding for breast cancer research.

Conclusion: Increased funding for breast cancer research
Stimulus Analysis:


More women develop breast cancer --> more media coverage --> Increased funding

Strengtheners

1. Evidence showing that more women are developing breast cancer.
2. Evidence showing increasing media coverage.
3. Evidence that the increasing media coverage actually increases funding.

Which of the following, if true, offers the LEAST support to the argument above?

1. Although some breast cancer cases may be inherited, the primary cause of the increased number of cases may prove to be environmental.

-- This choice simply states the causes of breast cancer. This is not relevant to the argument and is the correct choice.

2. In the past five years, several famous women have been stricken with breast cancer and given numerous interviews on the subject

--Evidence showing increasing media coverage which as per the argument may lead to increased funding: Therefore strengthener

3. When a cause receives increased media coverage, philanthropic foundations tend to give that cause added financial support

-- Evidence stating that the principle above works (also strengthener since it makes the conclusion more likely)

4. As long as a disease is unpublicized, it is unlikely to attract either researchers or funding for research.
--- Only funding portion is relevant, This argument states that as a disease is publicised it is likely to attract funding supporting that there is positive relationship between funding and publicity (media coverage)

5. In recent years, breast cancer has stricken more women than has any other type of cancer, or even any other disease

-- Talks about increased incidence of breast cancer or higher funding

I would recommend our logical structure concept for those who want to know how to find multiple strengtheners or assumptions in an argument. This concept is a part of a free trial. just register at the link below:

https://e-gmat.com/register.php
Join the discussion

by Geva@EconomistGMAT » Tue Apr 26, 2011 10:16 pm
Q1 has been discussed at length, and I agree that the answer is C. The premise is that if dairy products remain expensive, families will devote a greater portion of their budget on dairy products. This alone is not enough to make the leap to the conclusion that this will hurt other industries. The missing step (the assumption that bridges between the premise and the conclusion) is that the budget is "fixed", and one product (i.e. dairy) comes at the expense of others, which will explain why the other industries will be hurt.
Geva
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT
1-888-780-GMAT
https://www.mastergmat.com
Join the discussion