Dear Stoic74:

Which program is best for you comes down to how you weigh the costs versus the benefits of each. The financial costs of Kellogg are obviously greater as it will require you to travel to Chicago every weekend for 2 years. That is a huge additional cost for you to bear. However, do you feel the benefit of the Kellogg name and any differences in curriculum or program are worth the additional cost? Depending on what you want to do post-MBA and where (US vs. India), do you feel there is more value to the Kellogg name versus the UT-Austin name? If you stay in the same industry, does the UT-Austin reputation and program provide you what you need, and in some ways is the better choice?

Overall, part-time programs are not designed with career services and extracurriculars like a full-time program because they are designed for working professionals looking to enhance their current career path. If you want access to those things and take advantage of any services available to you, then it seems UT-Austin might be the better choice. Either way, you need to research what career services and extracurriculars are available to you as a part-time student in both programs.

If the answer to these questions is yes, it is worth the additional costs of flying to Chicago, then make sure you can bear these costs (both financially and time) for the next two years.

Best of luck,
Lisa